Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: The impact of anesthesia

References

• Corri B, James A K, Hershel J. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom. Time trends in the General Practice Research Database. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 151–155
   Google Scholar
• Ministero della Salute. Dipartimento della qualità. Direzione generale sistema informativo. Certificato di assistenza al parto (CeDAP). Analisi dell'evento nascita – anno 2003. Ministero della Salute, Rome 2005
   Google Scholar
• Kavak Z N, Başgül A, Ceyhan N. Short-term outcome of newborn infants: Spinal versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A perspective randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 100: 50–54
   Google Scholar
• Dick W F. Anaesthesia for caesarean section (epidural and general): Effects on the neonate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59(Suppl)S61–S67
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly J E, D'Alessio J, Ramanathan J. Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate. Pediatric Drugs 2003; 5: 615–627
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: A review. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 586–609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson M G. Regional anesthesia for obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2000; 18: 383–406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratcliffe F M, Evans J M. Neonatal well-being after elective cesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1993; 10: 175–181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casey B M, McIntire D D, Leveno K J. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 467–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papile L A. The Apgar score in the 21st century (editorial). N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 519–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibli K U, Russell I F. A survey of anaesthetic techniques used for caesarean section in the UK in 1997. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9: 160–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G W, Russell I F. A survey of anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995; 4: 214–218
   Google Scholar
• Tsen L C, Pitner R, Camman W R. General anesthesia for cesarean section at a tertiary care hospital 1990–1995: Indications and implications. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998; 7: 147–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamer U M, Messerschmidt A, Wulf H. Anaesthesia for caesarean section—a German survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 678–684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley-Forster P. Regional techniques for cesarean section. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Man 2000; 5: 24–29
   Google Scholar
• Riley E T. Regional anesthesia for cesarean section. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Man 2003; 7: 204–212
   Google Scholar
• Gogarten W. Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 17: 377–392
   Google Scholar
• Kan R K, Lew E, Yeo S W, Thomas E. General anesthesia for cesarean section in a Singapore maternity hospital: A retrospective survey. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 221–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan P H, Bogard T D, Owen M D. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of 19 259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 227–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCahon R A, Catling S. Time required for surgical readiness in emergency caesarean section: Spinal compared with general anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 178–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins J L. Maternal morbidity and mortality: Anesthetic causes. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: R1–R5
   Google Scholar
• Berg C J, Chang J, Callaghan W M, Whitehead S J. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 289–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J L, Koonin L M, Palmer S K, Gibbs C P. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979–1990. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 277–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne L, Wilson R, Lyons G, Dresner M. Failed intubation revisited: 17-yr experience in a teaching maternity unit. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 680–684
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington S, Carli F, Dakin M J. Increase in Mallampati score during pregnancy. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 638–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsoon G L, Young J R. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Security. Reports on Health and Social Subjects, number 34. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in England and Wales 1982–1984. HMSO, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Department of Health, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996. HMSO, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Department of Health, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die. The sixth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 2000–2002. HMSO, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-minute Apgar score: A population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 65–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notzon F C, Cnattingius S, Bergjso P. Cesarean delivery in 1980s: International comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 495–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S. Indications for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti T J. Obstetric hemorrhage. Obstetrics—normal and problem pregnancies. 4th ed, S G Gabbe. Churchill Livingstone, New York 2002; 510–521
   Google Scholar
• Clark S, Koonings P, Phelan J. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 89–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay N, Buist R, Steer P. Caesarean section: An evolving procedure?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 286–287
   Google Scholar