The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell?

References

• Alain, E. C. 1928. Propos sur le bonheur. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., and T. D. Wilson. 2003. “Information Overload: Context and Causes.” The New Review of Information Behaviour Research 4 (1): 31–44. doi: 10.1080/14716310310001631426
   Google Scholar
• Attali, J. 1996. Chemins de sâgesse. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, F. 2000. Histoire du livre. Paris: A. Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1967. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Baschet, J. 2008. L'Iconographie médiévale. Paris: Folio.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1973. “Form, Substance and Difference.” In Steps to an Ecology of Mind, edited by G. Bateson, 423–440. London: Paladin.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., and D. Lyon. 2013. Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M. 1983. Une Technologie invisible: L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l’évolution des systèmes humains. Paris: Centre de Recherche en Gestion de l'Ecole Polytechnique.
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, C., P. Boncz, M. L. Brodie, and O. Erling. 2012. “The Meaningful Use of Big Data: Four Perspectives, Four Challenges.” ACM SIGMOD Record 40 (4): 56–60. doi: 10.1145/2094114.2094129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A., D. Muddiman, and H. Plant. 2007. The Early Information Society: Information Management in Britain Before the Computer. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boell, S., and D. Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2011. “Theorizing Information: From Signs to Sociomaterial Practices.” Paper presented at the 22nd Australasian conference on information systems, Sydney, Australia, November 30–December 2.
   Google Scholar
• Boisot, M. H. 1998. Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozzolo, C., and E. Ornato. 1983. Pour une histoire du livre manuscrit au Moyen Âge. Trois essais de codicologie quantitative. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Breton, P. 1990. La Tribu informatique. Paris: Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Burckhardt, T., and J. James. 2012. Chartres and the Birth of the Cathedral. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom Books.
   Google Scholar
• Case, G. 1997. Silence Descends: The End of the Information Age. Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2000. End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Changeux, J. P. 2006. L'homme neuronal. Paris: Hachette literature.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and T. Pinch. 1998. The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K., and C. Østerlund. 2013. “The Socio-materiality of Information – Documents and Work.” Minitrack Introduction presented at the 46th Hawaii international conference system sciences, Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii, January 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. E. 2008. The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, and Power. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debary, O., and P. Gabel. 2010. “Seconde main et deuxième vie. Objets, souvenirs et photographies. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez.” Nouvelle Série 40 (1): 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• De Mul, J. 2009. “Des machines morales.” Cités 39 (3): 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. [1664] 1988. Les passions de l’âme. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Virin.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. [1664] 1988. Principles of Philosophy (trans. by Blair Reynolds), Lewiston: E. Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Doolin, B., and L. McLeod. 2012. “Sociomateriality and Boundary Objects in Information Systems Development.” European Journal of Information Systems 21 (5): 570–586. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré, J., and M. Pansard. 2012. Chartres, la grâce d'une cathédrale. Paris: Editions Place des Victoires.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., and M. Mazmanian. 2013. “Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organization Practice.” In How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies, edited by P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, and H. Tsoukas ( Series on Perspectives on Process Organization Studies), 92–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, J.-P. 1994. Aux origines des sciences cognitives. Paris: La Découverte. (Also published as On the Origins of Cognitive Science: The Mechanization of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 1979. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, A., and A. Morris. 2000. “The Problem of Information Overload in Business Organisations: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Information Management 20 (1): 17–28. doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., and J. Mengis. 2004. “The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines.” The Information Society 20 (5): 325–344. doi: 10.1080/01972240490507974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Febvre, L., and H. J. Martin. 1958. L'apparition du livre. Paris: Albin Michel (L’évolution de l'Humanité).
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., and J. G. March. 1981. “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 171–186. doi: 10.2307/2392467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., and B. T. Pentland. 2003. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (1): 94–118. doi: 10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., and J. D. de Lannoy. 1991. Gestures and Speech: Psychological Investigations. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Franchi, S., and G. Güzeldere. 2005. “Machinations of the Mind: Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs.” In Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs, edited by S. Franchi and G. Güzeldere, 145–149. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. R. 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. 2012. The Information. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, M. D., and D. F. Hendry. 1993. “The Computer as Von Neumann Planned It.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 15 (1): 11–21. doi: 10.1109/85.194088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., and R. V. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” The British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, O. 2013. “Nervous Infrastructures: Cybernetics, Design and Ubiquitous Computing.” Paper presented at the History of Science Society conference (Panel: The History of Science and/as the History of Media), Boston, MA, November 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, O. 2014. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. V. 1928. “Transmission of information.” Bell System Technical Journal, 7 (3): 535–563. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1928.tb01236.x
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heims, S. J. 1991. The Cybernetics Group. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., and T. Dousa, eds. 2014. Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. 2004. “Marrying the Premodern to the Postmodern: Computers and organisms after World War II.” In Growing Explanations. Historical Perspectives on Recent Science, edited by M. N. Wise, 181–198. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. D. 2014. “The Ontological Turn in French Philosophical Anthropology Theory.” Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 259–269. doi: 10.14318/hau4.1.011
   Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux, N. R., and D. M. G. Raff, eds. 2007. Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leclerq, A., Carugati, A., Giangreco, A., da Cunha, J. V., and T. B. Jensen. 2009. “A Sociomaterial View of the Scaffolding of Work Practices with Information Technology.” Paper presented at the 30th international conference on information systems, Phoenix, Arizona, December 5–18, Paper 197. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/197.
   Google Scholar
• Le Moigne, J. L. 1990. La modélisation des systèmes complexes. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. 2011. “When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies.” MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. 2012. “Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How Are They Different? Do We Need Them?” In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, edited by P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, and J. Kallinikos, 25–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., and S. R. Barley. 2008. “Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing.” Information and Organization 18 (3): 159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, R. K. 2012. “What Is Information? Why Is It Relativistic and What Is Its Relationship to Materiality, Meaning and Organization?” Information 3 (1): 68–91. doi: 10.3390/info3010068
   Google Scholar
• Lorino, P., Tricard, B., and Y. Clot. 2011. “Research Methods for Non-representational Approaches to Organizational Complexity: The Dialogical Mediated Inquiry.” Organization Studies 32 (6): 769–801. doi: 10.1177/0170840611410807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. M. 1969. Information, Mechanisms and Meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. 1978. “Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality.” In Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lenneberg, edited by G. Millar and E. Lenneberg, 27–63. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V. 2011. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S., and W. Pitts. 1943. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.” The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (4): 115–133. doi: 10.1007/BF02478259
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, E., and C. Yoos. 2010. “Information about Information: A Taxonomy of Views.” MIS Quarterly 34 (2): 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. [1945] 2004. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1969. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. 2001. “Embodying Information Systems: The Contribution of Phenomenology.” Information and Organization 11 (2): 103–128. doi: 10.1016/S1471-7727(00)00005-1
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and C. Standing. 2014. What Is Information Such That There Can Be Information Systems? Canterbury: University of Kent, Kent Business School Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and L. Willcocks. 2014. “An Integrative Semiotic Framework for Information Systems: The Social, Personal and Material Worlds.” Information and Organization 24 (1): 48–70. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1978. Ecrits sur le signe. Paris: Editions du Seuil (see also Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–1954).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time. (Agency and Science). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2002. “Cybernetics and the Mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask.” Social Studies of Science 32 (3): 413–437. doi: 10.1177/0306312702032003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2005. “A Gallery of Monsters: Cybernetics and Self-organisation, 1940–1970.” In Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs, edited by S. Franchi and G. Güzeldere, 229–245. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2010. The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy 70: 699–711. doi: 10.2307/2025079
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H., ed. 1979. Philosophical Papers: Mind, Language and Reality (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rallet, A., and F. Rochelandet. 2011. “La régulation des données personnelles face au web relationnel: une voie sans issue?” Réseaux 167 (3): 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, D., S. Jackson, S. Geiger, M. Burton, and T. Finholt. 2013. “Artifacts That Organize: Delegation in the Distributed Organization.” Information and Organization 23 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, C. 2014. “You Lie! Identity, Paper and the Materiality of Information.” The Communication Review 17: 69–90. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2014.901056
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. 2003. “Early Modern Information Overload.” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2003.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serres, M. 2012. Petite poucette. Paris: Editions Le Pommier.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379.423, 623.656, July, October 1948. (Reproduced in Shannon, C. E. 2001. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 5 (1): 3–55. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=584093).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1990. “Information Technologies and Organizations [Interview].” The Accounting Review 65: 658–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1996. “Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World.” International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 70: 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Teulier, R., and P. Lorino. eds. 2005. Entre connaissance et organisation: l'activité collective. L'entreprise face au défi de la connaissance. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F.-X. 2012. “ Une comparaison Moyen Age-période contemporaine sur le rapport à l'information dans l'action collective organisée.” Cahier de Recherche de la Chaire Intelligence Economique et Stratégie des Organisations (IESO) 1.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F.-X. 2015. “The ‘Ontological Turn’ of Anthropology: Implications for Debates about Sociomateriality.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the European Group on Organization Studies (sub-theme 45: Materiality, Human Agency and Practice), Athens, July 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F.-X., and N. N. Mitev. 2013. “Space in Organizations and Sociomateriality.” In Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices, edited by F.-X. de Vaujany and N. Mitev, 1–21. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F.-X., N. N. Mitev, F. G. Lanzara, and A. Mukherjee, eds. 2015. Materiality, Rules and Regulation: New Trends in Management and Organization Studies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verdon, J. 2010. Information et désinformation au Moyen Age. Paris: Editions Perrin.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J. [1945] 1993. “First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 15 (4): 27–75. doi: 10.1109/85.238389
   Google Scholar
• Webster, F. 2007. Theories of the Information Society. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1990. “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies.” In Technology and Organizations, edited by P. S. Goodman and L. S. Sproull, 1–44. (The Jossey-Bass Management Series). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2007. Glut: Mastering Information Through the Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyner, A. 1974. “Recent Results in the Shannon Theory.” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 20 (1): 2–10. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1974.1055171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar