Online content-focused coaching to improve classroom discussion quality

References

• Adedeji, S. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2011). Improving the conditions of teachers and teaching in rural schools across African countries. UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCO-IICBA.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A. C., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. (2015). Enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement: Replication and extension of the My Teaching Partner-Secondary intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8, 475–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2006). President’s message: Reading specialists, reading teachers, reading coaches: A question of credentials. Reading Today, 23(4), 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Education Research Journal, 40, 685–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R., & Deford, D. (2012). Do’s and don’ts for literacy coaches: Advice from the field. Urbana, IL: Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse, National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. B. (2006). Improving comprehension with Questioning the Author: A fresh and expanded view of a powerful approach. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching professional development programs. Mathematics Education, 43, 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Burgan, M., & Gleick, P. H. (2008). Not a drop to drink: Water for a thirsty world. Washington, DC: National Geographic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cady, J., & Reardon, K. (2009). Delivering online professional development in mathematics to rural educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6(11), 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• d’Andrade, R. G., & Strauss, C. (Eds.). (1992). Human motives and cultural models (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S., Magidin de Kramer, R., O’Dwyer, L. M., Masters, J., & Russell, M. (2012). Impact of online professional development on teacher quality and student achievement in fifth grade mathematics. Journal of Research on Teacher Education, 45, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downer, J. T., Kraft-Sayre, M. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Ongoing, web-based professional development focused on teacher–child interactions: Early childhood educators’ usage rates and self-reported satisfaction. Early Education and Development, 20, 321–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downer, J. T., Pianta, R. C., Fan, X., Hamre, B. K., Mashburn, A., & Justice, L. (2011). Effects of web-based teacher professional development on the language and literacy skills of children enrolled in prekindergarten programs. NHSA Dialog, 14, 189–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duessen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). ‘Coach’ can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First. REL Northwest (REL 2007-No. 005). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson, D. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamse, B. C., Jacob, R. T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., Unlu, F., Bozzi, L., & Rosenblum, S. (2008). Reading First impact study final report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., … Zhu, P. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. NCEE 2008-4030. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C. (2010). Reading instruction for English language learners. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 684–710). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long? Economics of Education Review, 29, 432–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1997). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–47). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kucan, L. (2009). Engaging teachers in investigating their teaching as a linguistic enterprise: The case of comprehension instruction in the context of discussion. Reading Psychology, 30, 51–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(863).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. R., McCombs, J. S., & Marsh, J. (2010). Linking reading coaches and student achievement: Evidence from Florida middle schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 372–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, A. E. (2007). Effects of online versus face-to-face professional development with a team-based learning community approach on teachers’ application of a new instructional practice ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H., Slater, S. C., & Boston, M. B. (2008). Measuring instructional interactions ‘at-scale’. Educational Assessment, 13, 267–300.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2012). The effect of Content-Focused Coaching on text discussion quality: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2013). Literacy coaching, reading comprehension instruction and student achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Learning and Instruction, 25, 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283–297.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for development of instructional capacity. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 532–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., McVee, M. B., & Shanahan, L. E. (Eds.). (2015). Video reflection in literacy teacher education and development: Lessons from research and practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Park, L. S. (2010). A long walk to water. Boston, MA: Clarion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, G., & Gitomer, D. (2012). Content knowledge for teaching assessment development: Assessment of content knowledge for teaching for teachers of grades 4–6 English Language Arts. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., & Justice, L. (2008). Effects of web-based professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E., Burchinal, M. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on Head Start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. A., & Clarke, S. N. (Eds.). (2015) Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the Improvement of Practices through Intensive Coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailors, M., & Price, L. R. (2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., & Svaricek, R. (2014). Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3, 274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., Hughes, E. K., Engle, R. A., & Stein, M. K. (2009). Orchestrating discussions of challenging tasks: Keeping your eye on the mathematics to be learned. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14, 548–556.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford-Bowers, D. E. (2008). Persistence in online classes: A study of perceptions among community college stakeholders. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. C., West, L., & Bickel, D. D. (2003). What is Content-Focused Coaching? In L. West & F. C. Staub (Eds.), Content Focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons (pp. 1–17). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmach, B. L. (2011). A synthesis of international rural education issues and responses. Rural Educator, 32(2), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toll, C. A. (2018). Progress in literacy coaching success – A dozen years on. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Towers, J. (2007). Using video in teacher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 33(2).
   Google Scholar
• Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Comparing two teacher development programs for innovating reading comprehension instruction with regard to teachers’ experiences and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 543–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2018). Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators, and parents. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, S., De Laat, H., & Staring, C. (1998). Evaluation of a coaching programme for mentors of beginning teachers, Journal of In-Service Education, 24, 411–431.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon‐Feagans, L., Bratsch‐Hines, M., Varghese, C., Bean, A., & Hedrick, A. (2015). The Targeted Reading Intervention: Face‐to‐face vs. webcam literacy coaching of classroom teachers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon-Feagans, L., Kainz, K., Hedrick, A., Ginsberg, M., & Amendum, S. (2013). Live webcam coaching to help early elementary classroom teachers provide literacy instruction for struggling readers: The Targeted Reading Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1175–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigital. (1997–2015). Studiocode software 5.8.6. Vigital Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. (1994). A game of catch. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Children’s Books.
   Google Scholar