Collaborative 3D learning games for future learning: teachers’ instructional practices to enhance shared knowledge construction among students

References

• Arvaja, M. (2012). Personal and shared experiences as resources for meaning making in a philosophy of science course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17, 448–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagley, E., & Shaffer, D. W. (2009). When people get in the way: Promoting civic thinking through epistemic gameplay. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1, 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. (2010, September). Approaches to understanding students’ dialogues: Articulating multiple modes of interaction. Keynote speaker lecture presented to an EARLI SIG 17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction. Jena, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefit of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning & Instruction, 17, 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 227–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., Boyle, E., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education, 59, 661–686. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations: Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 28, 532–533. doi:10.1126/science.1127750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups by introducing roles: Do students act in line with assigned roles? Small Group Research, 39, 770–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning. Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers & Education, 50, 98–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R. (2011). Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: A design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R., & Oksanen, K. (2012). Challenge of supporting vocational learning: Empowering collaboration in a scripted 3D game – How does teachers’ real-time orchestration make a difference? Computers & Education, 59, 281–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6, 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41, 397–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. (2010). Roles, design, and the nature of CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 551–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 51–64). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., & Häkkinen, P. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, C. A., Nacke, L., & Sennersten, C. C. (2008). Dissecting play – Investigating the cognitive and emotional motivations and affects of computer gameplay. In Proceeding of CGAMES (pp. 9–16). Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhampton. Retrieved from http://www.bth.se/fou/forskinfo.nsf/17e96a0dab8ab6a1c1257457004d59ab/f336e780df204cf4c125753d003d3b45/$file/Lindley-Nacke-Sennersten-Dissecting-Play.pdf 31.8.2013
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (1994). Conflict and consensus: A general theory of collective decisions. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M. (2009). Online computer games as collaborative learning environments: Prospects and challenges for tertiary education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Price, S., Rogers, Y., Stanton, D., & Smith, H. (2003). A new conceptual framework for CSCL: Supporting diverse forms of reflection through multiple interactions. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe, Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 513–523). Bergen: InterMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. P., & Noah, P. (2008). Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: Antagonism between enjoyment and learning. Educational Media International, 45, 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Figueroa, M., & Gluckman, M. (2011, April). Testing a premise of inquiry based science instruction: Exploring small group processes and its link to student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LO.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W., & van der Veen, J. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58, 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Silseth, K. (2012). The multivoicedness of game play: Exploring the unfolding of a student’s learning trajectory in a gaming context at school. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2011, August). Game-based learning: A review on the effectiveness of educational games. Paper presented at European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction conference, Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Villalta, M., Gajardo, I., Nussbaum, M., Andreu, J. J., Echeverría, A., & Plass, J. L. (2011). Design guidelines for Classroom Multiplayer Presential Games (CMPG). Computers & Education, 57, 2039–2053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. I., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 281–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A., De, T., Freund, D., et al. (2008). The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 360–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games. A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar