Stakeholder theory and spirituality

References

• Barrett, R., 2009. What’s right and wrong with spirituality in the workplace. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 6 (3), 261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J.C. and Porras, J., 1994. Built to last: successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• DeKlerk, J.J., Boshoff, A.B., and Van Wyk, R., 2006. Spirituality in practice: relationships between meaning in life, commitment and motivation. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 3 (4), 319–347.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E., 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management review, 20 (1), 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business ethics quarterly, 4 (4), 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., and Wicks, A.C., 2007. Managing for stakeholders: survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., et al., 2010. Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815768
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times magazine, 13 September, pp. 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, 4 (1), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J.S. and Wicks, A.C., 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business ethics quarterly, 23 (1), 97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C., 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business ethics quarterly, 12 (2), 235–256.10.2307/3857812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T.M., 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management review, 20 (2), 404–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinjerski, V. and Skrypnek, B.J., 2006. Creating organizational conditions that foster employee spirit at work. Leadership & organization development journal, 27 (4), 280–295.
   Google Scholar
• Marens, R. and Wicks, A., 1999. Getting real: stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business ethics quarterly, 2 (2), 273–293.10.2307/3857475
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P., 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, 48 (2), 268–305.10.2307/3556659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVea, J.F. and Freeman, R.E., 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of management inquiry, 14 (1), 57–69.10.1177/1056492604270799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., 2006. Economics for humans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226572055.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E., and Wicks, A.C., 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business ethics quarterly, 13 (4), 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quddus, M., Bailey, H.I.I.I., and White, L.R., 2009. Business ethics: perspectives from Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 6 (4), 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Reynes, S.L., Bartunke, J.M., Dutton, J.E., and Margolis, J.D., 2012. Care and compassion through an organizational lens: opening up new possibilities. Academy of Management review, 37 (4), 503–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, L.A., 2012. The shareholder value myth: how putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations and the public. New York: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann, A.A., 1985. Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management review, 10 (3), 540–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werhane, P., et al., 2011. Trust after the global financial meltdown. Business and society review, 116 (4), 403–433.10.1111/basr.2011.116.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E.D. and Williams, K.D., 2010. The potential balm of religion and spirituality for recovering from ostracism. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 7 (1), 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C. and Freeman, R.E., 1998. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti-positivism and the search for ethics. Organization science, 9 (2), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C., Berman, S.L., and Jones, T.M., 1999. The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management review, 24 (1), 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C., et al., 2010. Business ethics: a managerial approach. Boston, MA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zingales, L., 2012. Do business schools incubate criminals? Available from: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-07-16/do-business-schools-incubate-criminals- [Accessed 16 July 2012].
   Google Scholar