‘Would you prefer not to?’ Resetting/resistance across literature, culture, and organizations

References

• Alvesson, M., and Y. Gabriel. 2013. “Beyond Formulaic Research: In Praise of Greater Diversity in Organizational Research and Publications.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12 (2): 245–263. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benozzo, A., M. C. Pizzorno, H. Bell, and M. Koro-Ljungberg. 2015. “Coming Out but into What: Problematizing Discoursive Variations of Revealing the Gay Self in the Workplace.” Gender, Work and Organization 22 (3): 292–306. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benozzo, A., M. Koro-Ljungberg, and N. Carey. 2016 “Post/authorship: Five or More Ikea Customers in Search of an Author.” Qualitative Inquiry 22 (7): 568–580. doi: 10.1177/1077800415622490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benozzo, A., N. Carey, M. Cozza, C. Elmenhorst, N. Fairchild, M. Koro-Ljungberg, and C. A. Taylor. 2018. “Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: Post-qualitative Re-turnings.” Gender, Work and Organization. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/gwao.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, G. 2011. L’effet Bartleby. Paris: Hermann.
   Google Scholar
• Beverunger, A., and S. Dunne. 2007. “‘I’d Prefer Not To’. Bartleby and the Excesses of Interpretation.” Culture and Organization 13 (2): 171–183. doi: 10.1080/14759550701299941
   Google Scholar
• Biehl-Missal, B. 2015. “‘I Write Like a Painter’: Feminine Creation with Arts-Based Methods in Organizational Research.” Gender, Work and Organization 22 (2): 179–196. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12055
   Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., and S. D’Enbeau. 2014. “Intimate, Ambivalent and Erotic Mentoring: Popular Culture and Mentor-Mentee Relational Processes in Mad Men.” Human Relations 67 (6): 695–714. doi: 10.1177/0018726713503023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carveth, R., and J. B. South. 2010. Mad Men and Philosophy. Nothing Is as It Seems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., and C. Rhodes. 2006. “Strong Plots: Popular Culture in Management Practice and Theory.” In Management Education and Humanities, edited by P. Gagliardi and B. Czarniawska, 195–218. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, B., and P. G. de Monthoux, eds. 1994. Good Novels, Better Management: Reading Organizational Realities in Fiction. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1990. The Logic of Sense. Translated by M. Lester. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1993. Critique et clinique. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1975. Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild, N. 2016. “Plugging into the Umbra: Creative Experimentation (in)(on) the Boundaries of Knowledge Production in ECEC Research.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 7 (1): 16–30. doi: 10.7577/rerm.1823
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, G. 2006. “A Role for Humanities in the Formation of Managers.” In Management Education and Humanities, edited by P. Gagliardi and B. Czarniawska, 3–9. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, P., and B. Czarniawska, eds. 2006. Management Education and Humanities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2006. “A Journey Beyond Institutional Knowledge: Dante’s Reading of the Odyssey.” In Management Education and Humanities, edited by P. Gagliardi and B. Czarniawska 174–194. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, L. M. E., L. Kaganovsky, and R. A. Rushing, eds. 2013. Madmen, Madworld. Sex, Politics, Style, and the 1960s. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., and J. Holliday, eds. 1998. Organization-Representation: Work and Organization in Popular Culture. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H. 2002. “Hitchcock’s Vertigo and the Tragic Sublime.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 15 (1): 21–34. doi: 10.1108/09534810210417357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H. 2003. “Becoming a (Virile) Member: Women and Military Body.” Body and Society 9 (4): 13–30. doi: 10.1177/1357034X0394003
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and H. Willmott. 1999. Management Lives: Power and Identity in Work Organizations. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M. 2016. Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research. Methodologies without Methodology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kundera, M. 1986. L’Art du Roman. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1993. “Obsession: Validity After Poststructuralism.” The Sociological Quarterly 34 (4): 673–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., ed. 2016. Reset Modernity! Karlsruhe: ZKM, Center for Art and Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. 2005. “Cultural Geography: The Busyness of Being ‘More-Than-Representational’.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (1): 83–94. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2011. “Where are the Ruins?” Qualitative Inquiry 17 (10): 899–912. doi: 10.1177/1077800411423198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, E. 2016. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E., and B. Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, I., and C. Huber. 2012. “Kafka’s Mythology: Organization, Bureaucracy and the Limits of Sensemaking.” Human Relations 65 (4): 523–543. doi: 10.1177/0018726711430558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivetti Manoukian, F. 1994. “Power, Time, Talk and Money: Organization in Italian Literature.” In Good Novels, Better Management: Reading Organizational Realities in Fiction, edited by B. Czarniawska-Joerges and P. G. de Monthoux, 237–270. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., A. Pullen, and C. Rhodes. 2014. “Writing Organization as Gendered Practice: Interrupting the Libidinal Economy.” Organization Studies 35 (3): 313–333. doi: 10.1177/0170840613483656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, D. 2017. “Rethinking Organization Theory: The Fold, the Rhizome and the Seam Between Organization and the Literary.” Organization 24 (6): 800–818. doi: 10.1177/1350508416677176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A. 2016. “Cyborg Writing as a Political Act: Reading Donna Haraway in Organization Studies.” Gender, Work and Organization 23 (4): 431–446. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2012. “Parody, Subversion and the Politics of Gender at Work: The Case of Futurama’s ‘Ranging Bender’.” Organization 20 (4): 512–533. doi: 10.1177/1350508412447246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2001. “D’Oh: The Simpsons, Popular Culture, and the Organizational Carnival.” Journal of Management Inquiry 10 (4): 374–383. doi: 10.1177/1056492601104010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2002. “Coffee and the Business of Pleasure: The Case of Harbucks vs. Mr. Tweek.” Culture and Organization 8 (4): 374–383. doi: 10.1080/14759550215611
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., and A. D. Brown. 2005. “Writing Responsibly: Narrative Fiction and Organization Studies.” Organization 12 (4): 467–491. doi: 10.1177/1350508405052757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., and R. Westwood. 2008. Critical Representation of Work and Organization in Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, D. 2016. “Don’T Push That Botton.” In Reset Modernity!, edited by B. Latour and C. Leclercq, 24–41. Karlsruhe: ZKM, Center for Art and Media.
   Google Scholar
• Segarra, P., and A. Prasad. 2018. “How Does Corporeality Inform Theorizing? Revisiting Hannah Arendt and the Banality of the Evil.” Human Studies. doi:10.1007/s10746-018-9474-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2008. Non-representational Theory: Space/Politics/Affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the Field. On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1957. The Organization Man. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar