579
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Use of an interculturally enriched collaboration script in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education

, , &
Pages 349-374 | Received 15 Jun 2013, Accepted 20 Jun 2014, Published online: 06 Aug 2014

References

  • Anderson, W., & Hiltz, S. (2001). Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: Effects on group process and consensus. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-34) (Vol. 1, pp. 1030–1044). January 3–6. [CD-ROM]. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926211
  • Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Behfar, K., Kern, M., & Brett, J. (2006). Managing challenges in multicultural teams. In Y. Chen (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: National culture and groups (Vol. 9, pp. 233–262). Oxford: Elsevier Science Press.
  • Carmien, S., Kollar, I., Fischer, G., & Fischer, F. (2007). The interplay of internal and external scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported Learning – Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 303–326). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 5–22.
  • Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behaviour on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827–847.
  • Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 21–34.
  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48, 56–66.
  • Gouveia, V. V., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. (2003). The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish population. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 43–63.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., López-Islas, J. R., Ramírez-Angel, N., & Megchun-Alpízar, R. M. (2001). A cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22, 85–121.
  • Hall, E. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  • Hathorn, L. G., & Ingram, A. L. (2002). Online collaboration: Making it work. Educational Technology, 42, 33–40.
  • Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Kim, K.-J., & Bonk, J. C. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of online collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 1–12.
  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. (2006). Computer-supported cooperation scripts – A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159–185.
  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 335–353.
  • Lim, J., & Liu, Y. (2006). The role of cultural diversity and leadership in computer-supported collaborative learning: A content analysis. Information & Software Technology, 48, 142–153.
  • Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Metcalf, L., & Bird, A. (2004). Integrating the Hofstede Dimensions and twelve aspects of negotiating behaviour: A six country comparison. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 251–269). Amsterdam: Brill.
  • Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C. H. (2000, October). Validation of the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale (OTSES). Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) International Convention, Denver CO.
  • Murray-Johnson, L., Witte, K., Liu, W. Y., Hubbell, A. P., Sampson, J., & Morrison, K. (2001). Addressing cultural orientations in fear appeals: Promoting AIDS-protective behaviors among Mexican immigrant and African American adolescents and American and Taiwanese college students. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 335–358.
  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Self-construals, communication processes and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research, 32, 19–54.
  • Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Brinkman, D., Kuznetsov, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitation of computer-supported collaborative learning in mixed- versus same-culture dyads: Does a collaboration script help? The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 36–48.
  • Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A., & Noroozi, O. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education: A study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 302–317.
  • Popov, V., Noroozi, O., Barrett, J., Biemans, H. J. A., Teasley, S. D., Slof, B., et al. (2014). Perceptions and experiences of, and outcomes for, university students in culturally diversified dyads in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 186–200.
  • Prykarpatska, I. (2008). Why are you late? Cross-cultural pragmatic study of complaints in American English and Ukrainian. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 87–102.
  • Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2004). Negotiating culture in cyberspace: Participation patterns and problematics. Language Learning and Technology, 8, 88–105.
  • Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 201–241.
  • Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., & Neuwirth, C. (2004). Taking it out of context: Collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 604–613). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C. H., & Muis, K. R. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59.
  • Stahl, G. (2010). Guiding group cognition in CSCL. International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 255–258.
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effects of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195–229.
  • Swigger, K., Hoyt, M., Serçe, F. C., Victor, V., & Alpaslan, F. N. (2012). The temporal communication behaviours of global software development student teams. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 384–392.
  • Tapanes, M. A., Smith, G. G., & White, J. A. (2009). Cultural diversity in online learning: A study of the perceived effects of dissonance in levels of individualism/collectivism and tolerance of ambiguity. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 26–34.
  • Ting-Toomey, S., Oetzel, J. G., & Yee-Jung, K. (2001). Self-construal types and conflict management styles. Communication Reports, 14, 87–105.
  • Uzuner, S. (2009). Questions of culture in distance learning: A research review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 1–11.
  • Vatrapu, R. (2008). Cultural considerations in computer supported collaborative learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 159–201.
  • Vatrapu, R., & Suthers, D. (2007). Culture and computers: A review of the concept of culture and implications for intercultural collaborative online learning. In T. Ishida, S. R. Fussell, & P. T. J. M. Vossen (Eds.), Intercultural collaboration I: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 260–275). sNew York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weinberger, A., Clark, D. B., Hakkinen, P., Tamura, Y., & Fischer, F. (2007). Argumentative knowledge construction in online learning environments in and across different cultures: A collaboration script perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 68–79.
  • Weinberger, A., Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., & Stegmann, K. (2013). Inducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 333–349.
  • Woldan, A. (2009). Cultural dimensions in Ukraine. In J. Besters-Dilger (Ed.), Ukraine on its way to Europe. Interim results of the Orange Revolution (pp. 275–307). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Zhu, C. (2009). E-learning in higher education: Student and teacher variables in the Chinese and Flemish cultural context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ghent.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.