The governance authority of non-state actors in the business and human rights regime

References

• Barnett, M., & Sikkink, K. (2008). From international relations to global society. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), Oxford handbooks of political science. The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 62–83). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernaz, N., & Pietropaoli, I. (2017). The role of non-governmental organizations in the business and human rights treaty negotiations. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hux011
   Google Scholar
• Best, J., & Gheciu, A. (2014). Theorizing the public as practices: Transformations of the public in historical context. In J. Best & A. Gheciu (Eds.), The return of the public in global governance (pp. 15–44). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, M. (2022). Ranking for human rights? The formative power of indicators for business responsibility. Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2104118
   Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S. (2014). Legislatures, lobbying, and interest groups. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. W. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 526–542). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0019
   Google Scholar
• Brès, L., & Gond, J.-P. (2014). The visible hand of consultants in the construction of the markets for virtue: Translating issues, negotiating boundaries and enacting responsive regulations. Human Relations, 67(11), 1347–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713519278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, A. (2006). Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. (2015). Confronting the crisis of global governance: Report of the Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. The Hague Institute for Global Justice and the Stimson Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (Eds.) (1999). Private authority and international affairs. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T. (2014). NGOs: A new history of transnational civil society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deva, S. (2021). Business and human rights: Alternative approaches to transnational regulation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-113020-074527
   Google Scholar
• Durkee, M. J. (2021). Interpretive entrepreneurs. Virginia Law Review, 107(3), 431–493.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, L., & LeBaron, G. (2019). Big audit firms as regulatory intermediaries in transnational labor governance. Regulation & Governance, 13(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. (2013). Theorizing the power of global companies. In J. Mikler (Ed.), Handbook of global policy series. The handbook of global companies (pp. 77–95). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in the international system. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), The emergence of private authority in global governance (pp. 3–22). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, A. (2010). Multi-level governance and organized interests. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 153–167). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jos, J. (2022). Legal waivers in settlement agreements: Implications on access to remedies in business and human rights. Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2120765
   Google Scholar
• Kustermans, J., & Horemans, R. (2022). Four conceptions of authority in international relations. International Organization, 76(1), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1974).
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, R., & Rebernak, K. (2007). Closing the credibility gap: The challenges of corporate responsibility reporting. Environmental Quality Management, 16(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20137
   Google Scholar
• Maher, R. (2020). De-contextualized corporate human rights benchmarks: Whose perspective counts? See disclaimer. Business and Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2019.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVey, M. (2022). Untangling the authority of external experts in the corporate implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2105646
   Google Scholar
• Mende, J. (2021a). Are human rights western—and why does it matter? A perspective from international political theory. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219832992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mende, J. (2021b). Private actors, NGOs and civil society in multilevel governance. In A. Benz, J. Broschek, & M. Lederer (Eds.), A research agenda for multilevel governance (pp. 171–189). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781789908374.00017
   Google Scholar
• Mende, J. (2022). Business authority in global governance: Companies beyond public and private roles. Journal of International Political Theory, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882221116924
   Google Scholar
• Partiti, E. (2021). Polycentricity and polyphony in international law: Interpreting the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(1), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000469
   Google Scholar
• Peters, A., Koechlin, L., Förster, T., & Zinkernagel, G. F. (Eds.) (2009). Non-state actors as standard setters. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (2005). The private production of public goods: Private and public norms in global governance. In E. Grande & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Complex sovereignty: Reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century (pp. 217–237). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: Bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarfaty, G. A. (2015). Measuring corporate accountability through global indicators. In B. Kingsbury, K. E. Davis, & S. E. Merry (Eds.), The quiet power of indicators: Measuring governance, corruption, and rule of law (pp. 103–132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871532.004
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, R. (2011). Socially responsible private regulation: World-culture or world-capitalism? Law & Society Review, 45(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00439.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. (2017). Evidence for hope: Making human rights work in the 21st century. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2015). The output legitimacy of international organizations and the global public interest. International Theory, 7(2), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971915000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Inst. Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M., & Venzke, I. (2017). From public international to international public law: Translating world public opinion into international public authority. European Journal of International Law, 28(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2009). Multinational corporations and global justice: The human rights obligations of a quasi-governmental institution. Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and corporations: Conflict and collaboration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar