International Obligations and the Right to Food: Clarifying the Potentials and Limitations in Applying a Human Rights Approach When Facing Biofuels Expansion

References

• ALSTON, Philip. (2008) Putting economic, social and cultural rights back on the agenda of the United States. In The Future of Human Rights: U.S. Policy for a New Era, W.F. Schulz (ed.) (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
   Google Scholar
• ALSTON, Philip. (1984) International law and the human right to food. In The Right to Food, P. Alston and K. Tomasevski (eds.) (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• ALSTON, Philip, and QUINN, Gerald. (1987) The nature and scope of state parties’ obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 9, 156–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE. (1987) Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Philadelphia: American Law Institute).
   Google Scholar
• BAUE, Bill. (2006) Win or Lose in Court. [Online]. Available: www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/06winlose.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• BETTON, John. (2008) The global context of human rights violations: The impact of the Alien Tort Claims Act. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 3, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• CASSEL, Doug. (2008) Corporate aiding and abetting of human rights violations: Confusion in the courts. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, 6, 304–326.
   Google Scholar
• CHAPMAN, Audrey. (2007) The status of efforts to monitor economic, social and cultural rights. In Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement and Policy Issues, S. Hertel and L. Minkler (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CLAPHAM, Andrew. (2006) Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• COMMISSION ON LEGAL EMPOWERMENT OF THE POOR. (2008) Making the Law Work for Everyone, Volume 1 (New York: Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor and United Nations Development Programme).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (1990) General Comment 2, International Technical Assistance Measures (Art. 22), UN Doc. E/1990/23, pp. 86–88 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (1991) General Comment No. 3, The Nature of States Parties Obligations, E/1991/23, 83–87 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (1998) General Comment No. 8, The Relationship Between Economic Sanctions and Respect for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN doc. E/1998/22 (1998) 119–122 . (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (1999) Statement to the Third Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (Seattle, 30 November to 3 December 1999), E/C.12/1999/9 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (2000a) General Comment No. 12, The Right to Adequate Food (art. 11), E/2000/22, 102–110 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (2000b) General Comment No. 14, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (art. 12), E/C.12/2000/4 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (2002) General Comment No. 15, The Right to Water (arts. 11 and 12), E/C.12/2002/11 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS (CESCR). (2007) An Evaluation of the Obligation to take Steps to the “Maximum of Available Resources” Under an Optional Protocol to the Covenant, E/C.12/2007/1 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (CRC). (2003) General Comment No. 5 (CRC/GC/2003/5): General measures of Implementation for the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE. (2007) Ethanol and Other Biofuels: Potential for U.S.-Brazil Energy Cooperation (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service).
   Google Scholar
• CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE. (2009) Brazil-U.S. Relations (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service).
   Google Scholar
• CONSULATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (CGIAR). (2008) A session on global challenges: New initiatives to harness the power of agricultural science. CGIAR News December 2008. [Online]. Available: www.cgiar.org/enews/december2008/story_02_print.html [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• COOMANS, Fons. (2004) Some remarks on the extraterritorial application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, F. Coomans and M. Kamminga (eds.) (Antwerpen: Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• CRAVEN, Matthew (1995). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – A Perspective on its Development (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• CRAVEN, Matthew. (2004) Human rights in the realm of order: Sanctions and extraterritoriality. In Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, F. Coomans and M. Kamminga (eds.) (Antwerpen: Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• DE BECO, Gauthier. (2009) Human rights impact assessment. Netherlands Human Rights Quarterly 27, 139–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DE SCHUTTER, Olivier (ed.). (2006) Transnational Corporations and Human Rights (Portland: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• DEININGER, Klaus, and BYERLEE, Derek. (2010) Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (Washington DC: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• DEVA, Surya. (2012) Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business (London & New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• DOWELL-JONES, Mary (2004) Contextualising the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Assessing the Economic Deficit (Leiden: Brill).
   Google Scholar
• ECONOMIST (2011a) Special report: The 9 billion-people question (26 February).
   Google Scholar
• ECONOMIST (2011b) When others are grabbing your land (7 May).
   Google Scholar
• EIDE, Asbjørn. (2007) State obligations revisited. In Food and Human Rights in Development: Evolving Issues and Emerging Applications, W. Barth Eide and U. Kracht (eds.) (Antwerpen: Intersentia, Volume 11) 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION (FAO). (2002a) Declaration of the World Food Summit: five years later. [Online]. Available: www.fao.org/DOCREP/MEETING/005/Y7106E/Y7106E09.htm [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION (FAO). (2002b) Declaration of the World Food Summit: five years later. Annex II: Explanatory notes/reservation. [Online]. Available: www.fao.org/DOCREP/MEETING/005/Y7106E/y7106e03.htm#P192_62571 [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION (FAO). (2004) Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security, Adopted by the 127th Session of the FAO Council (Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization).
   Google Scholar
• FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION (FAO). (2007) Right to food and indigenous peoples. [Online]. Available: http://www.fao.org/righttofood/wfd/pdf2007/focus_indigenous_eng.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION (FAO). (2012) Voluntary Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land and other Natural Resources. Adopted by the Committee on World Food Security 11 May (Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization).
   Google Scholar
• GÓMEZ ISA, Felipe. (2009). Transnational obligations on the field of economic, social and cultural rights. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 18, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• HARRISON, James. (2010) Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade Agreements: Reflections on Practice and Principles for Future Assessment. Annex 2 of the report of the Expert Seminar on Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade and Investment Agreements, June 23–24, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• HAUGEN, HansMorten. (2007) The Right to Food and the TRIPS Agreement – With a Particular Emphasis on Developing Countries’ Measures for Food Production and Distribution (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• HAUGEN, HansMorten. (2009) Food sovereignty – An appropriate approach to ensure the right to food? Nordic Journal of International Law, 78, 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• HAUGEN, HansMorten. (2010) Human rights impact assessment in the context of biofuels: Addressing the human right to food and the human right to water. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 28, 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• HODGSON, Douglas (2003) Individual Duties within a Human Rights Discourse (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• HOSPES, Otto. (2009) Regulating biofuels in the name of sustainability or the right to food. In Fed up with the Right to Food: The Netherlands’ Policies and Practices Regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food, O. Hospes and B. van der Meulen (eds.) (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. (2004) General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND TRADE POLICY (IATP). (2008) Farm Bill a Missed Opportunity (Minneapolis: IATP).
   Google Scholar
• INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND TRADE POLICY (IATP). (2005) U.S. Food Aid: Time to Get it Right (Minneapolis: IATP).
   Google Scholar
• INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. (1970) Legal consequences for states of the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), ICJ Reports 1971 (The Hague: International Court of Justice).
   Google Scholar
• INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. (2002) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Monetary Fund. [Online]. Available: www.imf.org/external/np/leg/sem/2002/cdmfl/eng/gianv3.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• JONES, Wayne, and ELSARI, Armelle. (2010) Rising food prices: Causes, consequences and policy responses. In Food Crises and the WTO, B. Karapinar and C. Häberli (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• KENT, George. (2008) Global obligations. In Global Obligations for the Right to Food, George Kent (ed.) (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• KENT, George. (2011) Ending Hunger Worldwide (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• KUCHLER, Magdalena. (2010) Unraveling the argument for bioenergy production in developing countries: A world-economy perspectiveEcological Economics, 69, 1336–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAMY, Pascal. (2009) Globalization and trade opening can promote human rights. [Online]. Available: www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl128_e.htm [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• LANGFORD, Malcolm, VANDENHOLE, Wouter, SCHEININ, Martin, and VAN GENUGTEN, Willem. (eds.). (2012) Global Justice, State Duties: The Extra-Territorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• MARCUS, David. (2003) Famine crimes in international law. American Journal of International Law, 97, 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCBETH, Adam. (2010) International Economic Actors and Human Rights (Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• MECHLEM, Kerstin. (2006) Harmonizing trade in agriculture and human rights: Options for the integration of the right to food into the agreement on agriculture. In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 10, A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum (eds.) (Leiden: Brill).
   Google Scholar
• MOL, ArthurP. J. (2007) Boundless biofuels: Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability. Sociological Ruralis, 47, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOWBRAY, Jaqueline. (2007) The right to food and the international economic system: An assessment of the rights-based approach to the problem of world hunger. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20, 545–569.
   Google Scholar
• NARULA, Smita. (2006) The right to food: Holding global actors accountable under international law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 44, 691–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'BOYLE, Michael. (2004) The European Convention on Human Rights and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: A Comment on “Life After Bankovic.” In Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, F. Coomans and M. Kamminga (eds.) (Antwerpen: Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). (2011) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Update 2011, C(2011)59 (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD Watch. (2011, May 25) Press release: OECD Updates Ethical Business Standards But Fails to Ensure Enforcement (Paris: OECD Watch).
   Google Scholar
• OSHAUG, Arne. (2005) Developing voluntary guidelines for implementing the right to adequate food: Anatomy of an intergovernmental process. In Food and Human Rights in Development: Legal and Institutional Dimensions and Selected Topics, W. Barth Eide and U. Kracht (eds.) (Antwerpen: Intersentia, Volume 11).
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTSON, Robert. (1994) Measuring state compliance with the obligation to devote the “maximum available resources” to realizing economic, social and cultural rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 16, 693–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAUER, Sérgio. (2006) The World Bank's market-based land reform in Brazil. In Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform, P. Rosset, R. Patel, and M. Courville (eds.) (New York: Institute for Food and Development Policy and CDS).
   Google Scholar
• SCHMIDHUBER, Josef, and MATUSCHKE, Ira. (2010) Shift and wing factors and the special role of weather and climate; Impact on food prices. In Food Crises and the WTO, B. Karapinar and C. Häberli (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SEPÚLVEDA CARMONA, Magdalena. (2007) Obligations of “international assistance and cooperation” in an optional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 24, 271–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKINNER, Gwynne. (2008) Nuremberg's legacy continues: The Nuremberg Trials’ influence on human rights litigation in U.S. Courts under the Alien Tort StatuteAlbany Law Review, 71, 321–367.
   Google Scholar
• SKOGLY, Sigrun. (2003) The obligation of international assistance and co-operation in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden. Essays in honour of Asbjørn Eide, Morten Bergsmo (ed.) (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff).
   Google Scholar
• SKOGLY, Sigrun. (2006) Beyond National Borders: States’ Human Rights Obligations in International Cooperation (Antwerpen: Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• SKOGLY, Sigrun. (2007) Right to food: National implementation and extraterritorial obligations. In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Armin von Bogdandy and Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, Volume 11).
   Google Scholar
• SKOGLY, Sigrun, and GIBNEY, Mark. (2002) Transnational human rights obligations. Human Rights Quarterly, 24, 781–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKOGLY, Sigrun, and GIBNEY, Mark (eds.). (2010) Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
   Google Scholar
• SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. (2007) Human rights impact assessments – resolving key methodological questions, A/HRC/4/74 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. (2008a) Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights, A/HRC/8/5 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. (2008b) Clarifying the Concepts of “Sphere of influence” and “Complicity”, A/HRC/8/16 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. (2009) Business and human rights: Towards operationalizing the ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework, A/HRC/11/13 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, A/HRC/17/31 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (1993) Vienna Declaration and Plan of Action A/CONF.157/23, adopted by the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights 25 June 1993 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2000a) Millennium Declaration, A/RES/55/2 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2000b) Globalization and its Impact on the Full Enjoyment of all Human Rights, A/55/342 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2004) The Right to Food, E/CN.4/RES/2004/19 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2005a) 2005 World Summit Outcome, A/RES/60/1 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2005b) Compilation of the essential aspects of the replies received on the pre-draft declaration on human social responsibilities – Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, E/CN.4/2005/99 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2005c) Human Rights and Human Responsibilities, E/CN.4/DEC/2005/111 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2005d) Report of the Working Group on an optional protocol to the ICESCR on its second session, E/CN.4/2005/52 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2006) Report of the Working Group on an optional protocol to the ICESCR on its third session, E/CN.4/2006/47 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2007) Report of the Working Group on an optional protocol to the ICESCR on its fourth session, A/HRC/6/8 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2008) Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, A/RES/63/117, Annex (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2010a) The Right to Food, A/RES/64/159 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS (UN). (2010b) The Right to Food, A/HRC/RES/13/4 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT GROUP (UNDG). (2003) The Human Rights Based Approach to Development Cooperation: Towards a Common Understanding among UN Agencies. [Online]. Available: http://www.undg.org/archive_docs/6959-The_Human_Rights_Based_Approach_to_Development_Cooperation_Towards_a_Common_Understanding_among_UN.pdfDevelopment_Cooperation_Towards_a_Common_Understanding_among_UN.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. (2006) Press Release on the Occasion of Human Rights Day: States and International Community Have a Duty to Fight Poverty, High Commissioner for Human Rights says. [Online]. Available: www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/076DEB0923674510C125723E0026F302?opendocument [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMAN RESPONSIBILITIES. (2003) Final report of the Special Rapporteur, E/CN.4/2003/105 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD. (2008) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, A/HRC/9/23 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD. (2009a) The Role of Development Cooperation and Food Aid In realizing the Right to Adequate Food: Moving from Charity to Obligation, A/HRC/10/5 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD. (2009b) Mission to the World Trade Organization, A/HRC/10/5/Add.2 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD. (2010) Report Submitted by the Special Rapporteur on The right to Food, Olivier De Schutter, A/HRC/16/49 (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD. (2011) Guiding Principles on Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade and Investment Agreements A/HRC/19/59/Add.5, Appendix (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• VANDENHOLE, Wouter. (2007) Third States Obligations under the ICESCR: A Case Study of EU Sugar Policy. Nordic Journal of International Law, 76, 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• VON BRAUN, Joachim et al. (2008) International Agricultural Research for Food Security, Poverty Reduction, and the Environment. [Online]. Available: www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/oc58.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• WEILERT, Katarina. (2010). Transnational corporations in United Nations law and practice. Max Planck Yearbook on United Nations Law, 14, 445–506.
   Google Scholar
• WELLING, Judith. (2008) International indicators and economic, social and cultural rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 933–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILSON, AndrewJ. (2006) Beyond Unocal: Conceptual problems in using international norms to hold transnational corporations liable under the Alien Tort Claims Act. In Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, Olivier de Schutter (ed.) (Portland: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• WORLD BANK. (2007) World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development (Washington DC: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• WORLD BANK SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL. (2006) Legal Opinion on Human Rights and the Work of the World Bank. [Online]. Available: www.ifiwatchnet.org/sites/ifiwatchnet.org/files/DaninoLegalOpinion0106.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• WORLD BANK, FAO, IFAD, and UNCTAD. (2010) Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment that Respects Rights, Livelihoods and Resources. Extended Version. [Online]. Available: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/214574–1111138388661/22453321/Principles_Extended.pdf [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO). (1998) US – Shrimps, Appellate Body Report, WT/DS58/AB/R (Geneva: World Trade Organization).
   Google Scholar
• WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO). (2005a) EU – Sugar, Appellate Body Report, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R (Geneva: World Trade Organization).
   Google Scholar
• WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO). (2005b) Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(05)/DEC. (Geneva: World Trade Organization).
   Google Scholar
• WRIGHT, Alan. (2008) Brazil–U.S. Biofuels Cooperation: One Year Later (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Brazil Institute).
   Google Scholar
• ZIEGLER, Jean. (2006) There is nothing inevitable about world hunger. l’Humanité [Online]. Available: www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article462 [7 August 2012].
   Google Scholar