What are they doing right? Tweeting right-wing intersectionality in Latin America

References

• Abbot, J., & Levitsky, S. (2020). The left turn and citizenship: How much has changed? In M. Balán, & F. Montambeault (Eds.), Legacies of the left turn in Latin America. The promise of inclusive citizenship (pp. 370–407). Notre Dame University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aguayo, G., & Rosas, C. (2019). Ideología de género. El nuevo intento por desnaturalizar el plan eterno de Dios. Editorial Peniel.
   Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., Cantijoch, M., & Gallego, A. (2009). Political participation and the internet: A field essay. Information, Communication & Society, 12(6), 860–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802282720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to #protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on twitter. Information Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biroli, F., & Caminotti, M. (2020). The conservative backlash against gender in Latin America. Politics & Gender, 16(1), E1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariboni, D. (2018). El género es el nuevo demonio. In Revista noticias, Dic. 22nd, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, T. (2020). Interpretative methods. In D. Berg-Schlosser, B. Badie, & L. Morlino (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political science (Vol. 1, pp. 406–422). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chiasson-LeBel, T. (2019). Neoliberalism in Ecuador after Correa. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 108(108), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10500
   Google Scholar
• Coll Planas, G., & Cruells, M. (2013). La puesta en práctica de la interseccionalidad política: el caso de las políticas LGTB en Cataluña. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 31, 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective. (2015). The combahee river collective statement. Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0028151/
   Google Scholar
• Cornejo-Valle, M., & Pichardo, J. I. (2017). La “ideología de género” frente a los derechos sexuales y reproductivos. El escenario español. Cadernos Pagu, 50, https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201700500009
   Google Scholar
• Corredor, E. (2019). Unpacking “gender ideology” and the global right’s antigender countermovement. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1086/701171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics (pp. 139–167). University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Dabène, O. (2020). Uses and mises of the “left” category in Latin America. In M. Balán, & F. Montambeault (Eds.), Legacies of the left turn in Latin America. The promise of inclusive citizenship (pp. 347–369). Notre Dame University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and anti-VAWA activism. Feminist Criminology, 3(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085108316731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, K. (2014). New strategies of the Latin American right. Beyond parties and elections. In J. P. Luna, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The resilience of the Latin American right (pp. 75–93). Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against women. Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Froio, C., & Ganesh, B. (2018). The transnationalisation of far-right discourse on twitter: Issues and actors that cross borders in Western European democracies. European Societies, 21(4), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1997). La interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Gioscia, L., & Wences, I. (2017). Sentir la política. Critica Contemporánea. Revista de Teoría Política, 7, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Goldentul, A., & Saferstein, E. (2020). Los jóvenes lectores de la derecha argentina. Un acercamiento etnográfico a los seguidores de Agustín Laje y Nicolás Márquez. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, 24(112), 113–131.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, L. (1988). Por um feminismo Afro-latino-americano. http://www.letras.ufmg.br/literafro/ensaistas/24-textos-das-autoras/1445-lelia-gonzalez-por-um-feminismo-afro-latino-americano
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2008). Selections from the prison notebooks. (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell, Trans., Eds.). International Publishers. (Original work published 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, L. (2017). Why we keep separating the ‘inseparable’: Dialecticizing intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815577114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. (2017). Making sense of the alt-right. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. (2018, March 15). Is the alt-right collapsing? Talk sponsored by Berkeley's Center for Right-Wing Studies, UC Berkeley. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McqA5wmI5fQ
   Google Scholar
• Henning, C. E. (2015). Interseccionalidade e pensamento feminista: as contribuições históricas e os debates contemporâneos acerca do entrelaçamento de marcadores sociais da diferença. Mediações, 20(2), 97–128.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias, N. (2018, June 21). ¡Dios nos libre! El movimiento con mis hijos no te metas. La diaria. https://ladiaria.com.uy/opinion/articulo/2018/6/dios-nos-libre/
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. (2019). Rtweet: Collecting and analyzing Twitter data. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(42), 1829. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01829
   Google Scholar
• Kotef, H. (2020). Violent attachments. Political Theory, 48(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591719861714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourliandsky, J. (2019). Democracia, evangelismo y reacción conservadora. Revista Nueva Sociedad, 280, 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2004). Hegemonía y estrategia socialista: Hacia una radicalización de la democracia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, M. (2008). Colonialidad y género. Tabula Rasa, 9(9), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.340
   Google Scholar
• Luna, J. P., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (eds.). (2014). The resilience of the Latin American right. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Márquez, N., & Laje, A. (2017). El libro negro de la nueva izquierda: Ideología de género o subversión cultural. Pesur Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(31), 1771–1802. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, D. (2019). Con mis hijos no te metas: un estudio de discurso y poder en un grupo de facebook peruano opuesto a la «ideología de género». Anthropologica, 37(42), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201901.006
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, L., Montoya, C., Emejulu, A., & Weldon, S. L. (2018). Intersectionality and the politics of knowledge production. European Journal of Politics & Gender, 1(1-2), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15272520831166
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (2017). Intersectionality and its discontents. American Quarterly, 69(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2017.0006
   Google Scholar
• North, L., & Clark, T. (2018). Dominant elites in Latin America: From neo-liberalism to the ‘pink tide’. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Bentancur, V., & Rocha-Carpiuc, C. (2020). The postreform stage: Understanding backlash against sexual policies in Latin America. Politics & Gender, 16(1), E3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A., & Pattynama, P. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platero, R. L. (2012). Intersecciones: cuerpos y sexualidades en la encrucijada. Edicions Bellaterra.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P. (2015). Our discipline and its politics. Authoritarian political science: Chile 1979–1989. Revista de Ciencia Política, 35(1), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2015000100008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P. (2019). The politics of political science. Re-writing Latin American experiences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P., & Dauphinee, E. (2018). Narrative and the possibilities for scholarship. International Political Sociology, 12(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olx029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P., & Upadhyay, N. (2013). Queering conceptual boundaries: Assembling indigenous. Marxist, Postcolonial and Queer Perspectives. Jindal Global Law Review, 4(2), 357–378.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, E. (2017, September 30). Intersectional-what? Feminism's problem with jargon is that any idiot can pick it up and have a go. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/intersectional-feminism-jargon
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, S. (2020). Antigender activism in Peru and its impact on state policy. Politics & Gender, 16(1), E5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scirica, E. (2014). Comunistas y anticomunistas: redes políticas y culturales en Argentina y Chile durante la guerra fría (circa 1960). Anuario del Instituto de Historia Argentina, 14, http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.6728/pr.6728.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Segado-Boj, F., Díaz-Campo, J., & Lloves-Sobrado, B. (2015). Líderes latinoamericanos en twitter. Viejas costumbres para nuevos medios en tiempos de crisis políticas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 156–173.
   Google Scholar
• Segato, R. (2018). A manifesto in four themes. Critical Times, 1(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-1.1.198
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010). Predicting elections with twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 4(1), 178–185. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14009
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2011). Election forecasts with twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310386557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaggione, J., & Campos Machado, M. (2020). Religious patterns of neoconservatism in Latin America. Politics & Gender, 16(1), E2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valobra, A. (2014). “Mujeres-sombra” y “Barbudas”: Género y política en el Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Mujeres, Chile – 1959. Anuario del Instituto de Historia Argentina, 14, 1–17. http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.6729/pr.6729.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Wormer, K. (2008). Anti-feminist backlash and violence against women worldwide. Social Work & Society, 6(2), 324–337.
   Google Scholar
• Viveros Vigoya, M. (2015). L’intersectionnalité au prisme du féminisme latino-américain. Raisons Politiques. Les langages de l’Intersectionnalité, 58(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.058.0039
   Google Scholar
• Viveros Vigoya, M. (2016). La interseccionalidad: una aproximación situada a la dominación. Debate Feminista, 52, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.df.2016.09.005
   Google Scholar
• The Washington Post. (2020, April 30). Twitter sees record number of users during pandemic, but advertising sales slow. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/twitter-sees-record-number-of-users-during-pandemic-but-advertising-sales-slow/2020/04/30/747ef0fe-8ad8-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html
   Google Scholar
• We Are Social and Hootsuite. (2020a). Digital 2020. Global digital overview. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020
   Google Scholar
• We Are Social and Hootsuite. (2020b). Digital 2020. July Global Statshot report. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/07/more-than-half-of-the-people-on-earth-now-use-social-media
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A. (2019). Cultural Marxism and the cathedral: Two alt-right perspectives on critical theory. In C. M. Battista, & M. R. Sande (Eds.), Critical theory and the humanities in the age of the alt-right (pp. 39–60). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar