What teachers do: facilitating the writing process with feedback from EssayCritic and collaborating peers

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1999). Transcript notation – Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13, 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M. (2017). Strategies and shoes: Can we ever have enough? Teaching and using reading comprehension strategies in general and vocational programmes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 76–94. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1075310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010). Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 41–58. doi:10.1080/09695940903565545.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R., & Sørhus, T. B. (2009). Passage engelsk vg1 studieforberedende program [Passage. English for general studies programme, 1 year]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840975.004.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, S. S.-F., & Hortin, J. A. (1993). Teachers’ perceptions of instructional technology and staff development. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22, 83–98. doi:10.2190/xb76-wy26-cv9q-h9al.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, G. K., & O’Neil Jr, H. F. (1997). Methodological approaches to online scoring of essays. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED418101
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (2001). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. DOCUMENT RESUME, 31. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED341383.pdf#page=31
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. (2009). A sociocultural reflection on formative assessment and collaborative challenges in the states of Jersey. Research Papers in Education, 24, 77–93. doi:10.1080/13669870801945909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Río, P., & Álvarez, A. (2007). Inside and outside the zone of proximal development: An ecofunctional reading of Vygotsky. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 276–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521831040.012.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., … Sherin, M. G. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1640
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2015). Designing tasks which engage learners with knowledge. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Designing tasks in secondary education: Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeness, I., & Mørch, A. (2016). Developing writing skills in English using content-specific computer-generated feedback with EssayCritic. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 118–135. doi:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-02-03.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Galperin, P. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & I. Maltzman (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 249–273). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. N., & Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment and learning. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/geertz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, V., & Betts, F. (1994). From the lagging to the leading edge. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 24–29. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ508285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenen, J. (2001). Outlining the teaching–learning process: Piotr Gal'perin’s contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11, 157–170. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00020-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Throndsen, I., Lie, S., & Dale, E. L. (2012). Assessment with distinctly defined criteria: A research study of a national project. Policy Futures in Education, 10, 421–433.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.279.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukich, K. (2000). Beyond automated essay scoring. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(5), 22–27. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=889104
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Cheung, W. K. W., Wong, K. C. K., & Lee, F. S. L. (2013). Immediate web-based essay critiquing system feedback and teacher follow-up feedback on young second language learners’ writings: An experimental study in a Hong Kong secondary school. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 39–60. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.630672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Wong, K. C., Cheung, W. K., & Lee, F. S. (2009). Web-based essay critiquing system and EFL students’ writing: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 57–72. doi:10.1080/09588220802613807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64, 199–213. doi:10.3138/cmlr.64.1.199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language learning, 45, 605–651. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, A., Cheung, W., Wong, K., Liu, J., Lee, C., Lam, M., & Tang, J. (2005). Grounding collaborative knowledge building in semantics-based critiquing. In R. H. Lau, Q. Li, R. Cheung, & W. Liu (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning – ICWL 2005, Vol. 3583 (pp. 244–255). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190025
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, A. I., Engeness, I., Cheng, V. C., Cheung, W. K., & Wong, K. C. (2017). EssayCritic: Writing to learn with a knowledge-based design critiquing system. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 216–226. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/90002176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 71(3), 11–14. Retrieved from http://www.larue.k12.ky.us/userfiles/1085/Teach%20Reading%20as%20Process%20Not%20Product%20Article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289.
   Google Scholar
• Rambusch, J. (2006, July). Situated learning and Galperin’s notion of object-oriented activity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/docs/p1998.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. Tesol Quarterly, 28, 273–292. doi:10.2307/3587434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindal, U. (2010). Constructing identity with L2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14, 240–261. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindal, U., & Piercy, C. (2013). Being ‘neutral’? English pronunciation among Norwegian learners. World Englishes, 32, 211–229. doi:10.1111/weng.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41, 255–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G., & Rizavi, S. (2000). Comparing computerized and human scoring of students’ essays. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463324.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2007). Teaching English by design: How to create and carry out instructional units. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498476
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Gamlem, S. M., Sandal, A. K., Engelsen, K. S., & Tong, K.-W. (2016). Educating for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy. Cogent Education, 3, 1227021. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1227021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. & Arievitch, I. (2002). Teaching, learning and development: A post-Vygotskian perspective. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the twenty-first century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 84–87). London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (2012). Stimulating reluctant writers: A Vygotskian approach to teaching writing in secondary schools. English in Education, 46, 85–100. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01117.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (2013). The mediation of learning in the zone of proximal development through a co-constructed writing activity. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 247–276. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/nctefiles/resources/journals/rte/0473-feb2013/rte0473mediation.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). New York, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Winerip, M. (2012, April 12). Facing a robo-grader? Just keep obfuscating mellifluously. New York Times. Retrieved from http://thelawsofrobotics2013.iankerr.ca/files/2013/09/49-Facing-a-RoboGrader.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3–17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002.
   Google Scholar