References
- AJIBOLA, Bola A. (1996) Compliance with judgements of the international court of justice. In Compliance with Judgments of International Courts, Mielle K. Bulterman (ed.) (Leiden, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).
- ALTER, Karen. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- ALTER, Karen. (2008, November) Jurist Advocacy Movements in Europe and the Andes: How Lawyers Help Promote International Legal Integration. [Online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=12700 [3 September 2013].
- BERNARDES, Marcia N. (2011) Inter-American Human Rights System as transnational public sphere: Legal and Political aspects of the implementation of international decisions. SUR, 8(15), 131–151.
- CARNOTA, Walter. (2012) The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and “Conventionality Control.” [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2116599 [19 June 2013].
- CASTILLA-JUÁREZ, Karlos. (2013) ¿Control interno o difuso de convencionalidad? Una mejor idea: la garantía de los tratados. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, XIII, 51–97.
- CHAYES, Abraham, and CHAYES, Antonia H. (1993) On compliance. International Organization, 47(2), 175–205.
- COLLI-EK, Victor M. (2012) Improving human rights in Mexico: Constitutional reforms, international standards and new requirements for judges. Human Rights Brief, 20(1), 7–14.
- CONSTITUCIÓN POLÍTICA DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS (CPEUM). (1917) Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. [Online]. Available: http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/1.pdf [26 December 2013].
- CONTESSE, Jorge. (2012) The Last Word?: Control of Conventionality and the Possibility of Conversations with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (New Haven, CT: Yale Law School, Latin American Legal Studies). [Online]. Available: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/sela/SELA13_Contesse_CV_Eng_20130514.pdf [20 March 2013].
- COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (1978) Judgment of the Court of 9 March 1978. Case 106/77. [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&numdoc=61977J0106 [26 February 2013].
- EPP, Charles. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activist, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
- FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL (CJF). (2012a) Dirección General de Estadística Judicial, Sentencia 177/2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.dgepj.cjf.gob.mx/ [20 May 2013].
- FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL (CJF). (2012b) Dirección General de Estadística Judicial, Sentencia 44/2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.dgepj.cjf.gob.mx/ [20 May 2013].
- FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL (CJF). (2012c) Dirección General de Estadística Judicial, Sentencia 615/2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.dgepj.cjf.gob.mx/ [20 May 2013].
- FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL (CJF). (2012d) Dirección General de Estadística Judicial. [Online]. Available: http://www.dgepj.cjf.gob.mx/ [20 May 2013].
- FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL (CJF). (2012e) Dirección General de Estadística Judicial, Sentencia 736/2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.dgepj.cjf.gob.mx/ [20 May 2013].
- FERRER-MCGREGOR, Eduardo. (2013) Interpretación conforme y control difuso de convencionalidad: El nuevo paradigma para el juez mexicano. In Estudos Avançados de Direitos Humanos. Democracia e Integração Jurídica, Armin von Bogdandy, Flavia Piovesan, and Mariela Morales-Antoniazzi (eds.) (São Paulo: Campus Elsevier).
- FUENTES-TORRIJO, Ximena. (2007) International Law and Domestic Law: Definitely an Odd Couple (New Haven, CT: Yale Law School, Latin American Legal Studies). [Online]. Available: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/sela/XimenaFuentes__English_.pdf [20 March 2013].
- GARCÍA-RAMÍREZ, Sergio. (2011) El control judicial interno de convencionalidad. Revista IUS, V(28), 123–159.
- HERRERÍAS-CUEVAS, Ignacio, and ROSARIO-RODRIGUEZ, Marcos. (2012) El control de constitucionalidad y convencionalidad. Sentencias que han marcado un nuevo paradigma (Mexico City: Ubijus).
- HILBINK, Lisa. (2007) Politicizing law to liberalize politics: Anti-francoist judges and prosecutors in Spain's democratic transition. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, Terence Charles Halliday, Lucien Karpik, and Malcolm Feeley (eds.) (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing).
- HILLEBRECHT, Courtney. (2012) The domestic mechanisms of compliance with international human rights: Case studies from the Inter-American Human Rights System Law. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(4), 959–985.
- HUNEEUS, Alexandra V. (2010) Rejecting the Inter-American Court: Judicialization, national courts, and regional human rights. In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, J. Couso, A. Huneeus, and R. Sieder (eds.) (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press).
- INGRAM, Matthew. (2012) Crafting courts in new democracies: Ideology and judicial council reform in three Mexican states. Comparative Politics, 44(4), 439–458.
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (1994) Advisory Opinion OC14/94. [Online]. Available: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/b_11_4n.htm [5 April 2013].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2003) Case of Myrna Mack Chang v. Guatemala. Judgement of November 25, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_101_ing.pdf [20 April 2013].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2006a) Case of Almonacid Arellano et al. v. Chile. Judgement of September 26, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_154_ing.pdf [20 April 2013 ].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2006b) Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.) v. Peru. Judgment of November 24, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_158_ing.pdf [23 April 2013 ].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2008) Case of Castañeda Gutman v. Mexico. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 6, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_184_ing.pdf [23 April 2013].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2009a) González et al. (“Campo Algodonero”) v. Mexico. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 16, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf [20 April 2013].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2009b) Case of Radilla-Pacheco v. Mexico. Judgment of November 23, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_209_ing.pdf [20 April 2013].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2010a) Case Cabrera Garcia and Montiel Flores v. Mexico. Judgement of September, 2010. [Online]. Available: www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_220_ing.doc [23 April 2013 ].
- INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (IACHR). (2010b) Case Fernández Ortega et al. v. Mexico. Judgment of August 30, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_215_ing.pdf [20 April, 2013].
- KAPISZEWSKI, Diana, and TAYLOR, Matthew. (2013) Compliance: Conceptualizing, mesuaring and explaining adherence to judicial rulings. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(4), 803–835.
- KINGSBURY, Benedict. (1998) The concept of compliance as a function of competing conceptions of international law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19(2), 345–372.
- MCCANN, Michael. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- NUNES, Rodrigo. (2010) Ideational origins of progressive judicial activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health. Latin American Politics and Society, 52(3), 67–97.
- ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). (1969) American Convention on Human Rights. [Online]. Available: http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm [21 April , 2013].
- ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). (2013) American Convention on Human Rights. [Online]. Available: http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights_sign.htm [1 April , 2013].
- PAULSON, Colter. (2004) Compliance with final judgments of the International Court of Justice since 1987. The American Journal of International Law, 98(3), 434–461.
- SAGÜÉS, Nestor P. (2010) Obligaciones internacionales y control de convencionalidad. Estudios Constitucionales, 8(1), 117–136.
- SCHULTE, Constanze. (2004) Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- SCOTT, Robert, and STEPHAN, Paul B. (2006) The Limits of Leviathan: Contract Theory and the Enforcement of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- SIMMONS, Beth. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- SPRIGGS, James. (1997) Explaining federal bureaucratic compliance with Supreme Court opinions. Political Research Quarterly, 50(3), 567–593.
- SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION (SCJN). (2011a) Thesis P LXV/2011. Sentencias emitidas por la corte interamericana de derechos humanos. Son vinculantes en sus términos cuando el estado mexicano fue parte en el litigio. Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta. Libro III. Tomo 1. Mexico City. [Online]. Available: http://sjf.scjn.gob.mx/sjfsist/Paginas/DetalleGeneralV2.aspx?id=160482&Clase=DetalleTesisBL [26 June 2013].
- SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION (SCJN). (2011b) Thesis P. LXVII/2011. Control de convencionalidad ex officio en un modelo de control difuso de constitucionalidad. Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta. Libro III. Tomo 1. Mexico City. [Online]. Available: http://sjf.scjn.gob.mx/sjfsist/Paginas/DetalleGeneralV2.aspx?id=160589&Clase=DetalleTesisBL [26 June 2013].
- SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION (SCJN). (2011c) File Varios 912/2010. Mexico City. [Online]. Available: http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/AsuntosRelevantes/pagina/SeguimientoAsuntosRelevantesPub.aspx?ID=121589&SeguimientoID=225 [26 June 2013].
- SUPREME COURT OF JUSTINCE OF THE NATION (SCJN). (2011d) Thesis P. LXVIII/2011. Parámetro para el control de convencionalidad ex officio en materia de derechos humanos. Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta. Libro III. Tomo 1. Mexico City. [Online]. Available: http://sjf.scjn.gob.mx/sjfsist/Paginas/DetalleGeneralV2.aspx?id=160526&Clase=DetalleTesisBL [26 June 2013].
- SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION (SCJN). (2013) Contradiction of Thesis 293/2011. SCJN determina que las normas sobre derechos humanos contenidas en Tratados Internacionales tienen rango constitucional. Mexico City. [Online]. Available: http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/asuntosrelevantes/pagina/seguimientoasuntosrelevantespub.aspx?id=129659&seguimientoid=556 [5 January 2014].
- TALLBERG, Jonas. (2002) Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.
- TROCHEV, Alexei. (2008) Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- UNITED NATIONS (UN). (1948) The Universal Declaration on Human Rights. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ [8 May 2013].
- UNITED NATIONS (UN). (1966) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx [8 May 2013].
- UNITED NATIONS (UN). (1969, May) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Geneva: United Nations). [Online]. Available: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201155/volume-1155-I-18232-English.pdf. [10 May 2013].
- UNITED NATIONS (UN). (1990) Convention on the Rights of the Child. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx [10 May 2013].