Top cited research over fifteen years in Sports Biomechanics

References

• Bollen, J., van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009). A principle component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS One, 4, e6022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64, 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 286–291. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado, R. A., Wurtzel, W. A., Simon, C. B., Riddle, D. L., & George, S. Z. (2011). Content and bibliometric analysis of articles published in the journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 41, 920–931. doi:10.2519/JOSPT.2011.3808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declaration on Research Assessment. (2015). Declaration on research assessment. http://www.ascb.org/dora/
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., & Cabezas-Clavjo, A. (2013). Ranking journals: Could google scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, 26, 101–114. doi:10.1087/20130206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M. (2010). The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 174–182. doi:10.1016/joi2015.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, S., Li, C., & Ansari, P. (2018). The top 50 most cited publications in disability sport: A bibliometric analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills. doi:10.1177/0031512518760350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2005). Statistical and reporting errors in applied biomechanics research. In Q. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of XXIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Volume 2 (pp. 811–814). Beijing: China Institute of Sport Science.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2012). Citation classics in tennis medicine and science. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 17, 118–122.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2013a). Top journals related to kinesiology according to the SCImago database. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 24, 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2013b). Impact and prestige of kinesiology-related journals. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 13. doi:10.2466/50.17.CP.2.13
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2014). Citation rates for highly-cited papers from different sub-disciplinary areas within kinesiology. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 25, 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015a). Citation rate of highly-cited papers in 100 kinesiology-related journals. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19, 44–50. doi:10.1080/1091367X.2014.988336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015b). Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 26, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015c). Biomechanics scholar citations across academic ranks. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 7, 142–146. doi:10.1515/bhk-2015-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2017). Profiles of excellence in sports biomechanics research. In W. Potthast, A. Niehoff, & S. David (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35^th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 831–834). Cologne, Germany: German Sport University Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2018). Citation metrics of excellence in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomechanics. doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1391328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Chow, J. (2008). North American perception of the prestige of biomechanics serials. Gait & Posture, 27, 559–563. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Ostarello, J. (2008). International prestige of sports biomechanics serials. In Y. H. Kwon, J. Shim, & I. S. Shin (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVIth International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 62–66). Seoul: Seoul National University.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Ostarello, J. (2010). Influential literature in applied sports biomechanics. In R. Jensen, W. Ebben, E. Petushek, C. Richter, & K. Roemer (Eds.), Scientific Proceedings of the 28^thConference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 765–768). Marquette, MI: Northern Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Kurmis, A. P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), 85A, 2449–2454. doi:10.2106/00004623-200312000-00028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1327–1336. doi:10.1002/asi.v60:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez-Lara, A., Stone, A. V., Luo, T. D., Parker, B. R., Sharma, A., & Freehill, M. T. (2017). Top 50 cited journal articles on overhead throwing athletes: A bibliometric analysis. JSES Open Access, 1, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.jses.2017.06.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moed, H. F. (2002). The impact-factors debate: The ISI’s uses and limits. Nature, 415, 731–732. doi:10.1038/415731a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owlia, P., Vasei, M., Goliaei, B., & Nassiri, I. (2011). Normalized impact factor (NIF): An adjusted method for calculating the citation rate of biomedical journals. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The PLoS Medicine Editors. (2006). The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine, 3, e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179, 1091–1092. doi:10.1083/jcb.2007.11140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Irreproducible results: A response to Thompson scientific. Journal of Cell Biology, 180, 254–255. doi:10.1083/jcb.200801036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 628–638. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497–502. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
   Google Scholar
• Shadagan, B., Roig, M., HajGhanbari, B., & Reid, W. D. (2010). Top-cited articles in rehabilitation. Archives in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 806–815. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 193–196. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahira, M., Abdullah, A., Alias, R. A., & Bakri, A. (2016). Evaluation of new research performance indices at the researcher level. Information Development. doi:10.1177/0266666916674251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagenas, G., Palaiothodorou, D., & Knudson, D. (2018). Thirty year trends of study design and statistics in applied sports and exercise biomechanics research. International Journal of Exercise Science, 11, 239–259.
   Google Scholar
• van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2004). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30, 489–506. doi:10.1111/padr.2004.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. H. (2009). Google scholar search performance: Comparative recall and precision. Libraries and the Academy, 9, 5–24. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., & Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101, 125–158. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation. PLoS ONE, 12, e0174205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14, 033033. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/03303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar