References
- Anderson, R., Harrison, A., & Lyons, G. M. (2005). Rowing: Accelerometry-based feedback – Can it improve movement consistency and performance in rowing? Sports Biomechanics, 4, 179–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140508522862
- Bompa, T. O. (1980). Technique and muscle force. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Science, 15, 245–249.
- Černe, T., Kamnik, R., Vesnicer, B., Zganec Gros, J., & Munih, M. (2013). Differences between elite, junior and non-rowers in kinematic and kinetic parameters during ergometer rowing. Human Movement Science, 32, 691–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.006
- Delignières, D., Nourrit, D., Sioud, R., Leroyer, P., Zattara, M., & Micaleff, J. P. (1998). Preferred coordination modes in the first steps of the learning of a complex gymnastics skill. Human Movement Science, 17, 221–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(97)00031-6
- Elliott, B., Lyttle, A., & Birkett, O. (2002). The RowPerfect ergometer: A training aid for on-water single scull rowing. Sports Biomechanics, 1, 123–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140208522791
- Gorman, A. J., Willmott, A. P., & Mullineaux, D. R. (2016). The determination of breakpoints in time-series data. In M. Ae, Y. Enomoto, N. Fujii, & H. Takagi (Eds.) Proceedings of the XXXIV International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 613–616). Tsukuba, Japan.
- Hamill, J., van Emmerick, R. E. A., Heiderscheit, B. C., & Li, L. (1999). A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clinical Biomechanics, 14, 297–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)90092-4
- Jongerius, N., Willems, P. B. J., & Savelberg, H. H. C. M. (2018). Different inertial properties between static and dynamic rowing ergometers cause acute adaptations in coordination patterns. Cogent Medicine, 5, 1478599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1478699
- Klavora, P. (1977). Three predominant styles: The Adam style; the DDR style; the Rosenberg style. Catch, 9, 13.
- Kleshnev, V. (2010). Boat acceleration, temporal structure of the stroke cycle, and effectiveness in rowing. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 224, 63–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1243/17543371JSET40
- Lamb, D. H. (1989). A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 17, 367–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658901700310
- Lay, B. S., Sparrow, W. A., Hughes, K. M., & O’Dwyer, N. J. (2002). Practice effects on coordination and control, metabolic energy expenditure, and muscle activation. Human Movement Science, 21, 807–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00166-5
- Mackenzie, H. A. M., Bull, A. M. J., & McGregor, A. H. (2008). Changes in rowing technique over a routine one hour low intensity high volume training session. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 7, 486–491.
- McArthur, J. (2002). High performance rowing (pp. 71–74). Marlborough: The Crowood Press Ltd.
- Nourrit, D., Delignières, D., Caillou, N., Deschamps, T., & Lauriot, B. (2003). On discontinuities in motor learning: A longitudinal study of complex skill acquisition on a ski-simulator. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 151–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890309602130
- Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced – Frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890009601379
- Pollock, C. L., Jenkyn, T. R., Jones, I. C., Ivanova, T. D., & Garland, S. J. (2009). Electromyography and kinematics of the trunk during rowing in elite female rowers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41, 628–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818c1300
- Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specificity of learning in a video – Aiming task: Modifying the salience of dynamic visual clues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 367–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.37.5.367-376
- Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
- Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor science (pp. 59–75). Dordecht: Kulwer.
- Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Reiner, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 21–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2013.826169
- Sigrist, R., Schellenberg, J., Rauter, G., Broggi, S., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2011). Visual and auditory augmented concurrent feedback in a complex motor task. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20, 15–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00032
- Spinks, W. L., & Smith, R. M. (1994). The effects of kinetic information feedback on maximal rowing performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 27, 17–35.
- Wei, K., & Körding, K. (2009). Relevance of error: What drives motor adaptation? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 655–664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90545.2008
- Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., & Lewthwaite, R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 316–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607635
- Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 185–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196276
- Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 180–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601335