References
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2013. National vital statistics reports; vol 64, no 1. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Cesarean rates.com; source California office of statewide health planning and development: 2012 preliminary data for total cesarean rates based on hospital
- Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:842
- Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM. Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:477–84. Discussion 485–6
- Opoien HK. Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scanda 2007;86:1097–102
- Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J. Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2006;64:30
- Graves N, Halton K, Doidge S, et al. Who bears the cost of healthcare-acquired surgical site infection? J Hosp Infect 2008;69:274
- Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, et al. Attributable costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after low transverse cesarean delivery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:276–82
- Tita A, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, et al. Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol March 2009;113:675–82
- Wall P. Vertical Skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:952–6
- Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision and wound complication in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:e1–4
- Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, et al. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:682–90
- Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, et al. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:285–8
- Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:378–83
- Nuthalapaty FS, Kuper SG, Higdon HL. 3rd. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:166–7
- Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:265.e1–4
- Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;9:CD003577. Epub 2012
- Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, et al. Surgical Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:33–8
- Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, et al. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1169–75