248
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Correlation between clinical fetal head station and sonographic angle of progression during the second stage of labor

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 2905-2910 | Received 21 May 2017, Accepted 22 Jul 2017, Published online: 04 Aug 2017

References

  • Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–1714.
  • Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:868–874.
  • Eggebø TM. Ultrasound is the future diagnostic tool in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:361–363.
  • Yeo L, Romero R. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:253–258.
  • Barbera A, Becker T, MacFarlane H, et al. Assessment of fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound: teaching DVD. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2003.
  • Eggebø TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:387–391.
  • Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, et al. Fetal head–symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:419–424.
  • Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, et al. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:436–441.
  • Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the “angle of progression” on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:216–222.
  • Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, et al. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:493–499.
  • Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the “angle of progression” predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:326–330.
  • Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:313–319.
  • Barbera AF, Imani F, Becker T, et al. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:320–325.
  • Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebø TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:425–429.
  • Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:29–34.
  • Royston P, Wright EM. How to construct “normal ranges” for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:30–38.
  • Silverwood RJ, Cole TJ. Statistical methods for constructing gestational age-related reference intervals and centile charts for fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:6–13.
  • Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Slowinski T, et al. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:712–716.
  • Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between openmagnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:161.e1–161.e5.
  • Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: Operative Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e56–e65.
  • Cuerva MJ, Bamberg C, Tobias P, et al. Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses innon-occiput posterior position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:687–692.
  • Bultez T, Quibel T, Bouhanna P, et al. Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:86–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.