References
- Agbatogun, A. O. (2012). Exploring the efficacy of student response system in a sub-Saharan African country: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 250–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/1715
- Aljaloud, A. S., Gromik, N., Kwan, P., & Billingsley, W. (2019). Saudi undergraduate students’ perceptions of the use of smartphone clicker apps on learning performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3340
- Allen,J. (2007). Inside words: Tools for teaching academic vocabulary, grades 4–12). Stenhouse Publishers.
- Andik, A. (2013). Improving reading comprehension by using think, pair, and share technique. JP3, 1(12), 28–33.
- Anthis, K. (2011). Is it the clicker, or is it the question? Untangling the effects of student response system use. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 189–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411895
- Arnesen, K., Korpas, G. S., Hennissen, J. E., & Stav, J. B. (2013). Experiences with use of various pedagogical methods utilising a student response system–motivation and learning outcome. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11(3), 169–181 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016301.pdf.
- Baleghisadeh, S. (2010). The effect of pair work on a word-building task. ELT Journal, 64(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp097
- Baracaldo, D. (2019). Technology integration for the professional development of English teachers. Tecné, Episteme Y Didaxis: TED, 46, 157–168 http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ted/n46/0121-3814-ted-46-157.pdf.
- Bergtrom, G. (2006). Clicker sets as learning objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 105–110 http://ijello.org/Volume2/v2p105-110Bergtrom.pdf.
- Berry, J. (2009). Technology support in nursing education: Clickers in the classroom. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(5), 295–296 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19824239.
- Bijlsma, H. J. E., Visscher, A. J., Dobbelaer, M. J., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2019). Does smartphone-assisted student feedback affect teachers’ teaching quality? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1572534
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
- Cardoso, W. (2011). Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: The students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 393–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.567354
- Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2007). Investigating the effects of group response systems on student satisfaction, learning, and engagement in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.3.391
- Chen, H., Daito, M., & Lin, C. (2016). Effects of adding clickers to think-pair-share for learning English grammar. In P. Clements, A. Krause, and H. Brown (Eds.), Focus on the learner (pp. 461–467). JALT.
- Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies: Going to the MALL (Mobile Assisted Language Learning). Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.125/44040
- Conoley, J. W., Moore, G., Croom, B., & Flowers, J. (2006). A toy or a teaching tool? The use of audience-response systems in the classroom. Techniques, 81(7), 46–48.
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
- Dangel, H. L., & Wang, C. X. (2008). Student response systems in higher education: Moving beyond linear teaching and surface learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0101.08
- Demirci, C., & Duzenli, H. (2017). Formative value of an active learning strategy: Technology based think-pair-share in an EFL writing classroom. World Journal of Education, 7(6), 63–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n6p63
- Fitzgerald, D. (2013). Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3) , 88–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.01.006
- Gray, K., & Steer, D. N. (2012). Personal response systems and learning: It is the pedagogy that matters, not the technology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(5), 80–88.
- Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J. G. (2014). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514648
- Hedgcock, W. H., & Rouwenhorst, R. M. (2014). Clicking their way to success: Using student response systems as a tool for feedback. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 22(2), 16–25.
- Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013
- Jebur, M. S., Jasim, H. H., & Jaboori, H. R. (2013). The effect of using think-pair-share technique on EFL students’ achievement in the course of general English. Journal of College of Basic Education, 19(80), 823–838 https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/477899a1d42bf4d1.
- Kaiser, C. M., & Wisniewski, M. A. (2012). Enhancing student learning and engagement using student response systems. Social Studies Research & Practice, 7(3), 137–149.
- Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912454808
- Koçoğlu, Z. (2009). Exploring the technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre- service teachers in language education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2734–2737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.485
- Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (2004). New directions for lifelong learning using network technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 689–700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00427.x
- Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revised and updated version]. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley.
- Kurt, G., Akyel, A., Koçoğlu, Z., & Mishra, P. (2014). TPACK in practice: A qualitative study on technology integrated lesson planning and implementation of Turkish pre-service teachers of English. ELT Research Journal, 3(3), 153–166 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63644.
- Langman, J., & Fies, C. (2010). Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners. Language and Education, 24(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780903096553
- Latham, A., & Hill, N. S. (2014). Preference for anonymous classroom participation: Linkingstudent characteristics and reactions to electronic response systems. Journal of Management Education, 38(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913488109
- Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Language Teaching Publications.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
- Lyubartseva, G. (2013). Influence of audience response system technology on student performance in organic chemistry lecture class. Education, 133(4), 439–443.
- McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Moredich, C., & Moore, E. (2007). Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems. Nurse Educator, 32(3), 113–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNE.0000270225.76661.74
- Mork, C. (2014). Benefits of using online student response systems in Japanese EFL classrooms. JALT CALL Journal, 10(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v10n2.171
- Nielsen, K. L., Hansen, G., & Stav, J. B. (2013). Teaching with student response systems (SRS): Teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18989
- Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative curriculum. Cambridge University Press.
- Nunan, D. (2005). Important tasks of English education: Asia-wide and beyond. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1).
- Oz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p119
- Pardosi, P. S. R. (2013). Improving students’ achievement in writing narrative text by using think pair share strategy. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 2(2), 301–312 https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jelt/article/view/912/719.
- Reay, N. W., Li, P., & Bao, L. (2008). Testing a new voting machine question methodology. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2820392
- Richardson, A. M., Dunn, P. K., McDonald, C., & Oprescu, F. (2015). CRiSP: An instrument for assessing student perceptions of classroom response systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 432–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9528-2
- Roswati., Z. M., & Radjab, D. (2014). Improving students’ speaking skill by using think- pair-share strategy at the second semester of Syariah class A at language center of Uin Suska Riau. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–12 http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/elt/article/download/4602/3642.
- Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
- Schwieter, J. W. (2013). Studies and global perspectives of second language teaching and learning. Information Age Publishing.
- Selinger, M. (2001). Learning information and communications technology skills and the subject context of learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 143–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200108
- Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Robinson, S. L., & Marston, D. (2000). Predicting classroom achievement from active responding on a computer-based groupware system. Remedial and Special Education, 21(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100107
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. (2006). Use of classroom response systems to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879802
- Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 237–257). Cambridge University Press.
- Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2014). Examining preservice EFL teachers’ TPACK competencies in Turkey. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2014.2.2
- Thornbury, S. (2006). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education India.
- Wu, Y. T., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in teaching English as a foreign language: Representation of primary teachers of English in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0240-7
- Yerigan, T. (2008). Getting active in the classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(6), 19–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v5i6.1250
- Yu, Z. (2014). The impact of clickers use on vocabulary knowledge and satisfaction in an EFL class in China. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(3), 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014070104
- Yu, Z. (2015). Indicators of satisfaction in clickers-aided EFL class. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00587
- Yuksel, I., & Yasin, E. (2014). Cross-sectional evaluation of English language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(2), 23–42 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061940.pdf.