If on a summer’s day a researcher: the implied author and the implied reader in writing differently

References

• Ahonen, P., A. Blomberg, K. Doerr, K. Einola, A. Elkina, G. Gao, J. Hambleton, et al. 2020. “Writing Resistance Together.” Gender, Work & Organization 27 (4): 447–470. doi:10.1111/gwao.12441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badley, G. F. 2019. “Post-Academic Writing: Human Writing for Human Readers.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (2): 180–191. doi:10.1177/1077800417736334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1967. The Death of the Author. Aspen, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Beavan, K. 2019. “(Re)Writing Woman: Unshaming Shame with Cixous.” Management Learning 50 (1): 50–73. doi:10.1177/1350507618782486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boje, D. 1995. “Stories of the Storytelling Organization: A Postmodern Analysis of Disney as ‘Tamara-Land’.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (4): 997–1035. doi:10.2307/256618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. 2008. “Resurrection of the Implied Author: Why Bother?” In A Companion to Narrative Theory, edited by J. Phelan and P. Rabinowitz, 75–88. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, D. N., and E. Williams. 2019. “Writing as Skin: Negotiating the Body in(to) Learning About the Managed Self.” Management Learning 50 (1): 87–99. doi:10.1177/1350507618800715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvino, I. 1993. If on a Winter’s Night a Traveller. London: Random House Everyman’s Library.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., and G. E. Marcus. 2011. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. 25th Anniversary ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C. 2016. “How I Write: An Inquiry into the Writing Practices of Academics.” Journal of Management Inquiry 25 (1): 69–84. doi:10.1177/1056492615585875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 1998. A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dar, S. 2019. “The Masque of Blackness: Or, Performing Assimilation in the White Academe.” Organization 26 (3): 432–446. doi:10.1177/1350508418805280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einola, K., A. Elkina, G. Gao, J. Hambleton, A. L. Kaasila-Pakanen, E. Mandalaki, and A. Pullen. 2021. “Writing Multi-Vocal Intersectionality in Times of Crisis.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (4): 1600–1623. doi:10.1111/gwao.12577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, W. 1949. “Authors, Speakers, Readers, and Mock Readers.” College English 11: 265. doi:10.2307/585994.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C., and A. Sinclair. 2006. “Writing Differently.” Organization 13 (3): 443–453. doi:10.1177/1350508406063492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2013. “Dialogic listening: Toward an embodied understanding of how to “go on” during fieldwork. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management.” An International Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2015. “Writing Process After Reading Bakhtin: From Theorized Plots to Unfinalizable ‘Living’ Events.” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (2): 174–185. doi:10.1177/1056492614546898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2016. “Dialogical Writing: Co-Inquiring Between the Written and the Spoken Word.” Culture and Organization, 1–15. doi:10.1080/14759551.2016.1197923.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2019. “Dream Writing: Writing Through Vulnerability.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (2): 95–99. doi:10.1177/1077800418810984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2020. “Temporality Lost: A Feminist Invitation to Vertical Writing That Shakes the Ground.” Organization. doi:10.1177/1350508420956322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huopalainen, A. 2022. “Writing with the Bitches.” Organization 29 (6): 959–978. doi:10.1177/1350508420961533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huopalainen, A., and S. Satama. 2019. “Writing Birthing Bodies: Exploring the Entanglements Between Flesh and Materiality in Childbirth.” Culture and Organization, 1–22. doi:10.1080/14759551.2019.1618854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kindt, T. 2006. The Implied Author Concept and Controversy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kiriakos, C. M., and J. Tienari. 2018. “Academic Writing as Love.” Management Learning 49 (3): 263–277. doi:10.1177/1350507617753560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivinen, N. 2021. “Writing Grief, Breathing Hope.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (2): 497–505. doi:10.1111/gwao.12581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostera, M. 1997. “Personal Performatives: Collecting Poetical Definitions of Management.” Organization 4 (3): 345–353. doi:10.1177/135050849743003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubowitz, H. 2012. “The Default Reader and a Model of Queer Reading and Writing Strategies Or: Obituary for the Implied Reader.” Style 46 (2): 201–228. doi:10.5325/style.46.2.201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanser, S. S. 2011. “The Implied Author: An Agnostic Manifesto.” Style 45 (1): 153–160. doi:10.5325/style.45.1.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, B. 2017. “Writing Through the Labyrinth: Using L’ecriture Feminine in Leadership Studies.” Leadership 13 (1): 64–80. doi:10.1177/1742715015619969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, B. 2022. “Ways to Write an Academic Life: Queering the Academic Curriculum Vitae.” Management Learning 53 (3): 566–581. doi:10.1177/13505076211051201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. 2018. “My Dearest Friends of Colour.” M@n@Gement 21 (3): 1105–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, N., and C. Wegener. 2017. “Writing with Resonance.” Journal of Management Inquiry 26 (2): 193–201. doi:10.1177/1056492616673911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’shea, S. C. 2019. “My Dysphoria Blues: Or Why I Cannot Write an Autoethnography.” Management Learning 50 (1): 38–49. doi:10.1177/1350507618791115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, S. 2011. “Author, Reader and Text in Italo Calvino's If on a Winter's Night a Traveller.” Notes on Contemporary Literature 41 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. 2014. “Writing: What Can Be Said, by Who, and Where?” In Critical Management Research: Reflections from the Field, edited by E. Jeanes and T. Huzzard, 211–216. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pérezts, M. 2022. “Unlearning Organized Numbness Through Poetic Synesthesia: A Study in Scarlet.” Management Learning 53 (4): 652–674. doi:10.1177/13505076221112795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, J. 2011. “The Implied Author, Deficient Narration, and Nonfiction Narrative: Or, What's Off-Kilter in the Year of Magical Thinking and the Diving Bell and the Butterfly?” Style 45 (1): 119–137. doi:10.5325/style.45.1.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., A. Pullen, and C. Rhodes. 2014. “Writing Organization as Gendered Practice: Interrupting the Libidinal Economy.” Organization Studies 35 (3): 313–333. doi:10.1177/0170840613483656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A. 2006. “Gendering the Research Self: Social Practice and Corporeal Multiplicity in the Writing of Organizational Research.” Gender, Work & Organization 13 (3): 277–298. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00308.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A. 2018. “Writing as Labiaplasty.” Organization 25 (1): 123–130. doi:10.1177/1350508417735537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2008. “Dirty Writing.” Culture and Organization 14 (3): 241–259. doi:10.1080/14759550802270684.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. J. 2011. “‘The Absence of Her Voice from That Concord’: The Value of the Implied Author.” Style 45 (1): 99–108. doi:10.5325/style.45.1.99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2000. “Reading and Writing Organizational Lives.” Organization 7 (1): 7–29. doi:10.1177/135050840071002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2009. “After Reflexivity: Ethics, Freedom and the Writing of Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 653–672. doi:10.1177/0170840609104804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2015. “Writing Organization/Romancing Fictocriticism.” Culture and Organization 21 (4): 289–303. doi:10.1080/14759551.2014.882923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. 2018. “Sense-ational Organization Theory! Practices of Democratic Scriptology.” Management Learning. doi:10.1177/1350507618800716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and E. A. St. Pierre. 2017. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 956–978. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, J. G., and D. Jones. 2015. “Truth Scribbled in Blood: Women's Work, Menstruation and Poetry.” Gender, Work & Organization 22 (2): 94–111. doi:10.1111/gwao.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, J. G., and L. A. Martin. 2021. “‘The King was Pregnant’: Organizational Studies and Speculative Fiction with Ursula K. Le Guin.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (2): 626–640. doi:10.1111/gwao.12603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, D. 2011. “What Is the Implied Author?” Style 45 (1): 80–98. doi:10.5325/style.45.1.80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. 2013. “A Material Dean.” Leadership 9 (3): 436–443. doi:10.1177/1742715013485859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. 2019. “Five Movements in Embodied Feminism: A Memoir.” Human Relations 72 (1): 144–158. doi:10.1177/0018726718765625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleiman, S. R., and I. C. Wimmers. 1980. The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sword, H. 2012. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, J. P. 1980. Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachhani, S. J. 2015. “Organizing Love – Thoughts on the Transformative and Activist Potential of Feminine Writing.” Gender, Work & Organization 22 (2): 148–162. doi:10.1111/gwao.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachhani, S. J. 2019. “Rethinking the Politics of Writing Differently Through Écriture Féminine.” Management Learning 50 (1): 11–23. doi:10.1177/1350507618800718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. 2000. “Ethnographic Fiction Science: Making Sense of Managerial Work and Organizational Research Processes with Caroline and Terry.” Organization 7 (3): 489–510. doi:10.1177/135050840073007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, R. 2019. “Writing the Doctoral Thesis Differently.” Management Learning 50 (1): 100–113. doi:10.1177/1350507618799867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, R. 2020. “Even When Those Struggles Are Not Our Own: Storytelling and Solidarity in a Feminist Social Justice Organization.” Gender, Work & Organization 27 (4): 471–486. doi:10.1111/gwao.12386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, R. 1999. “A ‘Sampled’ Account of Organisation: Being a De-Authored, Reflexive Parody of Organisation Writing.” Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 5 (1): 195–233. doi:10.1080/10245289908523526.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., ed. 2013. Italo Calvino Letters, 1941–1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar