The credibility of regional policymaking: insights from South America

References

• Acharya, A. (2011). Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the third world. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. (Eds.). (2007). Crafting cooperation. Regional international institutions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, D., & Brumat, L. (2020). Political and legal responses to human mobility in South America in the context of the covid-19 crisis. More fuel for the fire? Frontiers in Human Dynamics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2020.592196
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (1998). Security communities. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinis, G. (2019). Regional intergovernmental organizations as catalysts for transnational policy diffusion: The case of UNASUR health. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 1111–1129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2011). Comparative regionalism: A new research agenda (KFG Working Paper). Freie Universität Berlin. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/kfgwp/wpseries/WorkingPaperKFG_28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., & Quaglia, L. (2018). The politics and economics of brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(8), 1089–1098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonaguro, F. (2019). Red de Institutos Nacionales de Cancer de Latinoamérica RINC-ALC. https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-biology/2019/06/26/red-de-institutos-nacionales-de-cancer-de-latinoamerica-rinc-alc/
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (2003). Security architecture in Asia: The interplay of regional and global levels. Pacific Review, 16(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000069660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in international society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L., & Baert, F. (2010). The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, B., Macovei, M. C., Van Langenhove, L., & Yeates, N. (Eds.). (2010). World-regional social policy and global governance: New research and policy agendas in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., Schmidtke, H., & Weise, T. (2020). The rise of democratic legitimation: Why international organizations speak the language of democracy. European Journal of International Relations, 26(3), 714–741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duina, F., & Lenz, T. (2017). Democratic legitimacy in regional economic organizations: The European Union in comparative perspective. Economy and Society, 46(3), 398–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2017.1377946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L., & Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in world politics: Regional organization and international order. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardini, G. L. (2010). The origins of Mercosur democratization and regionalism in South America. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garzón, J., & Nolte, D. (2018). The new minilateralism in regional economic governance: Crossregionalism and the Pacific alliance. In P. Riggirozzi & C. Wylde (Eds.), Routledge handbook of South American governance (pp. 173–189). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., Espinoza, M. V., Abdou, L. H., & Brumat, L. (2019). The dynamics of regional migration governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., Oberthür, S., & Mühleck, M. (2013). EU actorness in international institutions. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5), 849–865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12030
   Google Scholar
• Gomez Mera, L. (2008). How ‘new’ is the ‘new regionalism” in the Americas? The case of MERCOSUR. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.14
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, J., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). The quest for legitimacy in world politics – international institutions’ legitimation strategies. Review of International Studies, 42(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, B., & Tussie, D. (2015). UNSAUR health: A quiet revolution in health diplomacy in South America. Global Social Policy, 15(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018115599818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., & Bianculli, A. (Eds.). (2016). Regional organizations and social policy in Europe and Latin America: A space for social citizenship? Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Politicas Publicas y Derechos Humanos. (2016). Institucionalidad Pública en Derechos Humanos del Mercosur. http://www.ippdh.mercosur.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Resumen-IPPDH.2016-color.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, G. (2020). Dynamics of legitimation in regional organisations: The OAS and non state actors. Global Society, 34(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1756230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, G., & Lockhart, N. (2019). Legislators and regional organizations: The issue of legitimacy. Latin American Policy, 10(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. (2013). Overlapping regionalism, no integration: Conceptual issues and the Latin American experiences (EUI Working Paper, RSCAS 2013/20). European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W. (1999). The logic of regional integration: Europe and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondelli, M. (2018). Scaling up citizenship: The case of the statute of MERCOSUR citizenship. In P. Riggirozzi & C. Wylde (Eds.), Handbook of South American governance (pp. 426–441). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2008). The European constitutional settlement. World Economy, 31(1), 158–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, T. (2019). Latin America takes on Big Pharma. AULA Blog. https://aulablog.net/2019/02/19/latin-america-takes-on-big-pharma/
   Google Scholar
• Pan-American Health Organisation. (2015). Países del Mercosur y Estados Asociados concretaron mecanismo de compra de medicamentos de alto costo con el apoyo de la OPS. https://www.paho.org/uru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1000:paises-del-mercosur-y-estados-asociados-concretaron-mecanismo-de-compra-de-medicamentos-de-alto-costo-con-el-apoyo-de-la-ops&Itemid=451
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, D. (2014). La educación superior en el MERCOSUR: la acomodación entre las políticas domésticas y la política regional. Revista Perspectivas de Políticas Públicas, 3(6), 177–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18294/rppp.2014.658
   Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. (2005). Democracy from above: Regional organizations and democratization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2003). Hemispheric integration and subregionalism in the Americas. International Affairs, 79(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polverari, L., Bachtler, J., & van der Zwet, A. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of regional policy (European Policies Research Paper No 91). www.eprc-strath.eu/uploads/eprc/documents/PDF_files/EPRP_91.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Quiliconi, C. (2017). From open regionalism to neo-extractivism: A new geography of trade in Latin America? In J. Briceño Ruíz & I. Morales (Eds.), Post-hegemonic regionalism in the Americas. Toward a Pacific-Atlantic divide? (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quiliconi, C., & Rivera, R. (2019). Ideology and leadership in regional cooperation: The cases of defense and the world against drugs councils in Unasur. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 28(1), 219–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.28.1.8
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International crises of legitimacy. International Politics, 44(2–3), 157–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800182
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro Hoffmann, A., & van der Vleuten, A. (Eds.). (2007). Closing or widening the gap? Legitimacy and democracy in regional integration organizations. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Riesco, M. (2010). Binding material for a young giant? Regional policies in Latin America. In B. Deacon, M. Macovei, L. Van Langenhove, & N. Yeates (Eds.), World-regional social policy and global governance: New research and policy agendas in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America (pp. 108–139). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2014). Regionalism through social policy: Collective action and health diplomacy in South America. Economy and Society, 43(2), 432–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.881598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2015). Regionalism, activism, and rights: New opportunities for health diplomacy in South America. Review of International Studies, 41(2), 407–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051400028X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2017). Regional integration and welfare: Framing and advocating pro-poor norms through southern regionalisms. New Political Economy, 22(6), 661–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1311847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P., & Grugel, J. (2015). Regional governance and legitimacy in South America: The meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs, 91(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (Eds.). (2012). The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P., & Yeates, N. (2015). Locating regional health policy: Institutions, politics, and practices. Global Social Policy, 15(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018115599819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Schroeder, P. (2016). The legitimacy of regional institutions. In T. Borzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 579–599). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (2019). Referendum challenges to the EU’s policy legitimacy – and how the EU responds. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1426034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanahuja, J. A. (2012). Post-liberal regionalism in South America: The case of UNASUR (Working Paper RSCAS 2012/05). European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. (2008). Review article: Comparative regionalism: What might it be? Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00809.x
   Google Scholar
• SELA. (2010). Cooperation experiences in the health sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: Critical assessment and proposals for actions with a regional scope. Permanent Secretariat of SELA.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2014). The democratic output legitimacy of international organizations (Discussion Paper, SP IV 2014-101). Social Science Research Center, Technische Universität Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2016). Transparency and openness. In J. Katz Cogan, I. Hurt, & I. Johnstone (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international organizations (pp. 1170–1192). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Velde, D., Page, S., & Morrissey, O. (2006). Regional integration and poverty. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., & Sager, F. (2017). Toward a better understanding of implementation performance in the EU multi-level system. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314542. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/29498/Thomann_Sager%202017_JEPP_conclusion_%20accepted.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• UNASUR. (2009). Plan Quinquenal, 2010–2015. http://www.ins.gob.pe/repositorioaps/0/0/jer/rins_documentosunasur/PQ%20UNASUR%20Salud.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNASUR. (2011). Report of the Pro Tempore Secretariat, 2011. http://isags-unasul.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Informe-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Viner, J. (1950). The customs union issue, Carnegie endowment for international peace. Stevens & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates, N. (2014). The socialization of regionalism and the regionalization of social policy: Contexts, imperatives, and challenges. In A. Kaasch & P. Stubbs (Eds.), Transformations in global and regional social policies (pp. 17–43). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy and contestation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar