Combined treatment for skin laxity of the aging face with monopolar radiofrequency and intense focused ultrasound in Korean subjects

References

• Weitgasser L, Cotofana S, Winkler M, Buerger H, Jamnig D, Anderhuber F, et al. Detailed vascular anatomy of the medial femoral condyle and the significance of its use as a free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(12):1683–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierloff M, Stohring C, Buder T, Wiltfang J. The subcutaneous fat compartments in relation to aesthetically important facial folds and rhytides. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(10):1292–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(1):80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbler MS. Tord skoog: face-lift innovator. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3(1):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards AF, Massaki AB, Fabi S, Goldman M. Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of a monopolar radiofrequency device with a new vibration handpiece for the treatment of facial skin laxity: a 10-month experience with 64 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(1 Pt 1):104–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliklich RE, White WM, Slayton MH, Barthe PG, Makin IR. Clinical pilot study of intense ultrasound therapy to deep dermal facial skin and subcutaneous tissues. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(2):88–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, et al. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(2):204–09.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minkis K, Alam M. Ultrasound skin tightening. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32(1):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruza GJ. Rejuvenating the aging face. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(11):1383–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim KH, Geronemus RG. Nonablative laser and light therapies for skin rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(6):398–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganceviciene R, Liakou AI, Theodoridis A, Makrantonaki E, Zouboulis CC. Skin anti-aging strategies. Dermatoendocrinol. 2012;4(3):308–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):753–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder WJ. Facial rejuvenation and volumization using implants. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27(1):86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dendle J, Wu DC, Fabi SG, Melo D, Goldman MP. A retrospective evaluation of subsurface monopolar radiofrequency for lifting of the face, neck, and jawline. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(11):1261–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EJ, Kwon HI, Yeo UC, Ko JY. Lower face lifting and contouring with a novel internal real-time thermosensing monopolar radiofrequency. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(7):1379–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Kim E, Kim J, Ro Y, Ko J. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of wrinkles and skin laxity in seven different facial areas. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27(6):688–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HJ, Min J, Seo HM, Kim WS. Comparison of effect between high intense focused ultrasound devices for facial tightening: evaluator-blinded, split-face study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016;18(5):252–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Munavalli G, Beasley KL. Monopolar radiofrequency facial tightening: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5(8):707–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laubach HJ, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Manstein D. Intense focused ultrasound: evaluation of a new treatment modality for precise microcoagulation within the skin. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(5):727–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle MA, Dover JS. Tissue tightening technologies. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(4):491–499, vii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brobst RW, Ferguson M, Perkins SW. Ulthera: initial and six month results. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2012;20(2):163–176, vi.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers J, Fabi S, Weiss R. Monopolar radiofrequency for skin tightening: our experience and a review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(Suppl 12):S168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WM, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Gliklich RE. Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(1):22–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee AY. Recent progress in melasma pathogenesis. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015;28(6):648–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh DH, So BJ, Lee SJ, Song KY, Ryu HJ. Intense focused ultrasound for facial tightening: histologic changes in 11 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015;17(4):200–03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WS, Park BS, Sung JH, Yang JM, Park SB, Kwak SJ, et al. Wound healing effect of adipose-derived stem cells: a critical role of secretory factors on human dermal fibroblasts. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;48(1):15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Jung M, Kim HS, Kim YM, Choi EH. Adipose-derived stem cells as a new therapeutic modality for ageing skin. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(5):383–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama Y, Akita H, Hasegawa S, Negishi K, Akamatsu H, Matsunaga K. Histologic study of collagen and stem cells after radiofrequency treatment for aging skin. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(4):390–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar