832
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Can telecollaboration contribute to the TPACK development of pre-service teachers?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 367-380 | Received 09 Nov 2016, Accepted 29 Jan 2018, Published online: 23 May 2018

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 281–300.
  • Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 547–564.
  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52, 154–168.
  • Archambault, L. (2016). Exploring the use of qualitative methods to examine TPACK. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 65–86). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers and Education, 55, 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K–12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 71–88.
  • Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery, and tension in Internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1, 3–39.
  • Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course: CLIL module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  • Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Exploring teachers’ use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities. Computers & Education, 82, 250–262.
  • Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 419–432.
  • Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2013). Interactional feedback in Synchronous Voice-based Computer Mediated Communication: Effect of dyad. System, 41, 543–559.
  • Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & García Esteban, S. (2016). Telecollaboration to improve CLIL and TPACK knowledge: Aid or hindrance? Estudios Sobre Educación (ESE), 31, 117–138.
  • Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Kleban, M. (2016). Matching linguistic and pedagogical objectives in a telecollaboration project: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 148–168.
  • Clark, J. S., Brown, J. S., & Jandildinov, M. (2016). Enriching preservice teachers’ critical reflection through an international videoconference discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24, 431–450.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2007a). Barriers and enablers in integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a Web-based educational technology course for K–12 (primary and secondary) teacher education. ALT-J, 15, 119–130.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2007b). Integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a web-based educational technology course for P–12 teacher education. Computers & Education, 51, 506–518.
  • Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gap: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25, 4–29.
  • Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6, 119–129.
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurer, E., & Sendurer, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423–435.
  • European Commission. (2007). Key competences for lifelong learning. European framework of reference. Luxembourg: Author.
  • Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2012). TPACK-in-practice: Developing 21st century teacher knowledge. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 4683–4689). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Fuchs, C., Hauck, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 82–102.
  • García Esteban, S. (2015). Teaching CLIL with digital literacies. Verbeia, 47–63.
  • García-Valcárcel, A., Basilotta, V., & López, C. (2014). Las TIC en el aprendizaje colaborativo en el aula de Primaria y Secundaria [ICT in collaborative learning in the classrooms of primary and secondary education] . Comunicar, 42, 65–74.
  • García-Valcárcel, A., & Martín del Pozo, M. (2016). ¿ Se sienten preparados los graduados en maestro de primaria para afrontar la profesión docente? [Do graduates of the Bachelor Degree in Primary Education feel prepared for the teaching profession?]. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 68(2), 69–84.
  • Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.
  • Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2004). Computer-mediated learning groups: Benefits and challenges to using group work in online learning environments. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 181–214). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21, 166–185.
  • Guichon, N., & Hauck, M. (2011). Editorial: Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in demand than ever. ReCALL, 23( Special Issue 3), 187–199.
  • Hampel, R. (2009). Training teachers for the multimedia age: Developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 35–50.
  • Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70–83.
  • Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19, 197–217.
  • Hockly, N. (2000). Modelling and ‘cognitive apprenticeship’ in teacher training. ELT Journal, 54, 118–125.
  • Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45, 83–106.
  • Hofer, M. J., & Owings-Swan, K. (2005). Digital moviemaking: The harmonization of technology, pedagogy and content. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1, 102–110.
  • INTEF. (2014) Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Borrador con propuestas de descriptores v1.0 [Common Digital Competence Framework for teachers. Draft with descriptors v 1.0]. Retrieved from http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2015/10/13/marco-comun-de-competencia-digital-docente-version-en-ingles/
  • Jauregi, K. (2015). Task development for telecollaboration among youngsters. In J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, M. Oberhofer, & M. Gutiérrez-Colón Plana (Eds.), Proceedings of task design and call: Seventeenth international CALL conference (pp. 312–321). Tarragona: Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Retrieved from http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2015/10/13/marco-comun-de-competencia-digital-docente-version-en-ingles/
  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated Technological Pedagogical Science Knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, 55, 1259–1269.
  • Kaye, A. (1989). Computer-mediated communication and distance education. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  • Kleban, M. & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2015). Creating pedagogical knowledge through electronic materials in a telecollaboration project for pre-service teacher trainees. In A. M. Sanz, A. M. Levy, F. Blin, & D. Barr (Eds.), WorldCALL: Sustainability and computer-assisted language learning (pp. 39–52). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Koehler, M., Greenhalgh, S., Rosenberg, J., & Keenan, S. (2017). What the tech is going on with teachers’ digital teaching portfolios? Using the TPACK framework to analyze teachers’ technological understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25, 31–59.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740–762.
  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.
  • Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Jyväskylä: UniCOM, Continuing Education Centre, University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/doc491_en.pdf
  • McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teacher design knowledge for technology enhanced learning: An ecological framework for investigating assets and needs. Instructional Science, 43, 181–202.
  • Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker-Van Strander, S., Tseng, C., & You, J. (2006). Expert–novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education and CALL (pp. 283–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
  • Niess, M. L., van Zee, E., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2010–11). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: Moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(2), 42–52.
  • O’Dowd, R. (2013). The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43, 194–207. doi:10.1080/09571736.2013.853374.
  • O’Dowd, R., & Waire, P. (2009). Critical issues in collaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 173–188.
  • Olofson, M. W., Swallow, M. J., & Neumann, M. D. (2016). TPACKing: A constructivist framing of TPACK to analyze teachers’ construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 95, 188–201.
  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pennock-Speck, B. (2013). Teaching competences through ICTs in an English degree programme in a Spanish setting. In M. Pérez Cañado (Ed.), Competency-based language teaching in higher education (pp. 107–118). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Phillips, M. (2016). Re-contextualising TPACK: Exploring teachers’ (non-)use of digital technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25, 555–571.
  • Polisca, P. (2011). Language learning and the raising of cultural awareness through Internet telephony: A case study. The Language Learning Journal, 39, 329–343.
  • Roig, R., Mengual, S., & Quinto, P. (2015). Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares del profesorado de Primaria [Primary teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge]. Comunicar, 45, 151–159. doi:10.3916/C45-2015-16.
  • Schmid, E. C., & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). Collaborative research projects in the technology-enhanced language classroom: Pre-service and in-service teachers exchange knowledge about technology. ReCALL, 26, 315–332.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 123–149.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), 1–9. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
  • Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312.
  • Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2016). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 462–472. doi:10.1111/bjet.12380.
  • Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2016). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 151–177. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556.
  • UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. Paris: Author.
  • Vasileiou, V. N., & Paraskeva, F. (2010). Teaching role-playing instruction in Second Life: An exploratory study. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 5, 25–50.
  • Vinagre, M. (2016). Developing key competences for life-long learning through virtual collaboration: Teaching ICT in English as a medium of instruction. In C. Wang & L. Winstead, Handbook of research on foreign language education in the digital age (pp. 170–187). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).
  • Von Der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). Modern Language Journal, 85, 210–225.
  • Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2016). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 69–83. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730.
  • Zaragoza-Ninet, M. G., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2010). Implementation of an innovation in education project in the degree of English studies at the University of Valencia. Porta Linguarum, 13, 103–118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.