Predictors for prolonged interval from premature rupture of membranes to spontaneous onset of labor at term

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletins No. 139: premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:918–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marowitz A, Jordan R. Midwifery management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007;52:199–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn GC, Mishell DR Jr, Morton DG. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:469–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J, Keirse MJNC. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Vol. 2. Childbirth. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1989:1112–17
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM study group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1005–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA, et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:CD005302
   Google Scholar
• Mozurkewich EL, Wolf FM. Premature rupture of membranes at term: a meta-analysis of three management schemes. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:1035–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, et al. International multicentre term prelabor rupture of membranes study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1024–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafni A, Goeree R, Myhr TL, et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM study group. Term prelabour rupture of the membranes. CMAJ 1997;157:1519–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirse MJ, Ottervanger HP, Smit W. Controversies: prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: the case for expectant management. J Perinat Med 1996;24:563–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM, Rabello YA, Thurnau GR, et al. The NICHD-MFMU antibiotic treatment of preterm PROM study: impact of initial amniotic fluid volume on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:438–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goya M, Bernabeu A, Garcia N, et al. Premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks managed expectantly: maternal and perinatal outcomes in singletons. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:290–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Hadar E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Factors affecting the duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:1051–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazze J, Anceschi M, Cerekja A, et al. Validity of amniotic fluid index in preterm rupture of membranes. J Perinat Med 2007;35:394–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gire C, Faggianelli P, Nicaise C, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:565–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RL, Austin JD. Cervical length measurement by translabial sonography in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: can it be used to predict the latency period or peripartum maternal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:105–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E, et al. The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:23–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoi E, Fuchs I, Henrich W, et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in preterm prelabor amniorrhexis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:550–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra S, Amon E, Hopkins S, et al. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:400.e1–e9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phupong V, Kulmala L. Factors associated with latency period in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;20:1–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintucci A, Meregalli V, Colombo P, Fiorilli A. Premature rupture of membranes at term in low risk women: how long should we wait in the “latent phase”? J Perinat Med 2014;42:189–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze M, Hart JE, Lynch AM, Gibbs RS. Intrapartum management of premature rupture of membranes: effect on cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1247–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE, et al. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:449–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59:1–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1232–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams VM, Potter JA, Bhat G, et al. Bacterial modulation of human fetal membrane toll-like receptor expression. Am J Reprod Immunol 2013;69:33–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:178–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, et al. Fetal exposure to an intra-amniotic inflammation and the development of cerebral palsy at the age of three years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:675–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery JP, Miller CE, Knight RD. The effect of labor on the rheologic response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:87–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren J, Taylor DJ, Bell SC. Increased incidence of apoptosis in non-labour-affected cytotrophoblast cells in term fetal membranes overlying the cervix. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2895–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:261–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Yariv O, Hiersch L, et al. Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:132–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar