Cervical insufficiency: Re-evaluating the prophylactic cervical cerclage

References

• McDonald I A. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1957; 64: 346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shirodkar V N. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52: 299
   Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Seibel-Seamon J. Contemporary use of cervical cerclage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50: 468–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson R C, Durfee R B. Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol 1965; 25: 145–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groom K M, Jones B A, Edmonds D K, Bennett P R. Preconception transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 230–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony G S. Transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage in the management of cervical incompetence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 72: 127–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarano C L, Herron M A, Parer J T. Validity of indications for transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1871–1875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy M J. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164(6 Part 1)1635–1641, discussion 1641–1642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenburg H C, Lotgering F K. Transabdominal cerclage for closure of the incompetent cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987; 25: 121–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen S, Tobiassen T. Transabdominal isthmic cerclage for the treatment of incompetent cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 473–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy M J. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for the management of repetitive abortion and premature delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 44–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahran M. Transabdominal cervical cerclage during pregnancy. A modified technique. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 502–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey R, Geary M, Dornan J, McKenna P. A successful pregnancy following transabdominal cervical cerclage for cervical hypoplasia. BJOG 2001; 108: 1111–1112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, Hannah M. Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 868–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fadhli R, Tulandi T. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 497–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho C H, Kim T H, Kwon S H, Kim J I, Yoon S D, Cha S D. Laparoscopic transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage during pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 2003; 10: 363–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mingione M J, Scibetta J J, Sanko S R, Phipps W R. Clinical outcomes following interval laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage placement: case series. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1716–1719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallot D, Savary D, Laurichesse H, Bournazeau J A, Amblard J, Lemery D. Experience with three cases of laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage and two subsequent pregnancies. BJOG 2003; 110: 696–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser K B, Childers J M, Surwit E A. Transabdominal cerclage: a laparoscopic approach. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91(5 Part 2)855–856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboujaoude R, Maloof P, Alvarez M, Al Khan A. A novel method for laparoscopic abdominal cerclage utilizing minimally invasive hydrodissection: a case report. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 428–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghomi A, Rodgers B. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: a case report and a review of the described operative techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 337–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjollesdal M, Nielsen S, Stjerndahl J H, Ellstrom Engh M A. Laparoscopic cervico-uterine cerclage using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of cervical incompetence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 823–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter J F, Soper D E. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2005; 9: 491–493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Theobald P. Laparoscopic cerclage of the isthma. [See comment]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2002; 31: 273–275
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scibetta J J, Sanko S R, Phipps W R. Laparoscopic transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 161–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComiskey M, Dornan J C, Hunter D. Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cervical suture. Ulster Med J 2006; 75: 228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saling E. Prevention of habitual abortion and prematurity by ealy total occlusion of the external os uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 17: 165–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified? [See comment][comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous, Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 516–523
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drakeley A J, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. [See comment][erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 621–627, 2004 Jan;103(1):201]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J A, Hamilton B E, Ventura S J, Menacker F, Park M M, Sutton P D. Births: final data for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002; 51: 1–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter J K. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(2 Part 1)311–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy G A, Miodovnik M, Langer O, Sibai B, McNellis D. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001; 286: 1340–1348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard J U, Tart M, Moawad A H. Cervical length at 16–22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 972–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitich H, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P. Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1465–1472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L, Giudicelli Y, Perdu M, Houssin I, Safe F, Nisand I. Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176(1 Part 1)196–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams J D, Goldenberg R L, Meis P J, Mercer B M, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper R L, Johnson F, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. [See comment]. New Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr-Hill R A, Hall M H. The repetition of spontaneous preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 921–928
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Fonseca E B, Bittar R E, Carvalho M H, Zugaib M. Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. [See comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 419–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meis P J, Klebanoff M, Thom E, Dombrowski M P, Sibai B, Moawad A H, Spong C Y, Hauth J C, Miodovnik M, Varner M W, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. New Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2379–2385, [See comment][erratum appears in N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1299]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Halbesma J R, Vork F, Hübener M, van Eyck J. Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix?. J Perinat Med 2003; 31: 122–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca E B, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides K H. Fetal Medicine Foundation, Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. [See comment]. New Engl J Med 2007; 357: 462–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust O A, Atlas R O, Jones K J, Benham B N, Balducci J. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 830–835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To M S, Alfirevic Z, Heath V C, Cicero S, Cacho A M, Williamson P R, Nicolaides K H. Fetal Medicine Foundation, Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. [See comment]. Lancet 2004; 363: 1849–1853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, Hummel P, Bekedam D J, van Geijn H P. Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. [See comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1106–1112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Odibo A O, To M S, Rust O A, Althuisius S M. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 181–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrablin S, Lovric H, Banovic V, Kralik S, Dijakovic A, Kalafatic D. Maternal plasma interleukin-6, interleukin-1β and C-reactive protein as indicators of tocolysis failure and neonatal outcome after preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 335–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna N, Bonifacio L, Weinberger B, Reddy P, Murphy S, Romero R, Sharma S. Evidence for interleukin-10-mediated inhibition of cyclo- oxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin production in preterm human placenta. Am J Reprod Immunol 2006; 55: 19–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim S S, Romero R, Jun J K, Moon K C, Kim G, Yoon B H. C-reactive protein concentration in vaginal fluid as a marker for intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18: 417–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Patel K, Sehgal P B, Tejani N. Evaluation of amniotic fluid cytokines in preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18: 241–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Pasquier J C, Simoneau J, Arpin M H, Duperron L, Morency A M, Audibert F. Intra-amniotic sludge, short cervix, and risk of preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 198–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Espinoza J, Goncalves L F, Romero R, Nien J K, Stites S, Kim Y M, Hassan S, Gomez R, Yoon B H, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 346–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusanovic J P, Espinoza J, Romero R, Goncalves L F, Nien J K, Soto E, Khalek N, Camacho N, Hendler I, Mittal, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 706–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Schaudinn C, Kusanovic J P, Gorur A, Gotsch F, Webster, Nhan-Chang C L, Erez O, Kim C J, Espinoza J, et al. Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198(135)e1–e5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakai M, Shiozaki A, Tabata M, Sasaki Y, Yoneda S, Arai T, Kato K, Yamakawa Y, Saito S. Evaluation of effectiveness of prophylactic cerclage of a short cervix according to interleukin-8 in cervical mucus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse D J, et al. A trial of 17 α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 454–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar