Local resistance: at the margins of investment law

References

• Bear Creek v. Peru. (2017). Award, ICSID case no. ARB/14/21 (30 November) online: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9381.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bellak, C. (2015). Economic impact of investment agreements. Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business. Working Paper No. 200 (August). https://epub.wu.ac.at/4625/1/wp200.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bernasconi, N., Brauch, M. D., & Mann, H. (2020). Civil society and international investment arbitration: tracing the evolution of concern. In F. Ortino, & T. Schultz (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of International arbitration (pp. 304–327). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biwater Gauff. (2007). (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, Procedural Order No. 5, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, para. 50 (2 February 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Born, G., & Forrest, S. (2019). Amicus Curiae participation in investment arbitration. ICSID Review, 34(3), 626–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siz020
   Google Scholar
• Brada, J. C., Drabek, Z., & Iwasaki, I. (2021). Does investor protection increase foreign investment? A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(1), 34–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J., & Spivak, G. C. (2007). Who sings the nation state? Language, politics, belonging. Seagull Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carim, X. (2016). International investment agreements and Africa’s structural transformation: A perspective from South Africa. In K. Singh, & B. Ilge (Eds.), Rethinking bilateral investment treaties: Critical issues and policy choices (pp. 51–67). Both Ends
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the World. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L., & Perrone, N. M. (2021). Investors’ International law and its asymmetries: The case of local communities. In J. Ho, & M. Sattorova (Eds.), Investor’s International Law (pp. 71–88). Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L., & Schröder, M. (2017). Community Perspectives in Investor-State arbitration. International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Danzman, S. B. (2019). The Political economy of bilateral investment treaties. In M. Krajewski, & R. T. Hoffman (Eds.), Research Handbook on foreign direct investment (pp. 11–38). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia. (2019). Procedural Order No. 6 (decision on non-disputing parties’ application) ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41 (18 February). https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10360.pdf (last accessed 31 July 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia. (2020). Procedural Order No. 11 (on the filing of post-hearing briefs) ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41 (28 January). https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw11119.pdf (Last accessed 10 October 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia. (2021). Decision on jurisdiction, liability and directions on quantum, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41 (9 September) Eco + Oro + v.+Colombia + Decision + on + Jurisdiction%2C + Liability + and + Directions + on + Quantum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, V., & Sebastián, X. (2019). Ecuador and international investment law and policy: Between constitutional sovereignty and state responsibility. Doctoral Dissertation, Masstricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Fernades de Andrade, G., & Justino de Oliveira, G. H. (2013). Investment treaties, foreign investment and Brazilian law: The magic of reality. In D. de Andrade Levy, A. G. de Borja, & A. N. Pucci (Eds.), Investment protection in Brazil (pp. 71–106). Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, K., Pohl, J., & Bouchard, M. (2014). Investment treaty law, sustainable development and responsible business conduct: A fact-finding survey. OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2014/1.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S. (2007). Learning to curse: Essays in modern culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grisel, F. (2020). Marginals and elites in international arbitration. In T. Schultz, & F. Ortino (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international arbitration (pp. 260–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Quenguan, J. C. (2020). Explaining Ecuador’s Shifting Position on FDI, Investment Treaties, and Arbitration. Investment Treaty News (5 October) at https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2020/10/05/explaining-ecuadors-shifting-position-on-fdi-investment-treaties-and-arbitration-juan-carlos-herrera-quenguan/ (last accessed 4 September 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. (2020). The sociological dimension. In T. Schultz, & F. Ortino (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international arbitration (pp. 717–739). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Human Rights Program (IHRP). (2014). University of Toronto Faculty of Law and Centre for International Environmental Law, Guide for Potential Amici in International Investment Arbitration 15 (January 2014). http://ciel.org/Publications/Guide_PotentialAmici_Jan2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T. (2010). Third party participation in investment treaty arbitration. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(2), 373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey, J., & Mohamadieh, K. (2021). UNCITRAL’s work plan on ISDS reform: The role of the commission in stopping marginalisation of issues of concern to developing countries. Third World Network Briefing Paper (August) at https://twn.my/title2/briefing_papers/twn/WGIII%20WP%20TWNBP%20Aug%202021%20Kelsey%20&%20Mohamadieh.pdf (last accessed 4 September 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey, J., Schneiderman, D., & Van Harten, G. (2019). Phase 2 of the UNCITRAL ISDS Review: Why “Other Matters’ Really Matter”. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/all_papers/328 (last accessed 12 October 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. (2011). Promotion of contentious agency as a rewarding movement strategy: Evidence from the MST-Paper industry in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 435–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. (2014). Contentious agency and natural resource politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. (2020). Iron will: Global extractivism and mining resistance in Brazil and India. UMichigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2012). The making of the indebeted man: An essay on the neoliberal condition. semiotexte.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-C. (2017). Safeguarding the environment? The effectiveness of Amicus Curiae submissions in investor-state arbitration. International Community Law Review, 19(2-3), 270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyderson, K., & Cardona-Maguidad, A. (2015). Gold fever, green dreams: The many faces of gold mining in Colombia (Part 2). NACLA (11 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2005). Sovereignty as a form of expenditure. In T. B. Hansen, & F. Stepputat (Eds.), Sovereign bodies: Citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world (pp. 148–166). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States. (1997). Claimant’s Memorial, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (13 October).
   Google Scholar
• Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States. (1998). Claimant’s Reply, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (21 August).
   Google Scholar
• Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States. (2001). Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (3 August).
   Google Scholar
• Methanex. (2007). Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to Intervene as “amici curiae” (15 January 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Morino, R. (2020). The cynical state: Forging extractivism, neoliberalism and development in government spaces. Third World Quarterly, 41(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivet, C. (2017). Why did Ecuador terminate all its bilateral investment treaties?. Transnational Institute (25 May) at https://www.tni.org/en/article/why-did-ecuador-terminate-all-its-bilateral-investment-treaties (last accessed 4 September 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2016). The international investment regime and local populations: Are the weakest voices unheard? Transnational Legal Theory, 7(3), 383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2016.1242249
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2019). The “invisible” local communities: Foreign investor obligations, inclusiveness, and the international investment regime. EJIL Online.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2021). Investment treaties and the legal imagination: How foreign investors play by their own rules. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, J. (2018). Societal benefits and costs of international investment agreements: A critical review of aspects and available empirical evidence. In OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2018/1. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The Political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puig, S. (2014). Social Capital in the Arbitration market. European Journal of International Law, 25(2), 387–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubins, N. (2007). Opening the investment arbitration process: At what cost, for what benefit? In R. Hofmann, & C. Tams (Eds.), The International convention on the settlement of investment disputes (ICSID): taking stock after 40 years (pp. 213).
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, L., Johnson, L., Guven, B., Coleman, J., & Mehranvar, L. (2021). The UNCITRAL Working Group III Work Plan: Locking in a broken system?’ Columbia Centre on Sustainable Development Blog at https://ccsi.columbia.edu/news/uncitral-working-group-iii-work-plan-locking-broken-system (accessed 26 August 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Santa Elena SA, Compañía del Desarrollo de v Costa Rica. (2000). Final Award, ICSID Case No ARB/96/1 (17 February).
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sattorova, M. (2018). The impact of investment treaty law on host states: Enabling good governance? Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. (2004). Crude chronicles: Indigenous politics, multinational oil, and neoliberalism in Ecuador. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schadendorf, S. (2009). Investor-state arbitrations and the human rights of the host state’s population: An Empirical approach to the impact of Amicus Curiae submissions. In N. Weiß, & J.-M. Thouvenin (Eds.), The influence of human rights on international law (pp. 167–181). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2008). Constitutionalizing economic globalization: Investment rules and democracy’s promise. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2013). Resisting economic globalization: Critical theory and investment law. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2014). How to govern differently: Neo-liberalism, new constitutionalism, and international investment law. In C. Cutler, & S. Gill (Eds.), New constitutionalism and World order (pp. 165–178). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2018). Disabling constitutional capacity: Global economic law and democratic decline. In M. A. Graber, S. Levinson, & M. Tushnet (Eds.), Constitutional democracy in crisis? (pp. 551–570). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2022). Investment law’s Alibis: colonialism, imperialism, debt and development. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sornarajah, M. (2010). The international law on foreign investment. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sornarajah, M. (2015). Resistance and change in the international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neoextractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, T. (2020). North American investment law and policy: Developments in 2019. Roosevelt Institute Working Paper (March) at https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RI_NorthAmericanInvestmentLawandPolicy_Working-Paper_202003.pdf (last accessed 12 October 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Unceta, K. (2014). Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, maldesarrollo y postdesarrollo. In K. Unceta (Ed.), Desarrollo, postcrecimiento y buen vivir: Debates e interrogantes (pp. 31–100). Ediciones Abya-Yala.
   Google Scholar
• VanDuzer, J. A. (2007). Enhancing the procedural legitimacy of investor-state arbitration through transparency and Amicus Curiae participation. McGill Law Journal, 52(4), 681–723.
   Google Scholar
• UNCITRAL Secretariat. (2021a). ‘Workplan to Implement Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Reform and Resource Requirements’ A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.206 (4-5 May).
   Google Scholar
• UNCITRAL Secretariat. (2021b). ‘Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of its Resumed Fortieth Session (Vienna, 4 and 5 May 2021)’ A/CN.9/1054 (27 May).
   Google Scholar
• Van Harten, G. (2020). The trouble with foreign investor protection. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wälde, T. (2007). The specific nature of investment arbitration. In P. Kahn, & T. W. Wälde (Eds.), New aspects of international investment law (pp. 4–120). Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1990). The role of law in progressive politics. In D. Kairys (Ed.), The politics of law: A progressive critique, revised edition (pp. 468–477). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. M. (2002). ‘NAFTA, Mexico & Metalclad: Understanding the normative framework of international trade law’ (LL.M. Thesis, Faculty of Law, UBC) (unpublished).
   Google Scholar