Polysemy and plural institutional logics

References

• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2000. “Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research Challenges, Responses, Consequences.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36 (2): 136–158. doi: 10.1177/0021886300362002
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2007. “Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1265–1281. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2000. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blomgren, R. 2015. “Hur påverkas kvalitet och makt när staten blir aktör?” In Kvalitet Text Makt: Ett triangeldrama, edited by C. Wigerfelt, 47–59. Gothenburg: Tidsskriftverkstaden i Väst.
   Google Scholar
• Brülde, B. 2007. “Kvalitet, Värde och Livskvalitet.” In Den Omätbara Kvaliteten, edited by L. Strannegård, 175–201. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., B. Hinings, R. Greenwood, and J. L. Brown. 1996. “Sedimentation and Transformation in Organizational Change: The Case of Canadian law Firms.” Organization Studies 17: 623–647. doi: 10.1177/017084069601700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covalski, M., M. W. Dirsmith, and L. Rittenberg. 2003. “Jurisdictional Disputes Over Professional Work: The Institutionalization of the Global Knowledge Expert.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28: 325–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, W., and A. D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 1999. Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2000. “Translation Impossible? Accounting for a City Project.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23 (3): 420–437. doi: 10.1108/09513571011034361
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2007. “Management she Wrote: Organization Studies and Detective Stories.” Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 5 (1): 13–41. doi: 10.1080/10245289908523519
   Google Scholar
• Danto, A. 1964. “The Artworld.” The Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571–584. doi: 10.2307/2022937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie, G. 1971. Aesthetics: An Introduction. New York: Pegasus.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, F. 1994. “Cultural Models of Organizations: The Social Construction of Rational Organizing Principles.” In The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives, edited by D. Crane, 117–141. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fliegstein, N. 1997. “Social Skill and Institutional Theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (4): 397–405. doi: 10.1177/0002764297040004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A., and M. Lounsbury. 2005. “From the Critic’s Corner: Logic Blending, Discourse Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1031–1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1996/97:3. Kulturpolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2009/10:3. Tid för kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 2000. “Assessing Inter-Organizational Collaboration: Multiple Conceptions and Multiple Methods.” In Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues, edited by D. Falukner and M. De Rond, 243–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. 2002. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüsay, A. A. God at Work: an Institutional Perspective on the Impact of Religion on Organizations. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A., and H. Rao. 1997. “Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1606–1651. doi: 10.1086/231128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensmans, M. 2003. “Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields.” Organization Studies 24 (3): 355–381. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. 1999. “Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (4): 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Propaganda Analysis. 1938. Propaganda Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackall, Robert. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. 2013. “Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 137–159. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F. R., K. A. Munir, and H. Willmott. 2007. “A Dark Side of Institutional Entrepreneurship: Soccer Balls, Child Labour and Postcolonial Impoverishment.” Organization Studies 28 (7): 1055–1077. doi: 10.1177/0170840607078114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, M. 2002. “Mobilizing the Logic of Managerialism in Professional Fields: The Case of Academic Health Centre Mergers.” Organization Studies 23 (3): 391–420. doi: 10.1177/0170840602233004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., C. Hardy, and N. Phillips. 2002. “Institutional Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration: The Emergence of Proto-Institutions.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, K., K. Golden-Biddle, and M. S. Feldman. 2008. “Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process.” Organization Studies 19 (6): 907–918.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. 2007. “A Tale of two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (2): 289–307. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24634436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlman, J. 1972. “The ‘Floating Signifier’: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan.” Yale French Studies 48: 10–37. doi: 10.2307/2929621
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. 2017. Accessed March 1, 2017 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quality.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnich, E. K. 1990. Transforming Knowledge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. W., and V. Duquenne. 1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1988-1977.” Theory and Society 26 (2-3): 305–356. doi: 10.1023/A:1006896022092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir, K. A., and N. Phillips. 2005. “The Birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of new Technologies.” Organization Studies 26 (11): 1665–1687. doi: 10.1177/0170840605056395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, L. S., B. Townley, and D. Cooper. 1998. “Business Planning as Pedagogy: Language and Control in a Changing Institutional Field.” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 257–292. doi: 10.2307/2393853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W. 1995. “The Enactment of Economic Adversity: A Reconciliation of Theories of Failure-Induced Change and Threat Rigidity.” Research in Organizational Behavior 17: 287–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., and J. Joseph. 2005. “Cultural Adaption and Institutional Change: The Evolution of Vocabularies of Corporate Governance, 1972-2003.” Poetics 33 (3-4): 163–178. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Reports of the Swedish Government. 2006:42. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside Hybrid Organizations: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1995. ( First published in 1903.) The 1903 Lectures on Pragmatism. ( Edited by Turrisi, P. A.) Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., T. B. Lawrence, and C. Hardy. 2000. “Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (1): 23–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, K. L. 1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Structure of Human Behavior. Haag: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, H., P. Monin, and R. Durand. 2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 795–843. doi: 10.1086/367917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H., P. Monin, and R. Durand. 2005. “Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy.” American Sociological Review 70: 968–991. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. R. Hinings. 2009. “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 629–652. doi: 10.1177/0170840609104803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. Jones. 2016. “Qualitatively capturing institutional logics.” Strategic Organization 14 (4): 441–454. doi: 10.1177/1476127015589981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2007. “Att Kvalitetsbedöma Arkitekturprojekt.” In Den Omätbara Kvaliteten, edited by L. Strannegård, 85–102. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ruef, M. 1999. “The Dynamics of Organizational Forms: Creating Market Actors in the Health Care Field.” Social Forces 77 (4): 1405–1434. doi: 10.2307/3005881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandin Bülow, K. 2007. “Design = Kvalitet.” In Den Omätbara Kvaliteten, edited by L. Strannegård, 56–76. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W., M. Ruef, P. J. Mendel, and C. A. Caronna. 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Strannegård, L. 2007. “Kvalitet på Modet.” In Den Omätbara Kvaliteten, edited by L. Strannegård, 13–25. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., and R. Greenwood. 2005. “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 35–67. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2005. The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. 2002. “The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets From Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., C. Jones, and K. Kury. 2005. “Institutional Logics and Institutional Change: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by C. Jones, and P. H. Thornton, 125–170. London: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: Foundations, Research, and Theoretical Elaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Towley, B. 2002. “The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J., J. B. Sørensen, and T. R. Mitchell. 2007. “Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Interplay Between Theory and Method.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1145–1154. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O. 2003. “Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries.” Theory and Society 32 (2): 181–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1023995520369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O. 2005. Talking Prices, Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wingårdh, G., and R. Wærn. 2007. “Arkitekturkvalitet.” In Den Omätbara Kvaliteten, edited by L. Strannegård, 77–85. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2002. “Institutionalization as an Interplay Between Actions, Meanings, and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel.” The Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 234–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2008. “The Work of Meanings in Institutional Processes and Thinking.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, and R. Suddaby, 151–169. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar