References
- Flamm, BL. Once a Cesarean, always a controversy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:312–15
- Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1187–97
- Menacker F, Curtin SC. Trends in Cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous Cesarean, 1991-99. National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2001;49:1–15
- Borgida AF, Zelop CM, DeRoche M, et at. Changes in VBAC attempts and success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:S104 (abstr)
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 5. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1999
- Greene MF. Vaginal delivery after Cesarean section — Is the risk acceptable? N Engl J Med 2001;345:54–5
- Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, et at. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior Cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:882–6
- Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, et at. Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with a prior lower uterine segment vertical incision compared to a lower segment transverse incision. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:735–40
- McMahon MJ, Luter ER, Bowes WA Jr, et at. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second Cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:689–95
- Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, et al. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100:348–5