Gender, intersectionality, and religious manifestation before the European Court of Human Rights

References

• BERG-SCHLOSSER, Dirk, DE MEUR, Gisèle, RIHOUX, Benoît, and RAGIN, Charles C. (2009) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In Configurational Comparative Methods, Benoît Rihoux and Charles Ragin (eds.) (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Carbin, Maria and Sara Edenheim (2013) The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?. European Journal of Women's Studies, 20(3), 233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHOO, Hae Yeon, and Ferree, Myra Marx. (2010) Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLOSA, Carlos. (2013) National higher courts and the ratification of EU treaties. West European Politics, 36(1), 97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLLINS, Todd, and MOYER, Laura. (2008) Gender, race, and intersectionality on the federal appellate bench. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRENSHAW, Kimberle. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–168.
   Google Scholar
• CRISTOFAR, Ilana S. (2001) Blood, Water and the Impure Woman: Can Jewish Women Reconcile Between Ancient Law and Modern Feminism?. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 10(2), 451–482.
   Google Scholar
• CRONQVIST, Lasse, and BERG-SCHLOSSER, Dirk. (2009) Multi-value QCA (mvQCA). In Configurational Comparative Methods, Benoît Rihoux and Charles Ragin (eds.) (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• D’ALESSIO, Stewart, and STOLZENBERG, Lisa. (1993) Socioeconomic status and the sentencing of the traditional offender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(1), 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DALY, Kathleen, and BORDT, Rebecca L. (1995) Sex effects and sentencing: A review of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 143–177.
   Google Scholar
• DUSA, Adrian. (2007) User manual for the QCA(GUI) package in R. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 576–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FERRARI, Silvio. (2012) The Strasbourg Court and Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights: A quantitative analysis of the case law. In The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public School Classroom, Jeroen Temperman (ed.) (Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• KAHN BEST, Rachel, HAMILTON KRIEGER, Linda, and EDELMAN, Lauren B. (2011) Multiple disadvantages: An empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Law and Society Review, 45(4), 991–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LETSAS, George. (2006) Two concepts of the margin of appreciation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(4), 705–732.
   Google Scholar
• LIZOTTE, Alan J. (1978) Extra-legal factors in Chicago’s criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice. Social Problems, 25(5), 564–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LORDE, Audrey. (1984) Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press).
   Google Scholar
• MCCALL, Leslie. (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASH, Jennifer C. (2008) Rethinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RADACIC, Ivana. (2008) Gender equality jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 841–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAGIN, Charles, and FISS, Peer. (2016) Intersectional Inequality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• RIHOUX, Benoît, and DE MEUR, Gisèle. (2009) Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In Configurational Comparative Methods, Benoît Rihoux and Charles Ragin (eds.) (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and SAUER, Birgit. (eds.) (2012) Politics, Religion and Gender: Framing and Regulating Veil (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• RUBIO-MARÍN, Ruth, and MÖSCHEL, Mathias. (2015) Anti-discrimination exceptionalism: Racist violence before the ECtHR and the Holocaust prism. European Journal of International Law, 26(4), 881–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDER, Carsten, and WAGEMANN, Claudius. (2012) Set Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide To Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SCHIEK, Dagmar, and LAWSON, Anna. (eds.) (2011) European Union non-discrimination law and intersectionality: Investigating the triangle of racial, gender and disability discrimination (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• SHIELDS, Stephanie A. (2008) Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, Alec. (2002) Judicialization and the construction of governance. In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet (eds.) (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• VAKULENKO, Anastasia (2007) ‘Islamic headscarves’ and the European Convention On Human Rights: An intersectional perspective. Social and Legal Studies, 16(2), 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YOSHIDA, Keina. (2013) Towards intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The case of B.S. v. Spain. Feminist Legal Studies, 21(2), 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZEMPI, Irene. (2016) ‘It is a part of me, I feel naked without it’: Choice, agency, and identity for Muslim women who wear the niqab. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(10), 1738–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar