Writing birthing bodies: exploring the entanglements between flesh and materiality in childbirth

References

• Active Childbirth. 2018. Accessed May 28, 2018. https://aktiivinensynnytys.fi/tietoa/aktiivinen-synnytys/synnytyksen-fysiologia/.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. L., and C. Beasley. 2002. “Citizen Bodies: Is Embodied Citizenship a Contradiction in Terms?” Critical Social Policy 22 (2): 324–352.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., P. Choi, C. Henshaw, and J. Tree. 2005. “‘I Felt as Though I’d Been in Jail’: Women’s Experiences of Maternity Care During Labour, Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum.” Feminism & Psychology 15 (3): 315–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28: 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., M. J. Turner, and J. M. Stronge. 1991. “Outcome of the Second Labour in Patients Whose First Labour was Prolonged: the Dublin Experience.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 42: 15–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton, J. 1990. “Dimensions of nurse and patient roles in labor.” Health Care for Women International 11: 393–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckett, K. 2005. “Choosing Cesarean: Feminism and the Politics of Childbirth in the United States.” Feminist Theory 6 (3): 251–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E., and J. Davison. 2013. “Visual Management Studies: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches.” International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (2): 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belova, O. 2006. “The Event of Seeing: A Phenomenological Perspective on Visual Sense-Making.” Culture and Organization 12 (2): 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bluff, R., and I. Holloway. 1994. “‘They Know Best’: Women’s Perceptions of Midwifery Care During Labour and Childbirth.” Midwifery 10: 157–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boncori, I., and C. Smith. 2019. “I Lost my Baby Today: Embodied Writing and Learning in Organizations.” Management Learning 50 (1): 74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxembaum, E., C. Jones, R. Meyer, and S. Svejenova. 2018. “Towards an Articulation of the Material and Visual Turn in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 39 (5-6): 597–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewis, J. 2011. “New Intimacy, New Motherhood, Same Old Work?” In Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization, edited by E. Jeanes, D. Knigths, and P. Y. Martin, 147–162. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, J. 2014. “The Ethics of Researching Friends: On Convenience Sampling in Qualitative Management and Organization Studies.” British Journal of Management 25 (4): 849–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewis, J., V. Beck, A. Davies, and J. Matheson. 2017. The Effects of Menopause Transition on Women’s Economic Participation in the UK. Leicester: Department for Education, University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, J., and S. Warren. 2001. “Pregnancy as Project: Organizing Reproduction.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 23: 383–406.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, D., and E. Williams. 2019. “Writing as Skin: Negotiating the Body in(to) Learning About the Managed Self.” Management Learning 50 (1): 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervi, L. 2017. “The Fertility Show as a Field-Configuring Event: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. 2018. Bodies that Birth: Vitalizing Birth Politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, P. 2017. “The Nightdress I Wore to Give Birth In.” Performance Research 22 (4): 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L. 2011. “Time, Space and Touch at Work: Body Work and Labour Process (Re)Organisation.” Sociology of Health and Illness 33 (2): 189–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L., and C. Wolkowitz. 2018. “The Feminization of Body Work.” Gender, Work & Organization 25 (1): 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colyar, J. 2009. “Becoming Writing, Becoming Writers.” Qualitative Inquiry 15 (2): 421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. “Introducing the new Materialisms.” In New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, edited by D. Coole, and S. Frost, 1–46. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822392996-001.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. 2004. “Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11 (3): 373–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K., and Y. Lantham. 2015. “Ethics and Entangled Embodiment: Bodies–Materialities–Organization.” Organization 22 (2): 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick-Read, G. 2013. Childbirth Without Fear: The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth. London: Pinter & Martin.
   Google Scholar
• Essén, A., and S. W. Värlander. 2013. “The Mutual Constitution of Sensuous and Discursive Understanding in Scientific Practice: An Autoethnographic Lens on Academic Writing.” Management Learning 44 (4): 395–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. 2011. “Managing the Maternal Body: A Comprehensive Review and Transdisciplinary Analysis.” International Journal of Management Reviews 13 (1): 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. 2013. “Maternal Body Work: How Women Managers and Professionals Negotiate Pregnancy and New Motherhood at Work.” Human Relations 66 (5): 621–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. 2014. “Monstrous Motherhood Versus Magical Maternity? An Exploration of Conflicting Attitudes to Maternity Within Health Discourses and Organizational Settings.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33 (7): 633–647.
   Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. 2017. “Boundary Creatures? Employed, Breastfeeding Mothers and ‘Abjection as Practice’.” Organization Studies, doi:10.1177/0170840617736932. First Published Online December 4, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2000. “Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organisations.” Organization 7 (2): 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2019. “If we Practice Posthumanist Research, do we Need ‘Gender’ any Longer?” Gender, Work and Organization 26: 40–53. doi:10.1111/gwao.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, S., N. Harding, J. Helin, and A. Pullen. 2019. “Writing Differently.” Management Learning 50 (1): 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and A. Traianou. 2012. Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. 2011. “Tensions in (Re)Presenting the Self in Reflexive Autoethnographical Research.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 6 (2): 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2016. “Dialogical Writing: Co-Inquiring Between the Written and the Spoken World.” Culture and Organization, doi:10.1080/14759551.2016.1197923.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2019. “Dream Writing: Writing Through Vulnerability.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (2): 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennekam, S. 2016. “Identity Transition During Pregnancy: The Importance of Role Models.” Human Relations 69 (9): 1765–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H. 2000. “The Suffering Mother and the Miserable Son: Organizing Women and Organizing Women’s Writing.” Gender, Work & Organization 7 (2): 98–105.
   Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H. 2005. “The Organisation and the Mouth of Hell.” Culture and Organization 11 (3): 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H. 2007. “The Codex, the Codicil and the Codpiece: Some Thoughts on Diminution and Elaboration in Identity Formation.” Gender, Work & Organization 14 (6): 619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpfl, H., and M. Kostera. 2002. Interpreting the Maternal Organization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huopalainen, A., and S. Satama. 2018. “Mothers and Researchers in the Making: Negotiating ‘New’ Motherhood Within the ‘New’ Academia.” Human Relations, doi:10.1177/0018726718764571. First Published Online April 17, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, G., K. Riach, and E. Bariola. 2018. “Temporality and Gendered Agency: Menopausal Subjectivities in Women’s Work.” Human Relations, doi:10.1177/0018726718767739. First Published Online April 29, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, S. 2019. “The Mothers in me.” Management Learning 50 (1): 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, K., and E. Bell. 2011. “Representing the Successful Managerial Body.” In Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization, edited by E. Jeanes, D. Knigths, and P. Y. Martin, 163–176. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 1997. “Sociality with Objects.” Theory, Culture & Society 14 (4): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. 1984. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, E. S. 1994. “What Do Women Want?: Issues of Choice, Control, and Class in Pregnancy and Childbirth.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8: 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann, H. 2015. “Miscarriage and the Stories We Live By.” Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (1): 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. 2001a. “Breaking Corporeal Boundaries.” In Contested Bodies, edited by R. Holliday, and J. Hassard, 81–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. 2001b. Bodies: Exploring Fluid Boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., and V. Schmied. 2013. “Splitting Bodies/Selves: Women’s Concepts of Embodiment at the Moment of Birth.” Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (6): 828–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyerly, A. 2006. “Shame, Gender, Birth.” Hypatia 21 (1): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Malacrida, M., and T. Boulton. 2012. “Women’s Perceptions of Childbirth ‘Choices’.” Gender & Society 26 (5): 748–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacrida, C., and T. Boulton. 2014. “The Best Laid Plans? Women’s Choices, Expectations and Experiences in Childbirth.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 18 (1): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, M., and M. Gissler. 2009. “Maternal Care and Birth Outcomes among Ethnic Minority Women in Finland.” BMC Public Health 9 (84). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirchandani, K. 2015. “Flesh in Voice: The no-Touch Embodiment of Transnational Customer Service Workers.” Organization 22 (6): 909–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. E. 2010. “Is the Healthy Body Gendered? Toward a Feminist Critique of the New Paradigm of Health.” Body & Society 16 (2): 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. 2015. The Argonauts. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, C. 2009. Agency and Embodiment: Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R. 2018. Seduction: men, Masculinity and Mediated Intimacy. Medford, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., and S. V. Scott. 2008. “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization.” The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1): 433–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., A. Pullen, and C. Rhodes. 2014. “Writing Organization as Gendered Practice: Interrupting the Libidinal Economy.” Organization Studies 35 (3): 313–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1993. “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 559–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porschnitz, E., and E. A. Siler. 2017. “Miscarriage in the Workplace: An Authoethnography.” Gender, Work and Organization 24 (6): 565–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A. 2006. “Gendering the Research Self: Social Practice and Corporeal Multiplicity in the Writing of Organizational Research.” Gender, Work and Organization 13 (3): 277–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A. 2018. “Writing as Labiaplasty.” Organization 25 (1): 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2008. “Dirty Writing.” Culture and Organization 14 (3): 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2015. “Ethics, Embodiment and Organizations.” Organization 22 (2): 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, J. L., and A. D. Smith. 2012. “Using Photographs to Research Organizations: Evidence, Considerations, and Application in a Field Study.” Organizational Research Methods 15 (2): 288–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, S. 2007. “Under the Desk: On Becoming a Mother in the Workplace.” Culture and Organization 13 (3): 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. 2012. “The Birth of the Clinic and the Advent of Reproduction: Pregnancy, Pathology and the Medical Gaze in Modernity.” Body & Society 18 (2): 110–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 1997. Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2019. Accessed March 29, 2019. http://www.stat.fi/til/synt/2017/02/synt_2017_02_2018-12-04_tie_001_en.html#_ga=2.181730144.67931741.1553764546-60423021.1553764546.
   Google Scholar
• Strati, A. 2007. “Sensible Knowledge and Practice-Based Learning.” Management Learning 38 (1): 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. 2000. “Carework as a Form of Bodywork.” Ageing and Society 20 (4): 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, J., C. Wolkowitz, C. Cohen, and S. Nettleton. 2011. “Conceptualising Body Work in Health and Social Care.” Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (2): 171–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. 2000. “Reframing Pregnant Embodiment.” In Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism, edited by S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, M. Mcneil, and B. Skeggs, 288–301. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vachhani, S. J. 2013. “(Re)Creating Objects From the Past – Affect, Tactility and Everyday Creativity.” Management & Organizational History 8 (1): 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Vachhani, S. 2014. “Always Different? Exploring the Monstrous-feminine and Maternal Embodiment in Organisation.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33: 648–661.
   Google Scholar
• Van Amsterdam, N. 2015. “Othering the ‘Leaky Body’. An Autoethnographic Story About Expressing Breast Milk in the Workplace.” Culture and Organization 21 (3): 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viisainen, K. 2001. “Negotiating Control and Meaning: Home Birth as a Self-Constructed Choice in Finland.” Social Science & Medicine 52: 1109–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2004. Body and Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S. 2006. “An Autoethnography on Learning About Autoethnography.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (2): 146–160.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. J. 2010. “Childbirth Embodiment: Problematic Aspects of Current Understandings.” Sociological Health Illness 32 (3): 486–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. 2008. “Empirical Challenges in Organizational Aesthetics Research: Towards a Sensual Methodology.” Organization Studies 29 (4): 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. 2009. “Performance, Emotion and Photographic Histories.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22 (7): 1142–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S., and J. Brewis. 2004. “Matter over Mind?.” Sociology 38 (2): 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Witz, A. 2000. “Whose Body Matters? Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism.” Body & Society 6 (2): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkowitz, C. 2002. “The Social Relations of Body Work.” Work, Employment and Society 16 (3): 497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkowitz, C. 2006. Bodies at Work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. J., and J. Newton. 2006. “Childlessness and Women Managers: ‘Choice’, Context and Discourses.” Gender, Work and Organization 13 (4): 338–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar