Philanthrocapitalism as a Neoliberal (Development Agenda) artefact: philanthropic discourse and hegemony in (financing for) international developmentFootnote^*

* A very preliminary version of this paper was released as a Documento de Trabajo 2018/01, Departamento de Economia, Universidad de Leon.

References

• Ayers, A., & Saad-Filho, A. (2015). Democracy against neoliberalism: Paradoxes, limitations, transcendence. Critical Sociology, 41(4–5), 597–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1985). L’aventure sémiologique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, K., & van Waeyenberge, E. (2018). Unpacking the public private partnership revival. Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 577–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, C. H. (2015). Behavioural economics, experimentalism and the marketization of development. Economy and Society, 44(4), 567–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthro-capitalism: How the rich can save the world. London: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, P., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2018). The international dimension of financialization in developing and emerging economies. Development & Change, 49(2), 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons practiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (1995). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Busman, D. S., Jusoff, K., Saman, D., & Meisantti. (2013). The hegemony of capitalism through philanthropy in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 26, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. (2015). ‘Access to finance’ and the death of development in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(1), 139–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T., & Jarvis, D. (2015a). The new politics of development: Citizens, civil society, and the evolution of neoliberal development policy. Globalizations, 12(3), 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T., & Jarvis, D. (2015b). Markets and development: Civil society, citizens, and the politics of neoliberalism. Globalizations, 12(3), 277–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-S., Weiss, L., & Fine, B. (2012). Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Clammer, J. (2017). What (if anything) can economic anthropology say to neoliberal development? Toward new anthropologies of capitalism and its alternatives. Dialectical Anthropology, 41(2), 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vecchis, G. (2015). Unequal geographies. J-Reading-Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 2, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., Thys, S., & Xhauflair, V. (2007). Beyond philanthropy: When philanthropy becomes social entrepreneurship. In 6th Conference of the European Research Network on Philanthropy (pp. 1–33), Riga.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2016). Neoliberalism: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Jilberto, A., & Mommen, A. (1996). Setting the neoliberal development agenda: Structural adjustment and export-led industrialization. In A. Fernández-Jilberto & A. Mommen (Eds.), Liberalization in the developing world (pp. 1–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. (2010). Neoliberalism as financialisation. In A. Saad-Filho & G. Yalman (Eds.), Transitions to neoliberalism in middle-income countries (pp. 11–23). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B., & Saad-Filho, A. (2014). Politics of neoliberal development: Washington consensus and post-Washington consensus. In H. Weber (Ed.), The politics of development (pp. 154–166). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2017). Critical social theory and sustainable development: The role of class, capitalism and domination in a dialectical analysis of un/sustainability. Sustainable Development, 25(5), 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay, C., & Ilcan, S. (2017). Leaving no-one behind? The politics of destination in the 2030 sustainable development goals. Globalizations, 14(3), 337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Arias, J. (2008). International finance and development: Opportunity or threat? CEPAL Review, 96, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Arias, J. (2013). The systemic approach to international financing for development and the need for a world tax and financial organization. European Journal of Development Research, 25(1), 60–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Arias, J. (2015). International financialization and the systemic approach to international financing for development. Global Policy, 6(1), 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975). Cuaderni del carcere. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, S., Buse, K., & Kapilashrami, A. (2017). Gender blind? An analysis of global public-private partnerships for health. Globalization and Health, 13, 26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, A., & Manzi, T. (1999). Managing the ‘underclass’: Interpreting the moral discourse of housing management. Urban Studies, 36(1), 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D., Wald, N., & Guiney, T. (2016). Development and neoliberalism. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 130–141). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. (2013). Foundation and the discourse of philanthropy. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35(1), 106–127.
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski, E., & Stockhammer, E. (2017). Financialisation in emerging economies: A systematic overview and comparison with anglo-saxon economies. Economic and Political Studies, 5(1), 60–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedir, A., Elhiraika, A., Chinzara, Z., & Sandjong, D. (2017). Growth and development finance required for achieving sustainable development Goals (SDGs) in Africa. African Development Review, 29(S1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Klak, T., & Myers, G. (1997). The discursive tactics of neoliberal development in small Third world countries. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 28(2), 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, B. (2006). Challenges to neoliberal hegemony in Bolivia. Antipode, 38(2), 304–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. (1985). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Languille, S. (2017). Public private partnerships in education and health in the global South: A literature review. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33(2), 142–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lipovetsky, G. (1992). Le crépuscule du devoir. L’éthique indolore des nouveaux temps démocratiques. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Baker, C. (2016). Ordinary aristocrats. The discursive construction of philanthropists as ethical leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKillop, E. (2018). How do empty signifiers lose credibility? The case of commissioning in English local government. Critical Policy Studies, 12(2), 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, J., & Seitz, K. (2015). Philanthropic power and development. Who shapes the agenda? Aachen/Berlin/Bonn/New York: Misereor/Global Policy Forum/Brot für die Wel.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2012). Philanthrocapitalism and its critics. Poetics, 40(2), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mediavilla, J., & Garcia-Arias, J. (2018). Philanthrocapitalism and hegemony in (financing for) development. The philanthropic discourse as a neoliberal (development agenda) artefact (Documento de Trabajo 2018/01). Departamento de Economia, Universidad de Leon.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchel, K., & Sparke, M. (2016). The new Washington consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode, 48(3), 724–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, M. (2008). “Building a culture”: The construction and evolution of venture philanthropy as a new organizational field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Quarterly, 37(2), 324–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, M., & Stone, D. (2016). The new philanthropy: Private power in international development policy? In J. Grugel & D. Hammett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of international development (pp. 297–313). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, B. (2012). Capitalist philanthropy and hegemonic partnerships. Third World Quarterly, 33(7), 1191–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, B. (2013). The politics of philanthropic and welfare governance: The case of Turkey. European Journal of Development Research, 25(2), 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson, J. (2014). Value chains, neoliberalism and development practice: The Indonesian experience. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 38–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neveling, P. (2017). The political economy machinery: Toward a critical anthropology of development as a contested capitalist practice. Dialectical Anthropology, 41(2), 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Paris declaration on aid and effectiveness. Paris: Development Assistance Committee.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2008). Accra action agenda. Paris: Development Assistance Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzigati, S. (2011). Plutocracy with a pleasant philanthropic face. Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ips-dc.org/plutocracy_with_a_pleasant_philanthropic_face/
   Google Scholar
• Pradella, L., & Marois, T. (2014). Polarizing development: Alternatives to neoliberalism and the crisis. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rückert, A. (2006). Towards an inclusive-neoliberal regime of development: From the Washington to the post-Washington consensus. Labour, Capital and Society, 39(1), 34–67.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. (2016). Climate, water, and livelihood skills: A post-development reading of the SDGs. Globalizations, 13(6), 952–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Traub, G., & Sachs, J. (2015, June 18). Financing sustainable development: Implementing the SDGs through effective investment strategies and partnerships (Working Paper). Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), Revised Version.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Soederberg, S. (2013). Universalising financial inclusion and the securitisation of development. Third World Quarterly, 34(4), 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soederberg, S. (2017). Universal access to affordable housing? Interrogating an elusive development goal. Globalizations, 14(3), 343–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39(1), 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telleria, J. (2018). Can we ‘transform our world’ without affecting international power relations? A political analysis of the United Nations development agenda. Globalizations. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2018.1467744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorup, M. (2013). Pro bono? On philanthrocapitalism as ideological answer to inequality. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 13(3), 555–576.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., & Jarowski, A. (2017). Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege and power. Social Semiotics, 27(3), 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2015a). Addis Ababa action agenda. Resolution A/RES/69/313 adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2015. Third International Conference on Financing for Development, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2015b). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Resolution A/RES/70/1, adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2016). Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. Language and Peace, 10, 47–142.
   Google Scholar
• van Waeyenberge, E. (2017). The post-Washington Consensus. In H. Veltmeyer & P. Bowles (Eds.), The essential guide to critical development studies (pp. 205–214). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Waeyenberge, E., & Bargawi, H. (2016). Financing economic development. Theoretical debates and empirical trends (FESSUD Working Paper Series No 139).
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M. (2005). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 344–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K. (2007). The emergence of ‘neo-philanthropy’: A new discursive space in welfare policy? Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (2013). Finance versus democracy? Theorizing finance in society. Work, Employment and Society, 27(3), 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, H. (2017). Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 sustainable development Goals Agenda. Globalizations, 14(3), 399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. (1997). Reappraising the race, class, gender equation: A critical theoretical perspective. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 67(3), 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirgau, J. S., Farley, K. W., & Jensen, C. (2010). Is business discourse colonizing philanthropy? A critical discourse analysis of (product) red. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 611–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepeda, C. S. (2006). The language of hegemony: Discourse, power and freedom in El Salvador's neoliberal development agenda: The CAFTA case. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
   Google Scholar