The gendered politics of recognition and recognizability through political apology

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, E. & Karn, A. (2006). Group apology as an ethical imperative. In E. Bakran & A. Karn (Eds.), Taking wrongs seriously: Apologies and reconciliation (pp. 3–32). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, T. (2021). When is a justice campaign over?: Transitional justice, ‘overing’ and Bloody Sunday. Cooperation and Conflict, 001083672198936. [online first] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836721989365
   Google Scholar
• Brittain, M. (2006). Benevolent invaders, heroic victims and depraved villains: white femininity in media coverage of the invasion of Iraq. In K. Hunt & K. Rygiel (Eds.), (En)gendering the war on terror: War stories and camouflaged politics (pp. 73–96). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. L. (1999). The Age of Apology. In R. L. Brooks (Ed.), When sorry isn’t enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice (pp. 3–12). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. (2013). Patriarchal confusion? Making sense of gay and lesbian military identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D.E. (2009). Rethinking “Rape as a weapon of war”. Feminist Legal Studies, 17(2), 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, L. (2001). Laura Bush on Taliban oppression of women. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/laurabushtext_111701.html
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997a). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997b). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celermajer, D. (2008). Apology and the possibility of ethical politics. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 9(1), 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Celermajer, D. (2009). The sins of the nation and the ritual of apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinkin, C. (1994). Rape and sexual abuse of women in international law. European Journal of International Law, 5(3), 326–341.
   Google Scholar
• Copelon, R. (2000). Gender crimes as war crimes: Integrating crimes against women into international criminal law. McGill Law Journal, 46, 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daase, C., Engert, S., Horelt, M. -A., Renner, J., & Strassner, R. (Eds.). (2015). Apology and reconciliation in international relations: The importance of being sorry. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doezema, J. (2002). Who gets to choose? Coercion, consent, and the UN trafficking protocol. Gender & Development, 10(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070215897
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. (2020). Sexual violence, political apology and competing victimhoods. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2019.1577152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. (2021). Gender and political apology: When the patriarchal state says “sorry”. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, G. R. & Jones A. R. (2004). Executive summary: Investigation of intelligence activities at Abu Ghraib (pp. 1–143).
   Google Scholar
• Feitz, L. & Nagel, J. (2008). The militarization of gender and sexuality in the Iraq War. In H. Carreiras & G. Kummel (Eds.), Women in the military and in armed conflict (pp. 201–225). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The discourse on language. In R. Trans. Swyer, H. Adams & L. Searle (Eds.), Critical Theory Since 1965 (pp. 148–162). Tallahassee: Florida State.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gersen, J. S. (2021). Seeking the true story of the comfort women: How a Harvard professor’s dubious scholarship reignited a history of mistrust between South Korea and Japan. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/seeking-the-true-story-of-the-comfort-women-j-mark-ramseyer
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, M., Howard-Hassmann, R. E., Coicaud, J.–M., & Steiner, N. (Eds.). (2008). The age of apology: Facing up to the past. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. & Verwoerd, W. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of apology. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00124
   Google Scholar
• Gries, P. H. & Peng, K. (2002). Culture clash? Apologies East and West. Journal of Contemporary China, 11(30), 173–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/106705601200912000
   Google Scholar
• Gunstone, A. (2016). Reconciliation, reparations and rights. In C. Lennox & D. Short (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous peoples’ rights (pp. 301–312). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesford, W. (2011). Spectacular rhetorics: Human rights visions, recognitions, feminisms. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, S. (2004). ‘The gray zone: How a secret pentagon programme came to Abu Ghraib’, The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/05/24/the-gray-zone (accessed 20 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2004). The road to Abu Ghraib. https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/06/08/road-abu-ghraib.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, M., & Valverde, E. (2008). Human rights politics and injustice: Transitional justice in Argentina and South Africa. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. & Rygiel, K. (Eds.). (2006). (En)Gendering the war on terror: War stories and camouflaged politics. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, H.-J. S. (2015). Comfort women in human rights discourse: Fetishized testimonies, small museums, and the politics of thin description. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 37(2–3), 166–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2015.1028836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, H. (2020). “I think the comfort women are us”: National identity and affective historical empathy in students’ understanding of “comfort women” in South Korea. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Kampf, Z. (2009). Public (non-) apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2257–2270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E.H. & Choi, C. (Eds.) (1998). Dangerous women: Gender and Korean nationalism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim-Gibson, D.S. (1999). Silence broken: Korean comfort women. Mid-Prairie Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lazare, A. (2005). On apology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, A. (2013). Gender and public apology. Transitional Justice Review, 1(2), 1–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5206/tjr.2013.1.2.6
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, A. (2015). Trust me, I'm sorry: The paradox of public apology. The Monist, 98(4), 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, A. (2019). #MeToo vs. Mea Culpa: On the risks of public apologies. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 19(1), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, A. (2014). Beyond the ideal political apology. In M. Mihai & M. Thaler (Eds.), On the Uses and Abuses of Political Apologies (pp. 13–31). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Markell, P. (2009). Bound by recognition. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, C. (2009). Feminina Sacra: The “war on/of terror”, women and the feminine. Security Dialogue, 40(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0967010608100846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2008). The trouble with recognition: Subjectivity, suffering, and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 271–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1467-9558.2008.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai, M. (2013). When the state says “sorry”: State apologies as exemplary political judgements. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai, M. & Thaler, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Mihai & M. Thaler (Eds.), On the uses and abuses of political apologies (pp. 1–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MoFA). (2015). Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion. http://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html
   Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, M. (2016). Ambiguity, existence, cosmopolitanism. In P. Hayden & K. Schick (Eds.), Recognition and global politics: Critical encounters between state and world (pp. 45–68). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, P. & Schaap, A. (2011). Confounded by recognition: The apology, the high court and the aboriginal embassy in Australia. In A. Hirsch (Ed.), Theorizing post-conflict reconciliation: Agonism, restitution and repair (pp. 184–201). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mun, O. (1995). Back to my wretched life. In K. Howard (Ed.), True stories of the Korean comfort women (pp. 104–115). Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2004). Bush “sorry” for prisoner abuse. CBS News: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bush-sorry-for-prisoner-abuse/.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. (2011). Apology, recognition, and reconciliation. Human Rights Review, 12(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/2Fs12142-010-0166-7
   Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. (2008). The politics of official apologies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norma, C. (2016). The Japanese comfort women and sexual slavery during the China and Pacific Wars. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Nusair, I. (2006). Gendered, racialized, and sexualized torture at Abu Ghraib. In K. Hunt & K. Rygiel (Eds.), (En)gendering the war on terror: War stories and camouflaged politics (pp. 179–193). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.-M. (2000). Comforting the nation: “Comfort women”, the politics of apology and the workings of gender. Interventions, 2(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/136980100427315
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2018). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseyer, J. M. (2021). Recovering the truth about the comfort women. Japan Forward. https://japan-forward.com/recovering-the-truth-about-the-comfort-women/
   Google Scholar
• Richter-Montpetit, M. (2007). Empire, desire and violence: A queer transnational feminist reading of the prisoner “abuse” in Abu Ghraib and the question of “gender equality”. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740601066366
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. (2009). Toward a theory of simulated atonement: A case study of President George W. Bush’s response to the Abu Ghraib Torture Scandal. Communication Studies, 60(5), 460–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903260319
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L. (2013). Gender, violence and security: Discourse as practice. Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. (2007). Agency, militarized femininity and enemy others: Observations from the war in Iraq. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740601066408
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. & Gentry, C.E. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2005). The categorical apology. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00289.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2014). Justice through apologies: Remorse, reform, and punishment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. F. (2016). Recognition in the struggle against global injustice. In P. Hayden & K. Schick (Eds.), Recognition and global politics: Critical encounters between state and world (pp. 175–194). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, C. S. (2001). Japan's responsibility toward comfort women survivors. Japan Policy Research Institute Working Paper No 77. http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html (accessed 31 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Soh, C. S. (2008). The comfort women: Sexual violence and postcolonial memory in Korea and Japan. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, S. (2004, May 23). Regarding the torture of others. The New York Times Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak? In R. Morris (Ed.), Can the Subaltern speak?: Reflections on the history of an idea (pp. 237–292). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taguba, A. M. (2012). AR 15-6 investigation of the 800th military police brigade.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. (2003). Japan’s comfort women. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (2018). Are women’s lives (fully) grievable? Gendered framing and sexual violence. In L. Dolezal Fischer (Eds.), New feminist perspectives on embodiment (pp. 147–165). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Teitel, R. (2006). The transitional apology. In E. Barkan & A. Karn (Eds.), Taking wrongs seriously: Apologies and reconciliation (pp. 101–114). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thobani, S. (2007). White wars: Western feminisms and the “war on terror”. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1464700107078140.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (2009). Intergenerational Justice: Rights and Responsibilities in an Intergenerational Polity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto, S. (2017). Beyond the dichotomy of prostitutes versus sex slaves: Transitional feminist activism of “comfort women” in South Korea and Japan. In P. Peniston-Bird & E. Vickers (Eds.), Gender and the second world war: The lessons of war (pp. 185–199). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Varga, A. (2009). National bodies: The “comfort women” discourse and its controversies in South Korea. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 9(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2009.01054.x
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post (2004, May 7). Rumsfeld testifies before Senate Armed Services Committee. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8575-2004May7.html
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. (2016). Queer international relations: Sovereignty, sexuality and the will to knowledge. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, L. B. (2015). Bodies of violence: Theorizing embodied subjects in international relations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisotzki, S. (2016). Justice as conflict of recognition: the case of SGBV in the Rome Statute and in the ICC. PRIF Working Papers. 34. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49677-7
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, J.W. (2004). Crafting the apology: Japanese Apologies to South Korea in 1990. Asian Journal of Communication, 14(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000256776
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. (1995). I will no longer harbour resentment. In K. Howard (Ed.), True stories of the Korean Comfort Women (pp. 50–58). Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, M. (2009). Hierarchies of grief and the possibility of war: Remembering UK fatalities in Iraq. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38(2), 419–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0305829809347540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivi, K. (2008). Rights and the politics of performativity. In T. Carver & S. A. Chambers (Eds.), Judith Butler’s precarious politics: Critical encounters (pp. 157–170). Routledge
   Google Scholar