Induction of labor in elderly nulliparous women

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 107. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:386–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. AHRQ Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 176. Rockville (MD): AHRQ; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Gelber S, Sciscione A. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:642–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of Labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;Issue 1. Art. No.:CD000941
   Google Scholar
• Buser D, Mora G, Arias F. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:581–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Peterson DE, Delke I, et al. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:401–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayburn WF, Wapner RJ, Barss VA, et al. An intravaginal controlled-release prostaglandin E2 pessary for cervical ripening and initiation of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:374–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter FR, Rocco LE, Johnson TR. A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 in a controlled-release vaginal pessary for cervical ripening at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:830–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:671–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore LE, Rayburn WF. Elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:698–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:240–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:245.e1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:261–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann M. Predicting a failed induction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:394–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favilli A, Acanfora MM, Bini V, et al. Single indication of labor induction with prostaglandins: is advanced maternal age a risk factor for cesarean section? A matched retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:665–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson JL, Richards DS, Otano L, Induction of labor. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, et al., eds. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2012;293–311
   Google Scholar
• Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, et al. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:311–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolus R. Determinants of response to intracervical prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;87:137–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, et al. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 2004;15:319–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, et al. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:883–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:287–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludford I, Scheil W, Tucker G, Grivell R. Pregnancy outcomes for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age in South Australia, 1998-2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;52:235–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo YJ, Ryu HM, Yang JH, et al. Pregnancy outcomes according to increasing maternal age. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012;51:60–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbay-Benziv R, Hader E, Ashwal E, et al. Induction of labor: does indication matter? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016 Aug 8; [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar