The challenges of economic integration in Latin America: searching for consensus in contexts of globalization. The case of MERCOSUR (1991–2019)

References

• Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo/IADB. (2002). El nuevo regionalismo en América Latina. En Más allá de las fronteras: el nuevo regionalismo en América latina, Informe 2002, cap. 2, cap.9.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten, F. (1997). Open regionalism. The World Economy, 20(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielschowsky, R. (1998). Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña. En CEPAL: Cincuenta años de pensamiento de la CEPAL. Textos seleccionados. Volumen I. Santiago de Chile, FCE-CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Blyde, J. S. (2006). Convergence dynamics in Mercosur. Journal of Economic Integration, 21(4), 784–815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2006.21.4.784
   Google Scholar
• Boito, A., & Berringer, T. (2014). Social classes, neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian Foreign Policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma. Latin American Perspectives, 41(5), 94–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14543790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botto, M. (2009). The role of epistemic communities in the makability of Mercosur. In M. Schulz & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), The makability of regionanlism (pp. 171–187). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Botto, M. (2015). La política comercial en el Mercosur y la deconstrucción de una idea: de mercado común sudamericano a una pragmática área de libre comercio. En M. Botto (Ed.), La Integración Regional en América: Quo Vadis? El Mercosur desde una perspectiva sectorial y comparada (pp. 45–110). Eudeba.
   Google Scholar
• Botto, M. (2017). El Mercosur y sus crisis: análisis de interpretaciones sobre el fracaso de la Integración regional sudamericana. Revista: Estado & comunes, revista de políticas y problemas públicos, 2(5), 132–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37228/estado_comunes.v2.n5.2017
   Google Scholar
• Botto, M., & Bianculli, A. (2011). Comparative asymmetric trade negotiations in the Southern Cone: FTAA and UE-Mercosur. En B. Sanoussi, P. De Lombaerde, & D. Tussie (Eds.), Asymmetric trade negotiations (pp. 98–116). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Botto, M., & Peixoto, J. (2010). The impact of academia on the negotiations on health and education services in Argentina: Challenges and opportunities. In M. Botto (Ed.), Research and international trade policy negotiations. Knowledge and power in Latin America (pp. 175–210). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Botto, M., & Quiliconi, C. (2010). The influence of academia on Mercosur’s tariff policy. In M. Botto (Ed.), Research and international trade policy negotiations. Knowledge and power in Latin America (pp. 144–174). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Briceño-Ruiz, J. (2017). Raúl Prebisch and the theory of regional economic integration. In M. E. Margulis (Ed.), The global political economy of Raúl Prebisch (pp. 61–77). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H.-J., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-)extractivism – a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 468–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burges, S. W. (2008). Consensual hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. International Relations, 22(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807087243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caichiolo, C. (2017). The Mercosur experience and theories of regional integration. Contexto Internacional, 39(1) Jan/Apr. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.20173901000
   Google Scholar
• Carranza, M. (2003). Can Mercosur survive? Domestic and international constraints on Mercosur. Latin American Politics and Society, 45(2), 67–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2003.tb00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodor, T. (2015). Neoliberal hegemony and the pink tide in Latin America: Breaking up with TINA? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccantell, P. (2001). NAFTA and the reconstruction of US hegemony: The raw materials foundations of economic competitiveness. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 26(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3341511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Bembi, M., & Bianco, C. (2018). El trilema del MERCOSUR. Políticas nacionales, integración económica y relacionamiento externo. En M. Vázquez (Ed.), El Mercosur. Geografía en disputa (pp. 97–167). Editorial Cicus.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. J. (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. (2013). Prospects for deepening Mercosur integration: Economic asymmetry and institutional deficits. Review of International Political Economy, 20(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.671763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECLAC. (1990). Changing production patterns with social equity. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• ECLAC. (1994). Open regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean. Economic integration as a contribution to changing production patterns with social equity. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Genna, G. M., & Hiroi, T. (2007). Brazilian regional power in the development of Mercosul. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 43–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X07306237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezmis, H. (2018). From neoliberalism to neo-developmentalism? The political economy of post-crisis Argentina (2002-2015). New Political Economy, 23(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1330877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mera, L. (2008). How ‘new’ is the ‘new regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of MERCOSUR. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11(3), 279–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenpeace. (2019). Greenpeace denuncia que el acuerdo comercial UE-Mercosur agravará la destrucción ambiental. https://es.greenpeace.org/es/sala-de-prensa/comunicados/greenpeace-denuncia-que-el-acuerdo-comercial-ue-mercosur-agravara-la-destruccion-ambiental/
   Google Scholar
• Grigera, J. (2015). Conspicuous silences: State and class in structuralist and neostructuralist thought. In J. R. Webber & S. Spronk (Eds.), Crisis and contradiction: Marxist perspectives on Latin America in the global political economy (pp. 193–210). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2017). The organic crisis of the British State: Putting Brexit in its place. Globalizations, 14(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1228783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenthaler, K., & Mora, F. O. (2002). Explaining Latin American economic integration: The case of Mercosur. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110101108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapavitsas, C., Kaltenbrunner, A., Labrinidis, G., Lindo, D., Meadway, J., Michell, J., Painceira, J. P., Pires, E., Powell, J., Stenfors, A., Teles, N., & Vatikiotis, L. (2012). Crisis in the Eurozone. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leiva, F. I. (2008). Toward a critique of Latin American neostructuralism. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00028.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. (2013, noviembre). El Mercosur: misión cumplida Revista SAAP. Publicación de Ciencia Política de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político, 7(2), 275–282. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/10209
   Google Scholar
• Mansor de Mattos, F., & Dias Carcanholo, M. (2012). Amenazas y oportunidades del comercio brasileño con China lecciones para Brasil. Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, 168(43), enero-marzo. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2012.168.28640
   Google Scholar
• Mecham, M. (2003). Mercosur: A failing development project? International Affairs, 79(2), 369–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, K. L. (2017). MERCOSUR. In S. Krapohl (Ed.), Regional integration in the global south: External influence on economic cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC (pp. 147–178). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, T. (2016). Beyond ‘BRICS’: Ten theses on south-south cooperation in the twenty-first century. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 630–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1108161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. (2015). A history of the FTAA: From hegemony to fragmentation in the Americas. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzola, A. A. (2017). Cooperación diacrónica para intereses diversos.intereses y lealtades provinciales en la formulación de políticas en argentina. Política y gobierno, XXIV(1 I semestre), 125–156. http://hdl.handle.net/11651/1511
   Google Scholar
• Pezzola, A. A. (2018). The deep roots of protectionism in the Southern Cone: Constituent interests and Mercosur’s common external tarif. Latin American Politics and Society, 60(4), 69–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2001). Regionalist governance in the new political economy of development: ‘Relaunching’ the Mercosur. Third World Quarterly, 22(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590120071786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2003). The rise and fall of open regionalism? Comparative reflections on regional governance in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000074565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prébisch, R. (1963). Las disparidades de la demanda y sus efectos sobre el desarrollo económico. En Prébisch Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano (pp. 81–106). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto Corredor, G., & Betancourt Vélez, R. (2014). Entre la soberanía, la autonomía y la innovación: un marco conceptual para el análisis de la Alianza del Pacifico. En E. Paltrana Buelvas & H. Gerhing (Eds.), Alianza del Pacifico: Mitos y Realidades (pp. 75–115). Editorial Universidad de Santiago de Cali.
   Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Region, regionness and regionalism in Latin America: Towards a new synthesis. New Political Economy, 17(4), 421–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.603827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. (2008). Latin American and global capitalism: A critical globalization perspective. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, P. (2012). China-brasil: industrialización y ‘desindustrialización temprana’. Cuadernos de economía, 31(56), 253–272. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/35841 (Accedido: 9 agosto 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Bajo, C. (1999). MERCOSUR’s open regionalism and regulation focusing on the petrochemical and steel sectors. Iberoamericana – Nordic Journal of Latin America and Caribbean Studies, 29(1–2), 67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.16993/ibero.364
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (2009). Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soria, A. B., & García, P. M. (Eds.). (2015). China en América Latina y el Caribe: Escenarios estratégicos subregionales. FLACSO-CAF.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings, B. (1995). Global change, regional response: The new international context of development. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkel, O. (1995). Del desarrollo hacia adentro al desarrollo desde dentro. En O. Sunkel (Ed.), El desarrollo desde dentro. Un enfoque neoestructuralista para la América Latina (Primera reimpresión, pp. 35–79). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Vigevani, T., & Ramazzini, H. (2009). Brasil en el centro de la integración. Revista Nueva Sociedad, 219, 76–96.
   Google Scholar
• Vivares, E. (ed.). (2018). Regionalism, development and the post-commodities boom in South America. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Vivares, E., & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2015). Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 866–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (1990). Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Institute for International Economics. November 2002.
   Google Scholar