Talking about talking: Interpersonal process recall as an intersubjective approach to research

References

• Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2007). Discourse analysis and psychotherapy: A critical review. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 9, 157–176.10.1080/13642530701363445
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). M. Holquist (Ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., & Cahill, J. (2006). A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE System. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6, 3–15.10.1080/14733140600581218
   Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Connell, J., Twigg, E., Leach, C., Lucock, M., … Angus, L. (2008). Effects of psychological therapies in randomized trials and practice-based studies. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 397–415.10.1348/014466508X311713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1990). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In S. A. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 193–200). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.10.1002/(ISSN)2167-4086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (2010). Change in psychotherapy: A unifying paradigm. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, R. (2004). Subjectivity, objectivity, and triangular space. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 47–61.10.1002/(ISSN)2167-4086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinnin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Danchev, D., & Ross, A. (2014). Research ethics for counsellors, nurses and social workers. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473915169
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, I. R. (2004). Guide to imagework: Imagination-based research methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (1986). Interpersonal process recall (IPR) as a psychotherapy process research method. In L. Greenberg & W. Pinsof (Eds.), The Psychotherapeutic Process (pp. 503–527). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., & Shapiro, D. A. (1988). Brief structured recall: A more efficient method for studying significant therapy events. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61, 141–153.10.1111/papt.1988.61.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using ourselves in research. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Evidence-Based Medical Working Group. (1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 2420–2425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., & Freshwater, D. (2014). Methodology and mental illness: Resistance and restorying. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21, 197–205. doi:10.1111/jpm.12073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (1991). Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 639–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Freshwater, D. (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 134–146.10.1177/1558689806298578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freshwater, D., & Rolfe, G. (2001). Critical reflexivity: A politically and ethically engaged research method for nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing, 6, 526–537.10.1177/136140960100600109
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd revised ed.). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. (2012). Feminist approaches to triangulation: Uncovering subjugated knowledge and fostering social change in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 137–146.10.1177/1558689812437184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsfall, D., & Titchen, A. (2009). Disrupting edges – Opening spaces: Pursuing democracy and human flourishing through creative methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 147–160.10.1080/13645570902752324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, M. L., & White, J. (2013). Relational inquiries and the research interview: Mentoring future researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1960). On the nature of the psyche. In H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (pp. 159–234). Vol. 8: The structure and dynamics of the psyche. New York, NY: Bollingen Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, H. (Klein), & Kagan, N. I. (1997). Interpersonal process recall: Influencing human interaction. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 296–309). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, N., Schauble, P., Resnikoff, A., Danish, S. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1969). Interpersonal process recall. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 148, 365–374.10.1097/00005053-196904000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelsch, L. E. (2013). Reconceptualising the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, D., Flesaker, K., & Stege, R. (2008). Qualitative interviewing using interpersonal process recall: Investigating internal experiences during professional-client conversations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7, 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, J. (2005). Two research discourses. Therapy Today, 16, 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, J., & Freshwater, D. (2008). Practitioner-based research: Power, discourse and transformation. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenthal, D. (2006). Questioning psychotherapeutic ‘evidence’. In D. Loewenthal & D. Winter (Eds.), What is psychotherapeutic research? (pp. 47–52). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenthal, D. (2014). Relational ethics: From existentialism to post-existentialism. In D. Loewenthal & A. Samuels (Eds.), Relational psychotherapy, psychoanalysis and counselling: Appraisals and reappraisals (pp. 140–151). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macaskie, J. F. (2014). Transcending polarities: Counsellors’ and psychotherapists’ experiences of transformation ( PhD thesis). University of Leeds. White Rose etheses online. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7239/
   Google Scholar
• Macaskie, J., Meekums, B., & Nolan, G. (2013). Transformational education for psychotherapy and counselling: A relational dynamic approach. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 41, 351–362.10.1080/03069885.2012.726348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2010). Case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, D., & Cooper, M. (2005). Working at relational depth in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., & Aron, L. (Eds.). (1990). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muncey, T. (2010). Creating autoethnographies. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268339
   Google Scholar
• Pelias, R. (2011). Leaning: A poetics of personal relations. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peñaranda Correa, F. (2013). The evaluation of qualitative research: A reflection from a justice perspective. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 209–218.10.1177/1077800412466225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. (1994). Clients’ deference in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 427–437.10.1037/0022-0167.41.4.427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. (2001). The client as a self-aware agent in counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 1, 82–89.10.1080/14733140112331385118
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.10.1037/h0045357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossetto, K. R. (2014). Qualitative research interviews: Assessing the therapeutic value and challenges. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 482–489.10.1177/0265407514522892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2012). Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• West, W., & Clark, V. (2004). Learnings from a qualitative study into counselling supervision: Listening to supervisor and supervisee. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4, 20–26.10.1080/14733140412331383903
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar