Automated 3D ultrasound measurement of the angle of progression in labor

References

• Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal Anatomy. In: Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al., eds. Williams Obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Operative vaginal deliveries: indications, techniques and complications. In: Warren R, Arulkumaran S, eds. Best Practice in Labour and Delivery. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:98.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Operative vaginal delivery. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;74:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchmann E, Libhaber E. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;101:285–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:868–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:313–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:165–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:216–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:387–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:331–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:753–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Maroni E, Cariello L, et al. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:1011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, et al. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:419–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz HP, Lanzarone V, Simpson JM. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:409–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Imani F, Becker T, et al. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:320–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:161 e161–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:326–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Maroni E, et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:430–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG 2011;118:62–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebo TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KA, et al. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebo TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KA, et al. Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:606–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, et al. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Bellussi F, Montaguti E, et al. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:183–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Ghi T, Awad EE, et al. Ultrasound in labor: a caregiver's perspective. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:469–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Bellussi F, Maroni E, et al. Ultrasound in labor: is it time for a more simplified approach?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:710–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho GJ, Hong HR, Seol HJ, et al. Use of the angle of progression on ultrasonography to predict spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days. J Perinat Med 2015;43:185–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Salsi G, Montaguti E, et al. Automated measurement of the angle of progression in labor: a feasibility and reliability study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1159/000448947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltieli Y, Nizard J. A question of angle of view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:363–4. author reply 364-366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Contro E, Farina A, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:500–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:310–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Ghi T, Pilu G. How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:476–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham FGGN, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, et al. Mechanisms of normal labor. In: Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, et al., eds. Williams Obstetrics. 21th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001:291–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Martelli F, et al. A new method to measure the subpubic arch angle using 3-D ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;38:195–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondo D, Youssef A, Mabrouk M, et al. Pelvic floor muscle dysfunction at 3d/4d transperineal ultrasound in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1002/uog.17323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Cavalera M, Pacella G, et al. Is a curved 3D ultrasound reconstruction needed to assess the ‘warped’ pelvic floor plane? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1002/uog.17304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Ghi T, Martelli F, et al. Subpubic arch angle and mode of delivery in low-risk nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2016;40:150–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Montaguti E, Sanlorenzo O, et al. A new simple technique for 3-dimensional sonographic assessment of the pelvic floor muscles. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Montaguti E, Sanlorenzo O, et al. Reliability of new three-dimensional ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:629–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Salsi G, Cataneo I, et al. Agreement between two 3D ultrasound techniques for the assessment of the subpubic arch angle. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:466–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG 2014;121:1029–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popowski T, Porcher R, Fort J, et al. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:520–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A. Does ultrasound determination of fetal occiput position improve labour outcome?. BJOG 2014;121:1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiser D, Schiff E, Lipitz S, et al. Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:283–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:82–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, et al. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:493–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Arcangeli T, Radico D, et al. Accuracy of fetal gender determination in the first trimester using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:557–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Salsi G, Bellussi F, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound is an accurate and reproducible technique for fetal crown-rump length measurement. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:220–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar