177
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

A split-face comparative trial of photopneumatic therapy versus intense pulsed light for the treatment of acne vulgaris

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 185-189 | Received 25 Jul 2018, Accepted 18 Sep 2020, Published online: 18 Oct 2020

References

  • Collier CN, Harper JC, Cantrell WC, Wang W, Foster KW, Elewski BE.The prevalence of acne in adults 20 years and older. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):56–59. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.06.045.
  • William DJ, Timothy GB, Dirk ME. Andrews’ diseases of the skin. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2006. p. 231–39.
  • Nouri K, Villafradez-Diaz LM.Light/laser therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2005;4(4):318–20. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2005.00213.x.
  • Omi T, Munavalli GS, Kawana S, Sato S.Ultrastructural evidence for thermal injury to pilosebaceous units during the treatment of acne using photopneumatic (PPX) therapy. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10(1):7–11. doi:10.1080/14764170701762427.
  • Gold MH, Biron J. Efficacy of a novel combination of pneumatic energy and broadband light for the treatment of acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:639–42.
  • Shamban AT, Enokibori M, Narukar V, Wilson D. Photopneumatic technology for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:139–45.
  • Sung KJ, Ro YS, Choi EH, Oh JJ, Lee JH, Kim SW, Kim NI. Korean acne grading system. Korean J Dermatol. 2004;42:1241–47.
  • Katsambas A, Papakonstantinou A.Acne: systemic treatment. Clin Dermatol. 2004;22(5):412–18. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.03.014.
  • Strauss JS, Krowchuk DP, Leyden JJ, Lucky AW, Shalita AR, Siegfried EC, Thiboutot DM, Van Voorhees AS, Beutner KA, Sieck CK, et al. Guidelines of care for acne management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(4):651–63. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.048.
  • Bhardwaj SS, Rohrer TE, Arndt K.Lasers and light therapy for acne vulgaris. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2005;24(2):107–12. doi:10.1016/j.sder.2005.04.001.
  • Elman M, Lask G. The role of pulsed light and heat energy (LHE) in acne clearance. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:91–95. doi:10.1080/14764170410035584.
  • Gregory AN, Thornfeldt CR, Leibowitz KR, Lane M. A study on the use of a novel light and heat energy system to treat acne vulgaris. Cosmet Dermatol. 2004;17:287–92.
  • Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Rhee DY, Choi JH, Moon KC, Suh HS, Cho SY. Treatment of facial acne papules and pustules in Korean patients using an intense pulsed light device equipped with a 530- to 750- nm filter. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:676–79.
  • Kawana S, Tachihara R, Kato T, Omi T.Effect of smooth pulsed light at 400 to 700 and 870 to 1,200 nm for acne vulgaris in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(1):52–57. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01380.x.
  • Elman M, Lebzelter J. Light therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:139–46.
  • Tzung TY, Wu KH, Huang ML. Blue light phototherapy in the treatment of acne. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2004;20:266–69. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0781.2004.00109.x.
  • Elman M, Slatkine M, Harth Y. The effective treatment of acne vulgaris by a high-intensity, narrow band 405-420 nm light source. J Cosmetic Laser Ther. 2003;5:111–17. doi:10.1080/14764170310001276.
  • Papageorgiou P, Katsambas A, Chu A.Phototherapy with blue (415 nm) and red (660 nm) light in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):973–78. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03481.x.
  • Katsambas A, Dessinioti C.New and emerging treatments in dermatology: acne. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21(2):86–95. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00175.x.
  • Lee EJ, Lim HK, Shin MK, Suh DH, Lee SJ, Kim NI.An open-label, split-face trial evaluating efficacy and safety of photopneumatic therapy for the treatment of acne. Ann Dermatol. 2012;24(3):280–86. doi:10.5021/ad.2012.24.3.280.
  • Cunliffe WJ, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, George SA, Coutts I, Roseeuw DI, Hachem JP, Sidou F, Soto P. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1% versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:S218–226.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.