Ranking for human rights? The formative power of indicators for business responsibility

References

• Bernstein, S. (2014). The publicness of non-state global environmental and social governance. In J. Best & A. Gheciu (Eds.), The return of the public in global governance (pp. 120–148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107281837.009
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., & Bäckstrand, K. (2022). (De)legitimation and the Composition of Audiences: Comparing Intergovernmental and Nongovernmental Global Governance Institutions. In M. Bexell, K. Jönsson & A. Uhlin (Eds.), Legitimation and delegitimation in global governance: Practices, justifications, and audiences (pp. 215–236). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856111.003.0010
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., Jönsson, K., & Stappert, N. (2021). Whose legitimacy beliefs count? Targeted audiences in global governance legitimation processes. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(2), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00199-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., Jönsson, K., & Uhlin, A. (Eds.). (2022). Legitimation and delegitimation in global governance: Practices, justifications, and audiences. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, D. (2021). Corporate power over human rights: An analytical framework. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2020.23
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Quirk, J. (2015). Governing the world at a distance: The practice of global benchmarking. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corporate Human Rights Benchmark [CHRB] 2019 Adidas Scoresheet. (2019). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2019 company scoresheet. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/chrb-scorecards-from-2017-2019
   Google Scholar
• CHRB 2019 Petrobras Scoresheet. (2019). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2019 company scoresheet. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/chrb-scorecards-from-2017-2019
   Google Scholar
• CHRB Response to Brumadinho Dam Disaster – Vale Suspension from Human Rights Benchmark (2019). Statement 28 January 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/04/CHRBJan2019responseVale.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2015). Framework paper for multi-stakeholder consultations. Corporate Human Rights Benchmark June 2015. Retrieved December 11, 2021, from https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/files/CHRB_Framework_Paper_Multi-stakeholder_consultations_Online_Consultation_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2017). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. 2017 Key findings. Retrieved December 11, 2021, from https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/corporate-rights-human-benchmark-2017-2019/
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2019). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. 2019 key findings. Retrieved December 11, 2021, from https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/CHRB2019KeyFindingsReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2020). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. 2020 Key findings. World Benchmarking Alliance. Retrieved December 3, 2021, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2020/11/WBA-2020-CHRB-Key-Findings-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB (2021a). Ensuring corporate respect for human rights: A benchmarking approach. September 2021. World Benchmarking Alliance. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/09/Ensuring-corporate-respect-for-human-rights-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2021b). CHRB 2020–2021 methodology review. Second public consultation. May-June 2021. CHRB/World Benchmarking Alliance. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/now-open-the-second-consultation-phase-of-the-corporate-human-right-benchmarks-methodology-review
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2021c). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Methodology. Apparel sector. September 2021. CHRB/World Benchmarking Alliance. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/12/CHRB-Methodology_291121_Apparel_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CHRB. (2021d). Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Methodology. Extractives sector. September 2021. CHRB/World Benchmarking Alliance. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/12/CHRB-Methodology_291121_Extractives_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (2012). Introduction: Global governance by indicators. In K. E. Davis, A. Fisher, B. Kingsbury, & S. E. Merry (Eds.), Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings (pp. 3–28). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658244.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Deva, S. (2020). From business or human rights to business and human rights: What next? In S. Deva & D. Birchall (Eds.), Research handbook on human rights and business (pp. 1–21). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781786436405
   Google Scholar
• Felice, D. (2015). Business and human rights indicators to measure the corporate responsibility to respect: Challenges and opportunities. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(2), 511–555. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hurq37&i=521
   Google Scholar
• Götzmann, N. (2017). Human rights impact assessment of business activities: Key criteria for establishing a meaningful practice. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.24
   Google Scholar
• Götzmann, N. (2019). Introduction to the handbook on human rights impact assessment: Principles, methods and approaches. In N. Götzmann (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 2–30). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970006
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Sekalala, S. (2015). Addressing the compliance gap? UN initiatives to benchmark the human rights performance of states and corporations. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051500039X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Chen, C.-H., Chen, C.-N., Huang, M., & Huang, S.-L. (2018). Contextualization of UN human rights indicators: Modifying “right to work” indicators for application in Taiwan. Journal of Human Rights, 17(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2018.1432341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Multi-Stakeholder Initiative Integrity. (2015, September 30). Submission on the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark regarding the Draft List of Indicators for Public Consultation. https://www.msi-integrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/MSI-Integrity-Submission-for-CHRB-Indicators-Consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2019). Introduction: The power of global performance indicators. International Organization, 73(03), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, J. (2020). Performing compliance with development indicators: Brokerage and transnational governance in aid partnerships. Social Anthropology, 28(4), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.1292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, R. (2020). De-contextualized corporate human rights benchmarks: Whose perspective counts? See disclaimer. Business and Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2019.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mende, J. (2021). The contestation and construction of global governance authorities. A study from the global business and human rights regime. Global Constitutionalism, 10(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000113
   Google Scholar
• Mende, J. (2022). Business authority in global governance. Companies beyond public and private roles. Journal of International Political Theory, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882221116924
   Google Scholar
• Mende, J., & Hoff, A. (2022). The governance authority of non-state actors in the business and human rights regime. Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2104119
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification: Measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2018). Measuring the world. Indicators, human rights, and global governance. In D. V. Malito, G. Umbach, & N. Bhuta (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of indicators in global governance (pp. 477–501). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6_21
   Google Scholar
• Muchlinski, P. (2021). The impact of the UN Guiding Principles on Business Attitudes to Observing Human Rights. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2021.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGO coalition to the Executive Director of the World Benchmarking Alliance. (2020, 8 July). Re: Rio Tinto's ranking on the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/580025f66b8f5b2dabbe4291/t/5f057969ccc9725cce4d7804/ 1594194287758/Letter+to+CHRB+.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2017, July 26). Human rights briefing: New corporate benchmark ‘a work in progress.’ Reuters. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://www.reutersevents.com/sustainability/human-rights-briefing-new-corporate-benchmark-work-progress
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2020, July 9). Aboriginal groups call for Rio to lose human rights status after caves blast. Reuters. Retrieved November 30, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-mining-indigenous-idUSKBN24A08H
   Google Scholar
• Rio Tinto. (2020, July 16). Comment on corporate human rights benchmark and world benchmarking alliance statement on Juukan Gorge. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/files/documents/16_July_Rio_Tinto_CHRB_response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosga, A., & Satterthwaite, M. (2012). Measuring human rights: UN indicators in critical perspective. In K. E. Davis, A. Fisher, B. Kingsbury, & S. E. Merry (Eds.), Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings (pp. 297–316). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658244.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, R., & Weiss, D. (2012). Semiotics of indicators: The case of corporate human rights responsibility. In K. E. Davis, A. Fisher, B. Kingsbury, & S. E. Merry (Eds.), Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings (pp. 110–131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658244.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Veiberg, C. B., Factor, G., & Tedaldi, J. R. (2019). Measuring business impacts on human rights: Practice and trends in the use of indicators for HRIA. In N. Götzmann (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 336–353). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970006.00031
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2015). Normativity, ethics, and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: A critical assessment. Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1005733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Benchmarking Alliance. (2021). Annual Plan 2021. Deepening relations, growing influence, fostering resilience. Retrieved November 30, 2021, from https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/03/Annual-Plan-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819974.001.0001
   Google Scholar