Toward a new modality for detecting a uterine rupture: electrohysterogram propagation analysis during trial of labor after cesarean

References

• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, et al. Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG 2009;116:1069–78. Discussion 1078-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128:257–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres AW, Johnson TR, Hayashi R. Characteristics of fetal heart rate tracings prior to uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;74:235–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:171–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:506–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutschek B, Bender HG, Henrich W. Silent uterine rupture during vaginal delivery successfully managed conservatively. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:199–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers WJ. The electrical activities of the uterus during pregnancy. Reprod Sci 2013;20:182–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D’Agostino HJ, Jr. et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:569–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz OH, Paddock R. The cesarean scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1925;10:153–71
   Google Scholar
• Rabotti C, Mischi M. Propagation of electrical activity in uterine muscle during pregnancy: a review. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2015;213:406–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lau H, Rabotti C, Bijloo R, et al. Automated conduction velocity analysis in the electrohysterogram for prediction of imminent delivery: a preliminary study. Comput Math Methods Med 2013;2013:627976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabotti C, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW. Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:2178–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van ‘t Hooft J, Rabotti C, Oei SG. Electrohysterographic evaluation of preterm contractions in a patient with a unicornuate uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:730–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabotti C, Oei SG, van ‘t Hooft J, Mischi M. Electrohysterographic propagation velocity for preterm delivery prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:e9–10; author reply e10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lau H, Rabotti C, Bijlo R, et al. Automated conduction velocity analysis in the electrohysterogram for prediction of imminent delivery: a preliminary study. Comput Mathemat Methods Med 2013;2013:7
   Google Scholar
• Jezewski J, Horoba K, Matonia A, Wrobel J. Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach. Physiol Meas 2005;26:753–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooijakkers MJ, Rabotti C, Oei SG, et al. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure estimation using the Teager energy operator on electrohysterographic recordings. Physiol Meas 2014;35:1215–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers WJ, Arafat K, el-Kays A, el-Sharkawy TY. Spatial and temporal variations in local spike propagation in the myometrium of the 17-day pregnant rat. Am J Physiol 1994;267:C1210–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers WJ, Mirghani H, Stephen B, et al. Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea pig uterus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008;294:R919–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Garfield RE, Daniel EE. Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. Am J Physiol 1989;256:C130–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkington HC, Harding R, Sigger JN. Co-ordination of electrical activity in the myometrium of pregnant ewes. J Reprod Fertil 1988;82:697–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikkelsen E, Johansen P, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Uldbjerg N. Electrohysterography of labor contractions: propagation velocity and direction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1070–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs G, van Leeuwen M, Rottinghuis H, Boeles JT. An electromyographic study of the human uterus during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37:241–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao CY. Long-term observations of spontaneous electrical activity of the uterine smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 1959;196:343–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs G, Rottinghuis H. Electrical and mechanical activity of the human uterus during labour. Arch Gynakol 1970;208:373–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buhimschi CS, Zhao G, Sora N, et al. Myometrial wound healing post-Cesarean delivery in the MRL/MpJ mouse model of uterine scarring. Am J Pathol 2010;177:197–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab A, Hassan M, Marque C, Karlsson B. Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals. Med Eng Phys 2014;36:761–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab A, Hassan M, Boudaoud S, et al. Nonlinear estimation of coupling and directionality between signals: application to uterine EMG propagation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:4366–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan M, Terrien J, Muszynski C, et al. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:1160–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar