Rising powers, people rising: neo-liberalization and its discontents in the BRICS countries

References

• Agence France-Presse. (2016, March 22). Millions more Russians living in poverty as economic crisis bites. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/22/millions-more-russians-living-in-poverty-as-economic-crisis-bites
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C., & Blyth, M. (2013). The BRICs and the Washington consensus: An introduction. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 241–255. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2000). From ‘dangerous classes’ to ‘quiet rebels’: Politics of the urban subaltern in the global south. International Sociology, 15(3), 533–557. doi: 10.1177/026858000015003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchert, J., & Lessenich, S. (2016). Claus Offe and the critical theory of the capitalist state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, R. (2017). The politics of the precariat: From populism to Lulista hegemony. Leiden: Brill Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Breman, J., & van der Linden, M. (2014). Informalizing the economy: The return of the social question at a global level. Development and Change, 45, 920–940. doi: 10.1111/dech.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345. doi: 10.1080/14747731003669669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., & Konings, M. (2017). Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammack, P. (2004). What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy, 9(2), 189–211. doi: 10.1080/1356346042000218069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2017). Indian income inequality, 1922–2014: From British Raj to billionaire Raj? (Wealth & Income Database World working paper series No. 2017/11). Retrieved from http://wid.world/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ChancelPiketty2017WIDworld.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2014). Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2007). The development of capitalism in Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, K. (2008). New social movements in Russia: A challenge to the dominant model of power relationships? Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24(1), 68–89. doi: 10.1080/13523270701840472
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L. (2016). The southern question and the Irish question: A social movement landscape with migrants. In O. G. Augustin & M. B. Jørgensen (Eds.), Solidarity without borders: Gramscian perspectives on migration and civil society alliances (pp. 113–131). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L., & Nilsen, A. G. (2014). We make our own history: Marxism and social movements in the twilight of neoliberalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2004). The third way and the third world: Poverty reduction and social inclusion strategies in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. Review of International Political Economy, 12(2), 226–263. doi: 10.1080/09692290500105524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse Research Institute. (2017, November). Global Wealth Report 2017. Zurich: Credit Suisse. Retrieved from publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=4B23E1E9-95A7-AA12-2B4C2E0FDFF97EC5
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. (2012). Double movements and pendular forces: Polanyian perspectives on the neoliberal age. Current Sociology, 60(1), 3–27. doi: 10.1177/0011392111426645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, M. (2010). Wageless life. New Left Review, 66, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ettlinger, N. (2007). Precarity unbound. Alternatives, 32(3), 319–340. doi: 10.1177/030437540703200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B., & McChesney, R. W. (2012). The endless crisis: How monopoly-finance capital produces stagnation and upheaval from the USA to China. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabowitsch, M. (2016). Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghai, M. (2015). A model for universal social security coverage: The experience of the BRICS countries. International Social Security Review, 68(3), 99–118. doi: 10.1111/issr.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1998). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2002). Gramsci cannot speak: Presentations and interpretations of Gramsci's concept of the subaltern. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/089356902101242242
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, J., & Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and reclaiming the state after crisis. Development and Change, 43, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, C. (2012). Life in debt: Times of care and violence in neoliberal Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., & Scully, B. (2015). A hidden counter-movement? Precarity, politics, and social protection before and beyond the neoliberal era. Theory and Society, 44&45(5), 415–444. doi: 10.1007/s11186-015-9256-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2017a). Is global inequality getting better or worse? A critique of the World Bank’s convergence narrative. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 2208–2222. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1333414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2017b). The divide: A brief guide to global inequality and its solutions. London: William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., & du Toit, A. (2013). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion, and chronic poverty. In A. Shepherd & J. Brunt (Eds.), Chronic poverty: Concepts, causes and policy (pp. 134–160). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H. (2016). The China boom: Why China will not rule the world. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayadev, A., Motiram, S., & Vakulabharanam, V. (2011). Patterns of wealth disparities in India: 1991–2002. In S. Ruparelia, S. Reddy, J. Harriss, & S. Corbridge (Eds.), Understanding India’s new political economy: A great transformation? (pp. 81–100). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., & Sumner, A. (2012). Poor countries or poor people? Development assistance and the new geography of global poverty. Journal of International Development, 24(6), 686–695. doi: 10.1002/jid.2861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2015). Capitalist mutations in emerging, intermediate and peripheral neoliberalism. In P. Bond & A. Garcia (Eds.), BRICS: An anti-capitalist critique (pp. 70–96). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. (2007). Poverty reduction through liberalisation? Neoliberalism and the myth of global convergence. Review of International Studies, 33(3), 415–434. doi: 10.1017/S0260210507007589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. (2008). ‘Poverty’s fall’/China’s rise: Global convergence or new forms of uneven development? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(3), 353–372. doi: 10.1080/00472330802078451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. (2015). The BRICs, US ‘decline’ and global transformations. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. (Ed.). (2016). The rise and fall of emerging powers: Globalisation, US power and the global north-south divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K. (2007). Against the law: Labor protests in China's rustbelt and sunbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M. (2013). Regimes of dispossession: From steel towns to special economic zones. Development and Change, 44(2), 381–407. doi: 10.1111/dech.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallon, F. E. (1995). Peasant and nation: The making of postcolonial Mexico and Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, D. (2010). Global slump: The economics and politics of crisis and resistance. Oakland: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, G. A. (2013). Citizens and ‘squatters’: The contested subject of public policy in neoliberal Mumbai. Ethics and Social Welfare, 7(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2013.779007
   Google Scholar
• Millar, K. (2014). The precarious present: Wageless labor and disrupted life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cultural Anthropology, 29(1), 32–53. doi: 10.14506/ca29.1.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosoetsa, S., Stillerman, J., & Tilly, C. (2016). Precarious labor, south and north: An introduction. International Labor and Working-Class History, 89, 5–19. doi: 10.1017/S0147547916000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2010). A relational approach to durable poverty, inequality and power. Journal of Development Studies, 46(7), 1156–1178. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.487095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, R. (2013). The precariat: A view from the south. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747–762. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, P. (2015). Between old and new: Struggles in contemporary South Africa. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(2), 436–445. doi: 10.1215/00382876-2862809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayyar, D. (2016). BRICS, developing countries and global governance. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 575–591. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1116365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception. Theory, Culture and Society, 25(7-8), 51–72. doi: 10.1177/0263276408097796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson, D. (2015). Class, precarity, and anxiety under neoliberal global capitalism: From denial to resistance. Theory and Psychology, 25(2), 184–201. doi: 10.1177/0959354315580607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, I. (2015). Southern insurgency: The coming of the global working class. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. B., & Nilsen, A. G. (Eds.). (2016). Social movements and the state in India: Deepening democracy? London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A. G. (2015). For a historical sociology of state–society relations in the study of subaltern politics. In A. G. Nilsen & S. Roy (Eds.), New subaltern politics: Reconceptualizing hegemony and resistance in contemporary India (pp. 31–53). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A. G. (2016). Power, resistance and development in the global south: Notes towards a critical research agenda. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(3), 269–287. doi: 10.1007/s10767-016-9224-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A. G., & Roy, S. (2015). Reconceptualizing hegemony and resistance in contemporary India. In A. G. Nilsen & S. Roy (Eds.), New subaltern politics: Reconceptualizing hegemony and resistance in contemporary India (pp. 1–27). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. (2012). The rise of the ‘B(R)IC variety of capitalism’ – towards a new phrase of organized capitalism? In H. Overbeek & B. van Aapeldoorn (Eds.), Neoliberalism in crisis (pp. 117–137). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1972). Advanced capitalism and the welfare state. Advanced Capitalism and the Welfare State, 2(4), 479–488.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the welfare state. (J. Keane, Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. (2013). The growth map: Economic opportunity in the BRICs and beyond. London: Portfolio Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. (2017). An economy for the 99%. Oxfam. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-economy-for-99-percent-160117-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panitch, L., & Gindin, S. (2012). The making of global capitalism: The political economy of American empire. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Paret, M. (2016). Towards a precarity agenda. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberalism reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2007). Conceptualizing neoliberalism, thinking Thatcherism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 26–50). New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, J. N. (2018). Multipolar globalization: Emerging economics and development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prashad, V. (2012). The poorer nations: A possible history of the global south. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M. (2009). A comparative perspective on poverty reduction in Brazil, China and India (World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 5080). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1492560
   Google Scholar
• Roseberry, W. (1994). Hegemony and the languages of contention. In J. M. Gilbert & D. Nugent (Eds.), Everyday forms of state formation: Revolution and the negotiation of rule in modern Mexico (pp. 355–366). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A., & Morais, L. (2014). Mass protests: Brazilian spring or Brazilian malaise? Socialist Register, 2014, 227–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, R. (2011). Polanyi and post-neoliberalism in the global south: Dilemmas of re-embedding the economy. New Political Economy, 16(4), 415–443. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2010.504300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, S., & Ebenau, M. (2012). After neoliberalism? Brazil, India, and China in the global economic crisis. Globalizations, 9(4), 487–501. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2012.699917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, B. (2016a). Precarity north and south: A southern critique of Guy standing. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 160–173. doi: 10.15173/glj.v7i2.2521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & West, D. (2012). Social movements in the world-system: The politics of crisis and transformation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Starrs, S. (2014). The chimera of global convergence. New Left Review, 87, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Stuermer, M. (2009). Putin and the rise of Russia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A. (2012). Where do the world’s poor live? A new update. IDS Working Papers, 2012(393), 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00393.x
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2013a). Human development report 2013: The rise of the south. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2013b). Humanity divided: Confronting inequality in developing countries. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Von Holdt, K., Langa, M., Molapo, S., Mogapi, N., Ngubeni, K., Dlamini, J., & Kirsten, A. (2011). The smoke that calls: Insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa; eight case studies of community protest and xenophobic violence. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation & Society, Work and Development Institute. Retrieved from https://www.csvr.org.za/docs/thesmokethatcalls.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Von Schnitzler, A. (2016). Democracy’s infrastructure: Techno-politics and protest after apartheid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). Inequality and economic development in Brazil. World Bank Country Study. (Compiled by C. Velez, R. Paes de Barros, & F. H. G. Ferreira). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). Poverty and shared prosperity 2016: Taking on inequality. Washington, DC: Author. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0958-3
   Google Scholar