An empirical study of school‐based planning for the use of information technology to improve the quality of education in the twenty‐first century

References

• Anderson , R.E. and Dexter , S.L. 2005 . School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect . Educational Administration Quarterly , 41 (1) : 49 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Collins , K.M.T. , Onwuegbuzie , A.J. and Jiao , Q.G. 2006 . Prevalence of mixed‐methods sampling designs in social science research . Evaluation and Research in Education , 19 (2) : 83 – 101 .
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council . 2002 . Personal, social and humanities education key learning area curriculum guide (P1–S3) , Hong Kong : Curriculum Development Council .
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority . 2007 . Liberal studies: Curriculum guide and assessment guide (secondary 4–6) , Hong Kong : Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority .
   Google Scholar
• Education and Manpower Bureau . 1998 . Information technology for learning in a new era: Five‐year strategy – 1998/99 to 2002/03 , Hong Kong : Education and Manpower Bureau .
   Google Scholar
• Education and Manpower Bureau . 2004 . Empowering learning and teaching with information technology , Hong Kong : Education and Manpower Bureau .
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau . 2008 . Right technology at the right time for the right task , Hong Kong : Education Bureau .
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan , L. and Jacobsen , M. 2003 . Technology leadership for the twenty‐first century principal . Journal of Educational Administration , 41 (2) : 124 – 142 .
   Google Scholar
• Gibson , I.W. 2002 . Leadership, technology, and education: Achieving a balance in new school leader thinking and behavior in preparation for twenty‐first century global learning environments . Technology, Pedagogy and Education , 11 (3) : 315 – 334 .
   Google Scholar
• Gülbahar , Y. 2007 . Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools . Computers and Education , 49 (4) : 943 – 956 .
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo‐Silver , C.E. 2004 . Problem‐based learning: What and how do students learn? . Educational Psychology Review , 16 (3) : 235 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski , V. 2002 . Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Kong , S.C. 2007 . The development and validation of an information literacy model for Hong Kong students: Key issues in the professional development of teachers for capacity building . Technology, Pedagogy and Education , 16 (1) : 57 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Kong , S.C. 2008 . A curriculum framework on implementing information technology in school education for fostering information literacy . Computers and Education , 51 (1) : 129 – 141 .
   Google Scholar
• Lyons , H. 2009 . Case study research methodology for publishing developments in ICT‐facilitated learning in higher education – A prescriptive approach . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 46 (1) : 27 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Mooij , T. and Smeets , E. 2000 . Modeling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools . Computers and Education , 36 (3) : 265 – 281 .
   Google Scholar
• Nance , J.P. 2003 . Public school administrators and technology policy making . Educational Administration Quarterly , 39 (4) : 434 – 467 .
   Google Scholar
• North Central Regional Educational Laboratory . 2003 . enGauge® 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age Retrieved August 31, 2007, from http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/skills.htm
   Google Scholar
• Parker , A. and Tritter , J. 2006 . Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate . International Journal of Research and Method in Education , 29 (1) : 23 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino , J.W. 2004 . “ Commentary: Designs for research on technology and assessment: Conflicting or complementary agendas? ” . In Using technology evaluation to enhance student learning , Edited by: Haertel , G.D. and Means , B. 49 – 56 . New York : Teachers College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rowan , B. and Miller , R.J. 2007 . Organizational strategies for promoting instructional change: Implementation dynamics in schools working with comprehensive school reform providers . American Educational Research Journal , 44 (2) : 252 – 297 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salovaara , H. 2005 . An exploration of students' strategy use in inquiry‐based computer‐supported collaborative learning . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 21 (1) : 39 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Steffens , K. 2006 . Self‐regulated learning in technology‐enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review . European Journal of Education , 41 (3/4) : 353 – 379 .
   Google Scholar
• Tearle , P. 2004 . A theoretical and instrumental framework for implementing change in ICT in education . Cambridge Journal of Education , 34 (3) : 331 – 351 .
   Google Scholar
• Wall , K. , Higgins , S. , Miller , J. and Packard , N. 2006 . Developing digital portfolios: Investigating how digital portfolios can facilitate pupil talk about learning . Technology, Pedagogy and Education , 15 (3) : 261 – 273 .
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead , B.M. , Jenson , D.F.N. and Boschee , F. 2003 . Planning for technology: A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt , R.L. and Looper , S. 2004 . So you have to have a portfolio: A teacher's guide to preparation and presentation , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar