Democracy as a transitional compass: women’s participation in South Africa and Kerala, India

References

• Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANC. (1994). Reconstruction and development program. Johannesburg: Umanyano.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, J. (1996). Against the Current: Labour and economic policy in South Africa. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. (2005). Decentralizing government and decentering gender: Lessons from local government reform in South Africa. Politics and Society, 33(2), 253–276. doi: 10.1177/0032329205275194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chibber, P. K. (2002). Why are some women politically active? The household, public space, and political participation in India. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 409–429. doi: 10.1177/002071520204300310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2002). Locating citizen participation. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), i–x. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devika, J. (2007). En-gendering individuals: The language of re-forming in early 20th century Keralam. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Devika, J., & Thampi, B. V. (2012). New lamps for old? Gender paradoxes of political decentralisation in Kerala. New Delhi: Kali for Women Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörre, K. (2018). Democracy, not capitalism – or: Expropriate Zuckerberg! Unpublished manuscript presented on November 28, Workshop on Sociological Marxism, Kolleg Postwachstumsgesellschaften (Institute for the Study of Degrowth), Jena University, Jena, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking about empowered participatory governance. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (pp. 3–44). London: Verso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M. (2003). Women’s political effectiveness – a conceptual framework. In A. M. Goetz & S. Hassim (Eds.), No shortcuts to power: African women in politics and policymaking (pp. 29–79). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M. (2009). Governing women: Women’s political effectiveness in contexts of democratization and governance reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassim, S. (2014). Persistent inequalities: A comparative view of Indian and South African experiences of local government quotas for women. Politikon, 41(1), 85–102. doi: 10.1080/02589346.2014.885674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, P. (2001). Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society, 29(1), 131–163. doi: 10.1177/0032329201029001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, P. (2009). Making citizens from below: India’s emerging local government. In G. Bland & C. J. Arnson (Eds.), Democratic deficits: Addressing challenges to sustainability and consolidation around the world. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved from https://wilsoncenter.org/topics/pubs/ Democratic_Deficits2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heller, P., Harilal, K. N., & Chaudhuri, S. (2007). Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development, 35(4), 626–648. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, T., & Heller, P. (2003). Democracy and development: Decentralized planning in Kerala. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (pp. 77–110). London: Verso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2011). Between affiliation and autonomy: Navigating pathways of women’s empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh. Development and Change, 42(2), 499–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01703.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. (1997). Crazy for democracy: Women in grassroots movements. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D. (2003). Rethinking governance: Empirical lessons challenge orthodoxy (World Bank Working Paper). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpma/0308007.html
   Google Scholar
• Madhok, S. (2013). Rethinking agency: Developmentalism, gender and rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, H. (2001). South Africa: Limits to change: The political economy of transformation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, C. (2000). Engendering citizenship: Gendered spaces of democracy in South Africa. Political Geography, 19, 627–651. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, C. (2003). ‘Bringing government to the people’: Women, local governance and community participation in South Africa. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 34(4), 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, B. (2012). Global income inequality by the numbers: History and now (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6259). Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-6259
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2004). Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics. Wagadu, 1, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2006). Feminist praxis, citizenship and informal politics: Reflections on South Africa’s anti-eviction campaign. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(2), 194–218. doi: 10.1080/14616740600612830
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. (1998). Women’s community activism and feminist activist research. In N. Naples (Ed.), Community activism and feminist politics (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N., & Desai, M. (2002). Women’s local and translocal responses: An introduction to the chapters. In N. Naples & M. Desai (Eds.), Women’s activism and globalization (pp. 11–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oommen, M. A. (2008). Microfinance and poverty alleviation: The case of Kerala’s Kudumbashree (Working Paper 17). Kochi: Centre for Socio-economic and Environmental Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, L., & von Lieres, B. (2011). Expert advocacy for the marginalised: How and why democratic mediation matters to deepening democracy in the global south (IDS Working Paper 2011/364). Retrieved from http://www.drc-citizenship.org/system/assets/1052734740/original/1052734740-piper_etal.2011-expert.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seema, T. N., & Mukherjee, V. (2000, May 23–27). Gender governance and citizenship in decentralized planning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Democratic Decentralization, Thiruvananthapuram.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tripartite Alliance. (1995). The need for an effective ANC-led political center. The African Communist, 142(Third quarter).
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2010). African women’s movements: Transforming political Landscapes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, E., & Macun, I. (1998). A trend towards co-determination? Case studies of South African enterprises. Law, Democracy and Development, 5, 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., Thampi, B. V., Narayana, D., Nandigama, S., & Bhattacharya, D. (2011). Performing participatory citizenship – politics and power in Kerala’s KudumbashreeProgramme. Journal of Development Studies, 47(8), 1261–1280. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.527949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2008). The roots of participatory democracy: Democratic communists in South Africa and Kerala. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2014). The solidarity economy and social transformation. In V. Satgar (Ed.), The solidarity economy alternative: Emerging theory and practice (pp. 37–63). Durban: UKZN Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2017a). Practicing democratic communism in Kerala, India. In L. Pantich & G. Albo (Eds.), The socialist register: Democracy (pp. 244–262). London: Merlin Press and Leftword Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2017b, November). ‘Practicing’ women’s agency and the struggle for transformation in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35(4), 525–543. doi: 10.1080/02589001.2017.1370079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2018). Women in rural South Africa: A post-wage existence and the role of the state. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(4), 392–410. doi: 10.1108/EDI-05-2017-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolin, S. (2010). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1997). World development report 1997: The state in a changing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000). World development report 2000–2001: Attacking poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar