The Place of Shetland Knitting

References

• Abrams, L. 2005. Myth and Materiality in a Woman’s World: Shetland 1800–2000. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, L. 2012. “There Is Many a Thing That Can Be Done with Money’: Women, Barter, and Autonomy in a Scottish Fishing Community in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37 (3): 602–609. doi:10.1086/662700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. 2010. “An Assessment of the Gender Dynamic in Fair Isle (Shetland) Knitwear.” Textile History 41 (1): 86–98. doi:10.1179/174329510x12670196126683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. 2013. “Far Isn’t Far’: Shetland on the Internet.” Visual Studies 28 (3): 271–282. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2013.829995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, M., and E. Jackson. 2013. “Place-Making and Place Maintenance: Performativity, Place and Belonging among the Middle Classes.” Sociology 47 (4): 793–809. doi:10.1177/0038038512454350.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, C., and C. Gibson. 2016. “Geographies of Making: Rethinking Materials and Skills for Volatile Futures.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (3): 297–315. doi:10.1177/0309132515578775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. 2015. “The History of the Fine Lace Knitting Industry in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Shetland.” PhD diss., University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, B. 2016. Cult Media, Fandom, and Textiles: Handicrafting as Fan Art. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, S. 2018. The Vintage Shetland Book. Lancaster: Susan Crawford Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. 2012. Colours of Shetland. Edinburgh: Kate Davies Designs.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. 2014. Yokes. Edinburgh: Kate Davies Designs.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. 2016a. The Book of Haps. Edinburgh: Kate Davies Designs.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. 2016b. Shetland Oo. Edinburgh: Kate Davies Designs.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, N. 2011. “Do-It-Yourself: The Precarious Work and Postfeminist Politics of Handmaking (in) Detroit.” Utopian Studies 22 (2): 261–284. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0261.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, L. G. 1995. Knitting by the Fireside and on the Hillside: History of the Shetland Hand Knitting Industry c.1600–1900. Lerwick: Shetland Times Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. 2011. Making Is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, S. 2008. “The Challenges of Intellectual Property for Users of Social Networking Sites: A Case Study of Ravelry.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Entertainment and Media in the Ubiquitous Era, MindTrek ’08, 125–130. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovick, E. 2010. “Knitting Politics.” Northern Lace, May 3. https://northernlace.wordpress.com/tag/shetland-schools/.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, S. 2013. “The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour after Etsy.” Cultural Studies Review 19 (1): 249–270. doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2585.
   Google Scholar
• Maines, R. 2009. Hedonizing Technologies: Paths to Pleasure in Hobbies and Leisure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T. H. J. 2008. “Muscles, Morals and Mind: Craft Apprenticeship and the Formation of Person.” British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (3): 245–271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00407.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marter, H. J. 2010. “Knitting Goes from School Curriculum.” Shetland News, May 07. http://www.shetnews.co.uk/news/2919-knitting-goes-from-school-curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. 2015. Les industries créatives dans une zone périphérique: le cas des îles Shetland. Paris: Observatoire des mutations des industries culturelles.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2016. Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Newington, L. 2014. “In the Loop’: Challenging and Disrupting the Stereotypes of Knitting.” Textile: Cloth and Culture 12 (1): 8–17. doi:10.2752/175183514x13916051793352.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson, J. R. 1976. The Shetland Way of Oil. Lerwick: Shetland Times Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K. 2013. “Knit, Purl and Upload: New Technologies, Digital Mediations and the Experience of Leisure.” Leisure Studies 3 (3): 1–17. doi:10.1080/02614367.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ozolina, I. 2018. Knit like a Latvian: 50 Knitting Patterns for a Fresh Take on Traditional Latvian. Tewkesbury: SewandSo.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, K. 2019. Project Report: Supporting Diversity in Craft Practice through Digital Technology Skills Development. London: Crafts Council.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. B. 2014. “Knitting as Cultural Heritage: Knitting Blogs and Conservation.” In Annual Review of Cultural Heritage Informatics: 2012–2013, edited by Samantha K. Hastings, 63–76. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, C. 2011. Fair Isle Knitting: A Gift from Shetland. Japan: Gaia.
   Google Scholar
• Scollay, L. 2015. “Twenty Fifteen.” Knit British, December 31. http://www.knitbritish.net/twentyfifteen/.
   Google Scholar
• Shetland Guild of Spinners, Weavers and Dyers. 2018. Fair Isle Designs from Shetland. Lerwick: Shetland Times Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Starmore, A. 2010. Aran Knitting. Mineola: Dover Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall, H., and E. Johnson. 2018. 50 Tips from Shetland Knitters. Filmed and edited by J. J. Jamieson and Dave Donaldson. Lerwick. DVD.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, J. 2009. The Culture of Knitting. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P., and J. Taggart. 2013. “Doing Islandness: A Non-Representational Approach to an Island’s Sense of Place.” Cultural Geographies 20 (2): 225–242. doi:10.1177/1474474011428098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar