References
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 58. Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1449–1458
- Vintzileos A M, Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Beazoglou T, Knuppel R A. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: Cost–benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 655–660
- Copel J A. At long last, a CPT change for obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 1–3
- Saari-Kemppained A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen O P. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: Controlled trial of systematic on-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet 1990; 336: 387–391
- Saari-Kemppained A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen O P. Fetal anomalies in a controlled one-stage ultrasound screening trial. A report from the Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. J Perinat Med 1994; 22: 279–289
- Ecker J L, Frigoletto F D. Routine ultrasound screening in low-risk pregnancies: Imperatives for further study. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 607–610
- Crane J P, LeFevre M L, Winborn R C, Evans J K, Ewigman B G, Bain R P, Frigoletto F D, McNellis D. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: Impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 392–399
- Saari-Kemppainen A. Use of antenatal care services in a controlled ultrasound screening trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 12–14
- Mills T A, Mastrobattista J M, Silva J, Monga M. An abnormal screening ultrasound: Concordance with a tertiary obstetrical ultrasound unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15: 372–374