Nature and the international: towards a materialist understanding of societal multiplicity

References

• Acuto, M., & Curtis, S. (2013). Reassembling international relations theory. Houndmills: Palgrave Pivot, Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, B. B. (2016). Producing the climate: States, scientists, and the constitution of global governance objects. International Organization, 71, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anievas, A., & Nisancioglu, K. (2015). How the West came to rule. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., & Cavelty, M. D. (2016). A theory of actor-network for cyber-security. European Journal of International Security, 1(2), 176–198. doi: 10.1017/eis.2016.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, D., & Tickner, A. (2017). International relations in the prison of colonial modernity. International Relations, 31(1), 71–75. doi: 10.1177/0047117817691349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N., & Cirkovic, M. M. (Eds.). (2011). Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. (2017). Distinguishing a minimalist role for grand theorizing. International Relations, 31(1), 85–89. doi: 10.1177/0047117817691352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., Dalby, S., & Levine, D. J. (2016). Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 499–523. doi: 10.1177/0305829816636674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state: Traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis. Science, 169(3947), 733–738. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3947.733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2018). Anthropocene, capitalocene and liberal cosmopolitan IR: A response to Burke et al.’s ‘planet politics’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 46(2), 190–208. doi: 10.1177/0305829817715247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Park, T., Wang, X., Piao, S., Xu, B., Chaturvedi, R. K., … Myneni, R. B. (2019). China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature Sustainability, 2(2), 122–129. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., & Foster, J. B. (2009). Ecological imperialism and the global metabolic rift: Unequal exchange and the guano/nitrates trade. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(3–4), 311–334. doi: 10.1177/0020715209105144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428. doi: 10.1007/s11186-005-1993-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. (2013). The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 399–412. doi: 10.1177/0305829813486849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2013a). The rise and fall of the global climate polity. In H. Bulkeley & J. Stripple (Eds.), Governing the climate: New approaches to rationality, power and politics (pp. 219–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2013b). Constructing a global polity. Theory, discourse and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2014). The Green Legacy of 1989: Revolutions, environmentalism and the global age. Political Studies, 62(2), 309–325. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2017a). The ‘nature’ of international relations: From geopolitics to the Anthropocene. Ch. 9. In C. Eroukhmanoff & M. Harker (Eds.), Reflections on the posthuman in international relations – the Anthropocene, security and ecology (pp. 102–118). Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2017b). The international politics of geoengineering: The feasibility of Plan B for tackling climate change. Security Dialogue, 48(4), 297–315. doi: 10.1177/0967010617704142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2018). Societies are not the only source of multiplicity. International Relations, 32(2), 243–245. doi: 10.1177/0047117818774722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, A. W. (2004). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe 900-1900 (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, D. E., & Hobden, D. S. (2013). Posthuman international relations: Complexity, ecologism and global politics. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2017). The emancipatory project of posthumanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2014). Rethinking geopolitics: Climate security in the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 5(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, A. (2013). Marxism in IR: Condemned to a realist fate? European Journal of International Relations, 19(1), 27–48. doi: 10.1177/1354066111416021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. (1999). Bringing nature back in: Geopolitical theory from the Greeks to the global era. In D. Deudney & R. Matthew (Eds.), Contested grounds: Security and conflict in the new environmental politics (pp. 25–57). New York: Albany State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. (2000). Geopolitics as theory: Historical security materialism. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 77–107. doi: 10.1177/1354066100006001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, G. (2018). When pathogens determine the territory: Toward a concept of non-human borders. European Journal of International Relations, 24(2), 391–413. doi: 10.1177/1354066117710998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. K. (1997). How chiefs come to power: The political economy in prehistory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2011). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2017). Defiant earth: The fate of humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. (2016). Action, technology, and the homogenisation of place: Why climate change is antithetical to political action. Globalizations, 13(1), 62–77. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1040282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2014). Conclusions: Assemblage theory and its future. In M. Acuto & S. Curtis (Eds.), Reassembling international theory. Assemblage thinking and international relations (pp. 118–130). Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., & Shearing, C. (2017). Security in the Anthropocene: Reflections on safety and care (Vol. 30). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hobden, S. (2015). Posthumanism. In Critical environmental politics (pp. 175–183). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A. (2012). Global ecology and unequal exchange: Fetishism in a zero-sum world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A., & Crumley, C. L. (Eds.). (2016). The world system and the Earth system: Global socioenvironmental change and sustainability since the neolithic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T. (2017). Out of one prison, into another? Comments on Rosenberg. International Relations, 31(1), 81–84. doi: 10.1177/0047117817691351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. (2013). The revenge of geography. What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. (2007). The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: Notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(3), 435–454. doi: 10.1080/09557570701574154
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E., & Zolkos, M. (2016). The recognition of nature in international relations. Chapter 8. In P. Hayden & K. Schick (Eds.), Recognition and global politics: Critical encounters between state and world (pp. 139–155). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krarup, T. M., & Blok, A. (2011). Unfolding the social: Quasi-actants, virtual theory, and the new empiricism of Bruno Latour. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 42–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01991.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2016). Onus Orbis Terrarum: About a possible shift in the definition of sovereignty. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1177/0305829816640608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2006). The climate as political space: On the territorialisation of the global carbon cycle. Review of International Studies, 32(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1017/S0260210506006991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, A. (2018). The progress of this storm: Nature and society in a warming world. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69. doi: 10.1177/2053019613516291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power volume I: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1949). The German ideology. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1958). Economic and philosphical manuscripts of 1844. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Economic-Philosophic-Manuscripts-1844.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1857/1973). Grundrisse. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Matin, K. (2013). Recasting Iranian modernity: International relations and social change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., & Acuto, M. (2015). The global governance of large technical systems. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 660–683. doi: 10.1177/0305829814561540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2014). Only human? A worldly approach to security. Security Dialogue, 45(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1177/0967010613515015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. (1948/1985). Politics among nations. ( Revised by Kenneth W. Thompson). New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Lane, R. (2017). IPE and the environment in the age of the Anthropocene. In Traditions and trends in global environmental politics (pp. 136–153). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, P. (2015). The global village myth: Distance, war, and the limits of power. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2006). Why is there no international historical sociology? European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 307–340. doi: 10.1177/1354066106067345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2010). Basic problems in the theory of uneven and combined development. Part II: Unevenness and political multiplicity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(1), 165–189. doi: 10.1080/09557570903524270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2016). International relations in the prison of political science. International Relations, 30(2), 127–153. doi: 10.1177/0047117816644662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2017). The elusive international. International Relations, 31(1), 90–103. doi: 10.1177/0047117817691353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, K. (2017). Marx in the Anthropocene: Value, metabolic rift, and the non-Cartesian dualism. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, 4(1–2), 276–295.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B., & Walters, W. (2016). Bruno Latour encounters international relations: An interview. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 524–546. doi: 10.1177/0305829816641497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. (1971). The concept of nature in Marx. London: NLBæ.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (1993). Environment on the periphery of international relations. An explanation. Environmental Politics, 2(4), 28–45. doi: 10.1080/09644019308414100
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, T. (2012). Human nature and the limits of the self: Hans Morgenthau on love and power. International Studies Review, 14(2), 201–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spykman, N. J. (1938). Geography & foreign policy, I. American Political Science Review, 32(1), 28–50. doi: 10.2307/1949029
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkner, N. (2011). Managing pathogenic circulation: Human security and the migrant health assemblage in Thailand. Security Dialogue, 42(3), 239–259. doi: 10.1177/0967010611405393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (2014). Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security. Security Dialogue, 45, 101–118. doi: 10.1177/0967010613519162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(20), 6271–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220362110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijkman, A., & Rockström, J. (2013). Bankrupting nature: Denying our planetary boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. (2015). Tambora: The eruption that changed the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youatt, R. (2014). Interspecies relations, international relations: Rethinking anthropocentric politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(1), 207–223. doi: 10.1177/0305829814536946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. (2016). International relations in the Anthropocene. In K. Booth & T. Erskine (Eds.), International relations theory today (pp. 231–249). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar