Components of learning in upper secondary teachers’ pedagogical patterns

References

• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2016). Investigating university educators’ design thinking and the implications for design support tools. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.404
   Google Scholar
• Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Exploring teachers’ use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities. Computers & Education, 82, 250–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., Cameron, L., Badilescu-Buga, E., & Bower, M. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(17), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.407
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, I., Finlay, J., & Fincher, S. (2011). Representing practice: Practice models, patterns, bundles …. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.553620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, S. (1999). Analysis of design: An exploration of patterns and pattern languages for pedagogy. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching: Special Issue CS-ED Research, 18(3), 331–348. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/15198/
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and educational design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1344
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology Supplement, 21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (2010). Learning, technology and design. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 1–28). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, A. (2010). Facilitator, researcher, politician, magician. Simulation & Gaming, 41(5), 681–693. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109334009
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, J. (2014). Studying the process of educational design: Revisiting Schön and making a case for reflective design-based research on teachers’ ‘conversations with situations’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.942748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 102, 244–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2018). Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, N., Li, L., Farias Herrera, L., Chan, A., & Pong, T.-C. (2017). A pattern language based learning design studio for an analytics informed inter-professional design community. Interaction Design & Architecture(s), 33, 92–112. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/33_5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2007). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masterman, E., & Manton, M. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.588414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2–3), 216–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2006.010632
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., & Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: Reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J. (2008). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Development process languages (pp. 1061–1081). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, G. N. H., & Bower, M. (2018). Novice teacher technology-enhanced learning design practices: The case of the silent pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niegemann, H., & Domagk, S. (2005). ELEN project evaluation report. Report of Work package 5. Ref num: 101421-CY-2002-1-CY-MINERVA-MMP. http://www2.tisip.no/E-LEN
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S., Agostinho, S., & Hedberg, J. G. (2013). Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 102–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, L., & Willermark, S. (2019). TPACK In situ: A design-based approach supporting professional development in practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1186–1226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118783180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, A., Dumont, H., Lafuente, M., & Law, N. (2018). Understanding innovative pedagogies: Key themes to analyse new approaches to teaching and learning. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 172. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9f843a6e-en.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C., & Soltis, J. F. (2009). Perspectives on learning. Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. P., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Martínez-Monés, A., & Anguita-Martínez, R. (2010). Recurrent routines in the classroom madness: Pushing patterns past the design phase. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 499–507). Lancaster: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. P., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Martínez-Monés, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2011). Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1214–1227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retalis, S., Georgiakakis, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2006). Eliciting design patterns for e-learning systems. Computer Science Education, 16(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400600773323
   Google Scholar
• Rolf, E., Knutsson, O., & Ramberg, R. (2019). An analysis of digital competence as expressed in design patterns for technology use in teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3361–3375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S. (2008). Designs of learning and the formation and transformation of knowledge in an era of globalization. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 267–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S. Y. H. (2020). Using patterns-based learning design for CALL tasks. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1657902
   Google Scholar
• Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–36). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Learning design: European approaches. TechTrends, 64(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00498-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, N., & Mor, Y. (2008). IDR: A participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 579–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar