273
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A computer-supported method to reveal and assess Personal Professional Theories in vocational education

, , , &
Pages 613-629 | Received 03 Dec 2014, Accepted 02 Jun 2015, Published online: 27 Jan 2016

References

  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluation assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2, 114–129.
  • Baartman, L. K. J. & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6, 125–134.
  • Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 5–26.
  • Biemans, H., Nieuwenhuis, L., Poell, R., Mulder, M., & Wesselink, R. (2004). Competence-based VET in the Netherlands: Background and pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 523–538.
  • Bilderbeek, R. J. C. (2013). Brainweaver [C++] (Version 42). Retrieved from http://www.richelbliderbeek.nl/ProjectBrainweaver.htm
  • Buitink, J. (1998). In-functie opleiden en in-functie leren van aanstaande leraren (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Groningen: UCLO.
  • Cañas, A. J., Coffey, J. W., Carnot, M. J., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Pensacola, FL: The Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
  • Clariana, R. B. (2010). Multi-decision approaches for eliciting knowledge structure. In D. Ifentaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 41–59). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Cooke, N. J. (1994). Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 41, 801–849.
  • de Jong, T., & Fergusson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31, 105–113.
  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Routledge.
  • Eraut, M. (2009). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Educational policy: A critical perspective (pp. 65–82). London: Routledge.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organisation, 7, 211–223.
  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
  • Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 56–73.
  • Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hofmann (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hurlbert, S. H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52, 577–586.
  • Huyts, P. M., de Bruijn, E., & Schaap, H. (2011). Revealing personal professional theories. Quality and Quantity, 45, 783–800.
  • Kelchtermans, G., & Hamilton, M. L. (2004). The dialectics of passion and theory: Exploring the relationship between self-study and emotion. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. Kubler LaBoskey, & T. Russel (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practice (pp. 785–810). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kim, M. G. (2012). Cross-validation study of methods and technologies to assess mental models in a complex problem solving situation. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 703–717.
  • Liu, J. (2013). The assessment agent system: Design, development, and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 197–215.
  • Locke, J. (1924). An essay concerning human understanding (L. Pringle-Pattison, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lund, A. M. (1997). Expert ratings of usability maxims. Ergonomics in Design, 5, 15–20.
  • McGraw, K. L., & Harbison-Briggs, K. (1989). Knowledge acquisition: Principles and guidelines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Messick, S. (1990) Validity of test interpretation and use ( Research Report No. ETS-RR-90-11). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
  • Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2010). Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 58, 3–18.
  • Rauner, F. (2007). Practical knowledge and occupational competence. European Journal of Vocational Training, 40, 52–66.
  • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schaap, H., de Bruijn, E., van der Schaaf, M. F., Baartman, L. K. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Explicating students’ personal professional theories in competence-based vocational education through multi-method triangulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 567–586.
  • Schaap, H., de Bruijn, E., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Students’ personal professional theories in competence-based vocational education: The construction of personal knowledge through internalisation and socialisation. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61, 481–494.
  • Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 205–221.
  • Scott, A. A., Clayton, J. E., & Gibson, E. L. (1991). A practical guide to knowledge acquisition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W. (1992). The nature of knowledge in composition and literary understanding: The question of specificity. Review of Educational Science, 62, 279–305.
  • Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. M. L. (2004). Extending richness with reach: Participation and knowledge. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Trochim, W. M. K., & Cabrera, D. (2005). The complexity of concept mapping for policy analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 7, 11–22.
  • Verloop, N. (2009). De leraar. In N. Verloop & L. Lowyck (Eds.), Onderwijskunde [Educational science] (pp. 195–284). Groningen: Noordhoff Uitgevers.
  • Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? The American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137–158.
  • Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.