Refining normative stakeholder theory: insights from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam

References

• Agle, B.R. and Van Buren III, H.J., 1999. God and mammon: the modern relationship. Business ethics quarterly, 9 (4), 563–582.10.2307/3857935
   Google Scholar
• Albaum, G. and Peterson, R.A., 2006. Ethical attitudes of future business leaders: do they vary by gender and religiosity? Business & society, 45 (3), 300–321.
   Google Scholar
• Argandoña, A., 2011. Beyond contracts: Love in firms. Journal of business ethics, 99 (1), 77–85.10.1007/s10551-011-0750-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K., 2002. Islam: a short history. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies, 2012. Available from: http://www.asarb.org [ Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Beekun, R.I., 1996. Islamic business ethics. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, B.K. and Dunn, C.P., 1996. Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business ethics quarterly, 6 (2), 133–147.10.2307/3857619
   Google Scholar
• Calton, J.M. and Payne, S.L., 2003. Coping with paradox: multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & society, 42 (1), 7–42.
   Google Scholar
• Centenary Perspective, 1976. Available from: http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/100.htm [ Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Christian Aid, 2004. Behind the mask: the real face of corporate social responsibility. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Columbus Platform, 1937. Jewish virtual library. Available from: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/Columbus_platform.html [ Accessed 9 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W., 1995. Integrative social contracts theory. Economics and philosophy, 11 (1), 85–112.10.1017/S0266267100003230
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C. and Starik, M., 2004. The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of business ethics, 49 (1), 55–73.10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013852.62017.0e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E., and Liedtka, J., 2006. Enhancing stakeholder practice: a particularized exploration of community. Business ethics quarterly, 16 (1), 23–42.10.5840/beq20061611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, H. and Phillips, R.A., 2009. Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business ethics quarterly, 19 (3), 403–432.10.5840/beq200919323
   Google Scholar
• Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M.E., and Berman, S.L., 2011. Bounding the world’s miseries: corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In: R.A. Phillips, ed. Stakeholder theory: impact and prospects. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A.D., ed., 2009. Augustine through the ages. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, T.L., 1997. The corporation as mediating institution: an efficacious synthesis of stakeholder theory and corporate constituency statutes. Notre Dame law review, 73 (1), 173–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business ethics quarterly, 4 (4), 409–421.10.2307/3857340
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1999. Response: divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management review, 24 (2), 233–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. and Gilbert, D.R., 1988. Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. and Phillips, R.A., 2002. Stakeholder theory: a libertarian approach. Business ethics quarterly, 12 (3), 331–349.10.2307/3858020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., and Parmar, B., 2004. Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization science, 15 (3), 364–369.10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., Martin, K., and Parmar, B., 2007. Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of business ethics, 74 (4), 303–314.10.1007/s10551-007-9517-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D.R., 1992. The twilight of corporate strategy: a comparative ethical critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, D.W., 2011. A fourth use of the law? The Decalogue in the workplace. Journal of religion and business ethics, 2, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J.D. and Wicks, A.C., 2007. Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business ethics quarterly, 17 (3), 375–398.10.5840/beq200717346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. and Anderson, E., 2009. ‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: implications of labeling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific journal of human resources, 47 (2), 186–200.10.1177/1038411109105441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, M., 2012. Islamic perceptions of business ethics and the impact of secular thoughts on Islamic business ethics. International journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 2 (3), 98–120.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T.M. and Wicks, A.C., 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management review, 24 (2), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, D., 1999. What can eastern philosophy teach us about business ethics? Journal of business ethics, 19 (1), 71–79.10.1023/A:1006102022834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, J.M., 1996. Feminist morality and competitive reality: a role for an ethic of care? Business ethics quarterly, 6 (2), 179–200.10.2307/3857622
   Google Scholar
• Little, L.K., 1978. Religious poverty and the profit economy in medieval Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T.M., 2006. The sacred paths of the west. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McVea, J.F. and Freeman, R.E., 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of management inquiry, 14 (1), 57–69.10.1177/1056492604270799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., and Wood, D.J., 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management review, 22 (4), 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muelder, W.G., 1953. Religion and economic responsibility. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, L. and McLennan, S., 2001. Church on Sunday, work on Monday: the challenge of fusing Christian values with business life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1986. Economic justice for all: pastoral letter on Catholic social teaching and the U.S. economy. Available from: http://www.usccb.org/upload/economic_justice_for_all.pdf [Accessed 9 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• New Pittsburgh Platform, 1999. Central conference of American rabbis. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20060621004932/http://data.ccarnet.org/platforms/principles.html [ Accessed 9 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Niebuhr, H.R., 1960. Radical monotheism and western civilization. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 2012. Available from: http://www.pewforum.org. [ Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R.A., 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. New York: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R.A. and Freeman, R.E., 2008. Corporate citizenship and community stakeholders. In: A.G. Scherer and G. Palazzo, eds. Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Pittsburgh Platform, 1885. Jewish virtual library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/pittsburgh_program.html [ Accessed 9 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Rice, G., 1999. Islamic ethics and the implications for business. Journal of business ethics, 18 (4), 345–358.10.1023/A:1005711414306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D.M., 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, T.J., 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management review, 22 (4), 887–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., 1991. The world’s religions. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Starik, M., 1995. Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non- human nature. Journal of business ethics, 14 (3), 207–217.10.1007/BF00881435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R., 2001. One true god: historical consequences of monotheism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamari, M., 1997. The challenge of wealth: Jewish business ethics. Business ethics quarterly, 7 (1), 45–56.10.2307/3857297
   Google Scholar
• United Methodist Church, 2004. Economic justice for a new millennium, resolution 204. Book of resolutions. Available from: http://www.umc-gbcs.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=frLJK2PKLqF&b=2954221&ct=4838943&notoc=1 [Accessed 9 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Van Buren III, H.J. and Greenwood, M., 2011. Bringing stakeholder theory to industrial relations. Employee relations, 33 (1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werhane, P.H., 2011. Globalization, mental models, and decentering stakeholder approaches. In: R.A. Phillips, ed. Stakeholder theory: impacts and prospects. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Werhane, P., et al., 2011. Trust after the global financial meltdown. Business and society review, 116, 403–433.10.1111/basr.2011.116.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Westermann-Behaylo, M., Berman, S.L., and Van Buren, H.J., forthcoming. The influence of institutional logics on corporate responsibility towards employees. Business & society. doi: 10.1177/0007650313476934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C., 1996. Overcoming the separation thesis: the need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & society, 35 (1), 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C., Gilbert, D.R., and Freeman, R.E., 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business ethics quarterly, 4 (4), 475–497.10.2307/3857345
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. and Zinkin, J., 2009. Islam and CSR: a study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam and the UN global compact. Journal of business ethics, 91 (5), 519–533.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management review, 16 (4), 691–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaroug, A.H., 1999. Ethics from an Islamic perspective: basic issues. American journal of Islamic social sciences, 16 (3), 45–63.
   Google Scholar