Beyond the secular Anthropocene: Locke’s self-owning body, protestant translations of indigenous world-making, and the settler-colonial plantation economy

References

• Arneil, B. (1994). Trade, plantations, and property: John Locke and the economic defense of colonialism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 55(4), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneil, B. (1996). John Locke and America: The defense of English colonialism. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (2009). Free speech, blasphemy, and secular criticism. In T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, & S. Mahmood (Eds.), Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech. Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (2018). Secular translations: Nation-state, modern self, and calculative reason. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, S., & Bridge, G. (2015). Industrialization and environmental change. In T. Perreault, G. Bridge, & J. McCar (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 366–378). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1974). On the concept of history, Gesammelte Schriften I:2. Suhrkamp Verlag. (Original work published 1942)
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. A. (2002). Black rice: The African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. (1995). The invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the myth of modernity. Translated by Michael D. Barber. Continuum: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, B. (2016). Race, nature, and accumulation: A decolonial world-ecological analysis of Indian land Grabbing the Gambella province of Ethiopia [Unpublished Dissertation]. York University.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, B. (2020). Beyond the premise of conquest: Indigenous and Black earth-worlds in the Anthropocene debates. Globalizations, doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1859742
   Google Scholar
• Hechscher, E. (1934). Mercantilism, (Vol. 1, M. Shapiro, Trans). George Allan and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, T., Pearson, D. J., & Chavis, B. (2003). Peoplehood: A model for the extension of sovereignty in American Indian studies. Wicazo Sa Review, 18(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh, V. (2006). Cultivating and challenging the common: Lockean property, indigenous traditionalisms, and the problem of exclusion. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300233
   Google Scholar
• Ince, O. U. (2011). Enclosing in God's name, accumulating for mankind: Money, morality, and accumulation in John Locke's theory of property. The Review of Politics, 73(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000859
   Google Scholar
• Justice, D. H. (2008). ‘Go away water!’ Kinship Criticism and the decolonization imperative. In C. S. Womack, D. H. Justice, & C. B. Teuton (Eds.), Reasoning together: The native critics collective (pp. 147–169). University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, W. (2007). Christian moderns: Freedom and fetish in the mission encounter. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolia, Z. (2016). The aporia of indigeneity: (Dis)Enchanting identity and the modular nation form. Interventions, 18(4), 605–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1671). Letter from Lord Ashely to William Saile, 13 May. Shaftsbury paper, PRO Bundle, 48(55).
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1691). Some considerations. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/763
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1824 (1705–1707)). The works of John Locke, Vol. 7, essays and notes on St. Paul’s Epistles, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-the-works-vol-7-essays-and-notes-on-st-pauls-epistles
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1689)
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise on government (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.). Hacket. (Original work published 1690)
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. (2009). Religious reason and secular affect: An incommensurable divide? In T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, & S. Mahmood (Eds.), Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech (pp. 58–95). Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1985). A category of the mind. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. L. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, U. S. (1992). The anxiety of freedom: Imagination and individuality in Locke’s political thought. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, U. S. (1999). Liberalism and empire: A study in nineteenth-century British Liberal thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2005). The idea of Latin America. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanram, R. (1999). Black body: Women, colonialism and space. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D., Kosek, J., & Pandian, A. (2003). Race, nature, and the politics of difference. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2014). The capitalocene Part 1: On the nature & origins of our ecological crisis. Fernand Braudel Centre. http://www.jasonwmoore.com/uploads/The_Capitalocene__Part_I__June_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mun, T. (1664/1994). England’s treasure by foreign trade. Thomas Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, M. (2017). Beyond settler time: Temporal sovereignty and indigenous self-determination. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2013). Secularism and gender equality. In L. Cady & T. Fessenden (Eds.), Religion, the secular, and the politics of religious difference (pp. 25–47). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, P. (1995). Ceremonies of possession in Europe’s conquest of the New world, 1492–1640. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, P. (2001). American Pentimento: The invention of Indians and the pursuit of riches. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, V. (2010). Europe’s Indians: Producing racial difference, 1500–1900. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veracini, L. (2010). Settler colonialism: A theoretical overview. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (1974). Black majority: Negroes in colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation–an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. (2016). Anthropogenesis: Origins and endings in the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415581021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar