Does ST analysis of fetal ECG reduce cesarean section rate for fetal distress?

References

• Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, et al. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:491.e1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;5:CD006066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiermeier S, Pildner von Steinburg S, Thieme A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study. BJOG 2008;115:1557–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen KG, Dagbjartsson A, Henriksson BA, et al. The relationship between circulating catecholamines and ST waveform in the fetal lamb electrocardiogram during hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;149:190–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG 2007;114:1191–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JS, Greene KR. Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1151–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:534–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer-Wsal K, Olofsson P, Rosen KG. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-totreat principle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:990–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala K, Varasmaki M, Makikallio K, et al. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography-a randomised controlled study. BJOG 2006;113:419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, David E, Meyer N, et al. A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:299.e1–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhuis ME, Visser GH, Moons KG, et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:406–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee A, van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW, Veerman J, et al. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:400–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, et al. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:632–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucciardo L, Blavier F, Faron G. Intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson P, Ayres-de-Campos D, Kessler J, et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:556–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson P, Ayres-de-Campos D, Kessler J, et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:571–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, et al. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:16–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Schuit E, Amer-Whalin I, et al. Electrocardiogram ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:127–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE clinical guidelines. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Issued December 2014. Available from: www.giudance.nice.org.uk/cg190
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Downe S, FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: intermittent auscultation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:9–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanardo V, Gabrieli C, de Luca F, et al. Head-to-body delivery by “two-step” approach: effect on cord blood hematocrit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1234–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straface G, Bassi E, De Santis M, et al. Transfusion risk: “two step” vaginal delivery a risk for post-partum hemorrhage? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;14:1–4
   Google Scholar
• Rattigan MI, Atkinson AL, Baum JD. Delivery route following elective induction of labor at term: analysis of 807 patients. J Clin Med Res 2013;5:305–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailit JL, Grobman W, Zhao Y, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Nonmedically indicated induction versus expecant treatment in term nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:103.e1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar