References
- Aaronson, S. A., & Higham, I. (2013). Re-righting business: John Ruggie and the struggle to develop international human rights standards for transnational firms. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(2), 333–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0032
- Aguilar, P. (2008). Transitional or post-transitional justice? Recent developments in the Spanish case. South European Society and Politics, 13(4), 417–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740902735000
- Almirón, Bocos, Cardozo, Levín, S/Privación Ilegal De La Libertad Agravada y Tormentos Agravados en Perjuicio de Víctor Manuel Cobos. (2016). Cámara Federal de Casación Penal, Causa n° 4076/14. https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-10034-Procesaron-a-tres-acusados-por-cr-menes-de-lesa-humanidad-cometidos-en-Salta.html
- Altschuller, A. (2009). Two ways to think about the punishment of corporations. American Criminal Law Review, 46(1), 1359–1392.
- Argentinian Criminal Code. (1984). Sections 45 to 49, 210, 277 ff. http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/15000-19999/16546/texact.htm
- Basualdo, V. (2006). Complicidad Patronal-militar en la Última Dictadura Argentina: Los Casos de Acindar, Astarsa, Dálmine Siderca, Ford, Ledesma y Mercedes Benz. Revista Engranajes de la Federación de Trabajadores de la Industria y Afines, 5(1), 1–21.
- Basualdo, V., Ojea Quintana, T., & Varsky, C. (2016). The cases of Ford and Mercedes Benz. In Horacio Verbitsky and Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky(Eds.), The economic accomplices to the argentine dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Batesmith, A. (2014). Corporate criminal responsibility for war crimes and other violations of international humanitarian law: The impact of the business and human rights movement. In Caroline Harvey, James Summers & Nigel D. White (Eds.), Contemporary challenges to the laws of war: Essays in honour of Professor Peter Rowe. Cambridge University Press.
- Bernaz, N. (2015). Corporate criminal liability under international law: The new TV S.A.L. and Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. Cases at the special tribunal for Lebanon. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13(2), 313–330.
- Bismuth, R. (2009). Mapping a responsibility of corporations for violations of international humanitarian law sailing between international and domestic legal orders. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 38(2), 203–226.
- Blaquier y Otros s/privación Ilegal de Libertad. (2012). Cámara Federal de Casación Penal, Causa FSA 44000195. https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-38520-Resoluci-n-de-la-Corte-Suprema-de-Justicia-de-la-Naci-n-en-causa-FSA-44000296-2009-18-1-1-RH5--Blaquier--Carlos-Pedro-Tadeo-y-otro-s--inf.-art.-144-bis-en-circ.-art.-142-inc.-1--2--3--5-.html
- Bohoslavsky, J. P. (2016), Corporate responsibility for Complicity: International and Local Perspectives. In Horacio Verbitsky and Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the Argentine dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Bohoslavsky, J. P., & Opgenhaffen, V. (2010). The past and present of corporate complicity: Financing the Argentinean dictatorship. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 23(166), 159–203.
- Bonnitcha, J., & Mccorquodale, R. (2017). The concept of ‘due diligence’ in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. The European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 899–919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx042
- Cassel, D. (2018). The third session of the UN intergovernmental working group on a business and human rights treaty. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(2), 277–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.10
- CELS. (2015). Responsabilidad Empresarial en Delitos de Lesa Humanidad: Represión a los Trabajadores Durante el Terrorismo de Estado - Tomo I y II. https://www.cels.org.ar/web/2015/12/nuevo-informe-responsabilidad-empresarial-en-crimenes-de-lesa-humanidad-en-la-argentina/
- CELS (2017), Derechos Humanos en la Argentina. Informe 2017. Available at https://www.cels.org.ar/web/publicaciones/derechos-humanos-en-la-argentina-informe-2017/
- Chambers, R. (2005). The unocal settlement: Implications for the developing law on corporate complicity in human rights abuses. Human Rights Brief, 13(1), 14–16.
- Clapham, A. (2019). Human rights obligations for non-state-actors: Where are we now?. In Fannie Lafontaine & François Larocque (Eds.), Doing peace the rights way: Essays in international law and relations in honour of Louise Arbour. Intersentia.
- Clapham, A., & Jerbi, S. (2001). Categories of corporate complicity in human rights abuses. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 24(3), 339–349.
- Clough, J., & Mulhern, C. (2002). The prosecution of corporations. Oxford University Press.
- Comisión Nacional Sobre La Desaparición De Personas (CONADEP). (1984). Final Report: Conclusions. http://www.desaparecidos.org/nuncamas/web/investig/articulo/nuncamas/nmas0001.htm
- Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina, Blaquier, Carlos Pedro Tadeo y otros s/inf. art 144 bis en circ. art. 142 inc 1,2,3,5. Available at https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-38520-Resoluci-n-de-la-Corte-Suprema-de-Justicia-de-la-Naci-n-en-causa-FSA-44000296-2009-18-1-1-RH5--Blaquier--Carlos-Pedro-Tadeo-y-otro-s--inf.-art.-144-bis-en-circ.-art.-142-inc.-1--2--3--5-.html
- Daimler Ag V. Bauman. (2014). 965 U.S. (Iv.B, 23). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf
- Dandan, A., & Franzki, H. (2016). Between historical analysis and legal responsibility: The Ledesma case. In Horacio Verbitsky & Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the Argentine dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Deva, Surya & Bilchitz, David. (Eds.). (2013). Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge University Press.
- DOE V. UNOCAL. (2002). 395 U.S. (F.3D 932). https://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/DomCLIC/Docs/NLP/US/Unocal_Burma_Decision_on_Motion_for_Judgment_14-09-2004.pdf
- Domingo, P. (2012). Dealing with legacies of violence: Transitional justice and governance transitions, Background note, Overseas Development Institute.
- Estate of Rodriguez V. Drummond Company, Inc. (2003). 256 U.S (F. 1250, 1257). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/256/1250/2390376/
- Etchecolatz, Homicidio Calificado. (2006). Tribunal Oral Criminal Federal La Plata, Causa n° 2251/06.
- Guembe, M. J. (2006). Economic reparations for grave human rights violations: The Argentinian experience. In Pablo De Greiff (Ed.), The handbook of reparations. Oxford University Press.
- Hamilton, R. (2018). Jesner v. Arab Bank. American Journal of International Law, 112(4), 720–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.73
- Honorable Congreso de la Nación Argentina. (2017). Ley de Responsabilidad Penal Empresaria (Ley 27401), November 8.
- Huisman, W., & Sliedregt, E. V. (2010). Rogue traders: Dutch businessmen, international crimes and corporate complicity. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(3), 803–817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq040
- International Commission of Jurists. (2008). Report of the International Commission of Jurists expert panel on corporate complicity and international crimes. In Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability (Vol. I and II). Geneva, Switzerland
- Juzgado Federal de Salta n°1, (2016) Almiron, Bocos, Cardozo, Levın, S/Privacion Ilegal De La Libertad Agravada y Tormentos Agravados en Perjuicio de Vıctor Manuel Cobos. Available at https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-10034-Procesaron-a-tres-acusados-por-cr-menes-de-lesa-humanidad-cometidos-en-Salta.html
- Kaleck, W. (2013). International Criminal Law and Transnational Business: Cases from Argentina and Colombia. In Sabine Michalowski (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge.
- Karasik, G., & Gómez, E. (2015). La Empresa Ledesma y la Represión en la Década de 1970: Conocimiento, Verdad Jurídica y Poder en los Juicios de Lesa Humanidad. Clepsidra: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Sobre Memoria, 2(1), 110–131.
- Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum. (2013). 133 Supreme Court 1659. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/10-1491_l6gn.pdf
- Kremnitzer, M. (2010). A possible case for imposing criminal liability on corporations in international criminal law. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(3), 909–918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq036
- Leebaw, B. (2008). The irreconcilable goals of transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly, 30(1), 95–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2008.0014
- Márquez Carrasco, C. (2018). Access to remedy for the victims of corporate-related human rights abuse. Assessing the contribution of the fundamental rights agency. In Angelica Bonfanti (Ed.), Business and human rights in Europe. International law challenges. Routledge.
- Methven O’brien, C. (2020). Confronting the constraints of the medium: The fifth session of the UN intergovernmental working group on a business and human rights treaty. Business and Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 150–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2019.30
- Michalowski, S. (2013). Due diligence and complicity: A relationship in need of clarification. In Surya Deva & David Bilchitz (Eds.), Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge University Press.
- Nestle USA, Inc. V. doe I and Cargill, Inc. (2020). 9th circuit US (Docket 19-416). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/10-1491_l6gn.pdf
- Paul, G., & Schönsteiner, J. (2013). Transitional Justice and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. In Sabine Michalowski (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge.
- Payne, L. A., & Pereira, G. (2016a). Accountability for corporate complicity in human rights violations: Argentina’s transitional justice innovation? In Horacio Verbitsky & Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the Argentine dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Payne, L. A., & Pereira, G. (2016b). Corporate complicity in international human rights violations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12(1), 63–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085100
- Payne, L. A., Pereira, G., Doz Costa, J., & Bernal-Bermúdez, L. (2017). Can a treaty on business and human rights help achieve transitional justice goals? Homa Publica: Revista Internacional De Direitos Humanos e Empresas, 1(1), 96–126.
- Perosino, María Celeste, Nápoli, Bruno & Bosisio, Walter Alberto. (Eds.). (2013). Economía, Política y Sistema Financiero: La Última Dictadura Cívico-militar en la Comisión Nacional de Valores., Comisión Nacional de Valores.
- Pietropaoli, I. (2020). Business, human rights and transitional justice. Routledge.
- Presbyterian Church of Sudan V. Talisman Energy Inc. (2009). 582 U.S. (5F.3). https://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/DomCLIC/Docs/NLP/US/Talisman_Court_of_Appeal_Judgement_3-10-2009.pdf
- Ramasastry, A. (2002). Corporate complicity: from Nuremberg to Rangoon – An examination of forced labor cases and their impact on the liability of multinational corporations. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 20(1), 91–159.
- Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the gap between Responsibility and Accountability Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 237–259.
- Rodriguez-Garavito, César. (Ed.). (2017). Business and human rights: Beyond the end of the beginning. Cambridge University Press.
- Roht-Arriaza, N. (2016). Why was the economic dimension missing for so long in transitional justice? An exploratory essay. In Horacio Verbitsky & Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the argentine dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Romero V. Drummond Company, Inc. (2007). 430 U.S. (F.3D 1234- 1243). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/07-14090/200714090-2011-02-28.html
- Ruggie, J. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework’: Report of the SRSG on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises (21 March 2011) A/HRC/17/31, endorsed in Res. 17/4 adopted by the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/RES/17/4 (2011). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
- Ruggie, J., & Sherman, J. (2017). The concept of ‘due diligence’ in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: Reply to Professors Bonnitcha and Mccorquodale. European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 921–933. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx047
- Sandoval, C., Filipini, L., & Vidal, . (2013). Linking transitional justice and corporate accountability. In Sabine Michalowski (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge.
- Skaar, E. (2011). Explaining post-transitional justice. In Elin Skaar (Ed.), Judicial independence and human rights in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Supreme Court of Chile. (2017). Caso Paine, episodio Collipeumo v. Juan Francisco Luzoro (1.568-2017). http://interactivos.museodelamemoria.cl/justicia/archivo/1568_2017.pdf
- Szoke-Burke, S. (2015). Not only ‘context’: Why transitional justice programs can no longer ignore violations of economic and social rights. Texas International Law Journal, 50(3), 465–494.
- Teitel, R. (2002). Transitional justice in a new era. Fordham International Law Journal, 26(4), 893–906.
- United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights (UNWG). (2020). Report on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises ‘Business, human rights and conflict-affected regions: towards heightened action (UN Doc. A/75/212). United Nations.
- UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR] 2019, Legally Binding instrument to regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises (The Zero Draft). Available at https://www.ohchr.org/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/wgtranscorp/session3/draftlbi.pdf
- United States V. Carl Krauch et al. (1948). http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1948.07.30_United_States_v_Krauch.htm
- United States V. Alfried Krupp et al. (1947). https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/united-states-military-tribunal-nuremberg-united-states-v-alfried-krupp-et-al
- United States V. Friedrich Flick et al. (1948). https://www.archives.gov/files/research/captured-german-records/microfilm/m891.pdf
- Velásques Rodríguez V. Honduras. (1998). IACtHR (serie C, 4-174). https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_04_esp.pdf
- Verbitsky, H., & Bohoslavsky, J. P. (2016). Introduction. In Horacio Verbitsky & Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the argentine dictatorship: outstanding debts. Cambridge University Press.
- Wettstein, F. (2012). Silence as complicity: Elements of a corporate duty to speak out against the violation of human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 37–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122214