Transnational policy entrepreneurs and the cultivation of influence: individuals, organizations and their networks

References

• Ackrill, R., & Kay, A. (2011). Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimi, D. (2015). ‘Going global’: Policy entrepreneurship of the global commission on drug policy. Public Administration, 93(4), 874–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arieli, T., & Cohen, N. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and post-conflict cross-border cooperation: A conceptual framework and the Israeli–Jordanian case. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22, 571–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Stone, D. (2013). The changing fortunes of a policy entrepreneur: The case of Ross Garnaut. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2011). Chairs as policy entrepreneurs in multilateral negotiations. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 653–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (2014a). Studying the international Crisis Group. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (2014b). On methodology and myths: Exploring the international Crisis Group’s organisational culture. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 616–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouteligier, S. (2011). Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M. (2009). The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union – The role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 469–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. (2015). Modes of cognitive praxis in transnational alternative policy groups. Globalizations, 12(5), 710–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, R. G., & Scott, J. M. (2009). Choosing to lead: Understanding congressional foreign policy entrepreneurs. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desa, G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ruggiero, E., Cohen, J., Cole, D., & Forman, L. (2015). Public health agenda setting in a global context: The international labor organization’s decent work agenda. American Journal of Public Health, 105(4), e58–e61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, L. (2007). Media and global conflict: An international Crisis Group case study. Pacific Journalism Review, 13(2), 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2017). The incorrigible optimist: A memoir. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faling, M., Biesbroek, R., & Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. (2018). The strategizing of policy entrepreneurs towards the global alliance for climate-smart agriculture. Global Policy, 9(3), 408–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. (2016). Toward a theory of non-state actors’ intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 31(4), 465–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldbrandsson, K., & Fossum, B. (2009). An exploration of the theoretical concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena. Health Promotion International, 24(4), 434–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigat, S. (2014). Educating into Liberal peace: The international Crisis Group’s contribution to an emerging global governmentality. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 563–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). Transnational organizing: Issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization, 23(5), 722–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herweg, N. (2015). Explaining European agenda-setting using the multiple streams framework: The case of European natural gas regulation. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (2010). Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICG. (2010). Fifteen years on the front lines 1995-2010. Brussels: International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. (2012). Annual Report 2013. 2012 Review, Plans for 2013. International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. (2013). About Crisis Group. International Crisis Group. Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/about.aspx
   Google Scholar
• ICG. (2015). About Crisis Group. International Crisis Group. Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/about.aspx
   Google Scholar
• ICG. (2016). Seizing the moment: From early warning to early action. Brussels: International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta Raney, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Transnational activist networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed). New York, NY: Harper Collins, Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kostic, R. (2014). Transnational think-tanks: Foot soldiers in the battlefield of ideas? Examining the role of the ICG in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2000–01. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 634–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, A. (2003). The European Union’s Africa policy: The commission as policy entrepreneur in the CFSP. European Foreign Affairs Review, 8(2), 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. (2009). Presentation to the Informal Network of DAC Meeting, Dublin. Retrieved from http://www.simonmaxwell.eu/images/stories/ppts/dublin%20sm%20new.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhtarov, F., & Gerlak, A. (2013). River basin organizations in the global water discourse: An exploration of agency and strategy. Global Governance, 19(2), 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nay, O. (2012). How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32(1), 53–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg, J. (2005, April 15). International Crisis Group: Who pays the piper? The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research. Retrieved from http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27a/201.html
   Google Scholar
• Oborn, E., Barrett, M., & Exworthy, M. (2011). Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy: The case of London health reform. Public Administration, 89, 325–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. (2009). Agenda-setting and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 781–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, F., & Olsson, P. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs, global networks, and the emergence of international institutions for ecosystem-based management. Marine Policy, 38, 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, O. J. (2019). Knowledge networks, scientific communities, and evidence-informed policy. In D. Stone & K. Moloney (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration (pp. 383–400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shwed, U., & Bearman, P. S. (2010). The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 817–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, G. (2014). The international Crisis Group and the manufacturing and communicating of crises. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 581–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (1999). Global politics and transnational social movement strategies: The transnational campaign against trade in toxic wastes. In H. Kriesi, D. D. Porta, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 170–188). London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, P. (2013). Flex actors and philanthropy in (post-) conflict Arenas: Soros’ open society foundations in the post-Yugoslav Space. Croatian Political Science Review, 50(5), 114–138.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). R2p: From idea to norm—and action? Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 22–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, L. (2003). International deployment of shame, second-best responses, and norm entrepreneurship: The campaign to Ban Landmines and the landmine Ban treaty. The Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 20, 561.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. (2012). Internal affairs: How the structure of NGOS transforms human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. (2008). Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: Challenges of “technical Infeasibility”. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2013). Policy entrepreneurship, institutional constraints, and local policy innovation in China. China Review, 13(2), 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interviews
   Google Scholar